Advertisement
FRSH vs SDOT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSH is a Hold and SDOT is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FRSH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSDOT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- FRSH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SDOT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FRSH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SDOT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FRSH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SDOT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
FRSH (@Packaged Software) experienced а +10.56% price change this week, while SDOT (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) price change was -24.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.33%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry was -3.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was -15.49%.
Reported Earning Dates
FRSH is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+3.35% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Agricultural Commodities/Milling (-3.40% weekly)The Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry includes companies that are involved in farming activities, such as crop production, livestock management and animal feed, for commercial purposes. The industry includes a wide range of operations from growing corn, to grain and oilseed processing to the operation of flour mills. Changes in consumer tastes is one of the critical factors influencing what products are grown and raised in this industry. Potential risks to the business include climate change and fluctuations in global prices of agricultural products. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Bunge Limited and Canopy Growth Corporation are some of the biggest U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| FRSH | SDOT | FRSH / SDOT | |
| Capitalization | 3.14B | 14M | 22,421% |
| EBITDA | 42.9M | -93.04M | -46% |
| Gain YTD | -7.306 | -45.248 | 16% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.48 | 0.34 | 5,513% |
| Revenue | 871M | 115M | 757% |
| Total Cash | 779M | 409K | 190,465% |
| Total Debt | 38.8M | 11.2M | 346% |
FRSH | SDOT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 61 Fair valued | 53 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 90 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 51 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 66 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 15 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SDOT's Valuation (53) in the null industry is in the same range as FRSH (61) in the Restaurants industry. This means that SDOT’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's Profit vs Risk Rating (90) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as SDOT (100) in the null industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to SDOT’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's SMR Rating (51) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SDOT (99) in the null industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew somewhat faster than SDOT’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as SDOT (66) in the null industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to SDOT’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for SDOT (100) in the null industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew significantly faster than SDOT’s over the last 12 months.
| FRSH | SDOT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 70% | 14 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 87% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BFRZ | 26.99 | 0.13 | +0.47% |
| Innovator Equity Managed 100 Buffer ETF | |||
| GMOM | 36.72 | N/A | -0.01% |
| Cambria Global Momentum ETF | |||
| DFGP | 53.25 | -0.19 | -0.36% |
| Dimensional Global Core Pls Fxd Inc ETF | |||
| HTAX | 24.28 | -0.21 | -0.86% |
| Macquarie National High-Yield Municipal Bond ETF | |||
| XRT | 89.78 | -0.80 | -0.88% |
| State Street® SPDR® S&P® Retail ETF | |||
SDOT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SDOT and FRSH have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SDOT and FRSH's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SDOT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SDOT | 100% | -5.63% | ||
| FRSH - SDOT | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.84% | ||
| CNNE - SDOT | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.09% | ||
| RICK - SDOT | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.45% | ||
| WEN - SDOT | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ARKR - SDOT | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.07% | ||
More | ||||