DIN
Price
$36.50
Change
+$0.56 (+1.56%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
463.01M
39 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QSR
Price
$74.79
Change
+$3.33 (+4.66%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
25.94B
33 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DIN vs QSR

DIN vs QSR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DIN vs. QSR commentary
Jul 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIN is a Buy and QSR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2026
Stock price -- (DIN: $36.50 vs. QSR: $74.79)
Brand notoriety: DIN and QSR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DIN: 87% vs. QSR: 129%
Market capitalization -- DIN: $463.01M vs. QSR: $25.94B
DIN [@Restaurants] is valued at $463.01M. QSR’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $25.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $199.39B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $10.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DIN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileQSR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DIN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • QSR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, QSR is a better buy in the long-term than DIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DIN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QSR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DIN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QSR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QSR is a better buy in the short-term than DIN.

Price Growth

DIN (@Restaurants) experienced а +7.32% price change this week, while QSR (@Restaurants) price change was +2.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +2.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

DIN is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

QSR is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+2.08% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QSR($25.9B) has a higher market cap than DIN($463M). DIN has higher P/E ratio than QSR: DIN (28.94) vs QSR (23.10). DIN YTD gains are higher at: 14.980 vs. QSR (11.592). QSR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.68B vs. DIN (149M). DIN has less debt than QSR: DIN (1.62B) vs QSR (15.7B). QSR has higher revenues than DIN: QSR (9.59B) vs DIN (890M).
DINQSRDIN / QSR
Capitalization463M25.9B2%
EBITDA149M2.68B6%
Gain YTD14.98011.592129%
P/E Ratio28.9423.10125%
Revenue890M9.59B9%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.62B15.7B10%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DIN vs QSR: Fundamental Ratings
DIN
QSR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9037
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10051
SMR RATING
1..100
10035
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3950
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
448
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DIN's Valuation (10) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as QSR (22). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to QSR’s over the last 12 months.

QSR's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DIN (100). This means that QSR’s stock grew somewhat faster than DIN’s over the last 12 months.

QSR's SMR Rating (35) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DIN (100). This means that QSR’s stock grew somewhat faster than DIN’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as QSR (50). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to QSR’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QSR (48). This means that DIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than QSR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DINQSR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QSR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MNTN11.150.30
+2.76%
MNTN Inc.
EC14.700.25
+1.73%
Ecopetrol SA
OTTR90.63N/A
N/A
Otter Tail Corp
CNTB2.19N/A
N/A
Connect Biopharma Holdings Limited
SOAR0.17N/A
-1.99%
Volato Group Inc.

QSR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QSR has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QSR jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QSR
1D Price
Change %
QSR100%
+4.66%
FRSH - QSR
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DIN - QSR
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.56%
DPZ - QSR
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DRI - QSR
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
WEN - QSR
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More