FRT
Price
$93.03
Change
-$1.94 (-2.04%)
Updated
Jul 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.36B
21 days until earnings call
GEO
Price
$25.04
Change
-$1.26 (-4.79%)
Updated
Jul 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.81B
21 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRT vs GEO

Header iconFRT vs GEO Comparison
Open Charts FRT vs GEOBanner chart's image
Federal Realty Investment Trust
Price$93.03
Change-$1.94 (-2.04%)
Volume$19.64K
Capitalization8.36B
GEO Group (The)
Price$25.04
Change-$1.26 (-4.79%)
Volume$2.1M
Capitalization1.81B
FRT vs GEO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GEO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRT vs. GEO commentary
Jul 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRT is a Buy and GEO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 16, 2025
Stock price -- (FRT: $92.99 vs. GEO: $25.04)
Brand notoriety: FRT and GEO are both not notable
FRT represents the Real Estate Investment Trusts, while GEO is part of the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRT: 129% vs. GEO: 81%
Market capitalization -- FRT: $8.36B vs. GEO: $1.81B
FRT [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $8.36B. GEO’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $1.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGEO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GEO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GEO is a better buy in the long-term than FRT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GEO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GEO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GEO is a better buy in the short-term than FRT.

Price Growth

FRT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -1.20% price change this week, while GEO (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -3.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.62%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +1.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRT is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

GEO is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.56% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+1.91% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRT($8.36B) has a higher market cap than GEO($1.81B). FRT has higher P/E ratio than GEO: FRT (35.98) vs GEO (19.81). GEO YTD gains are higher at: -10.508 vs. FRT (-14.164). FRT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 737M vs. GEO (482M). FRT has more cash in the bank: 251M vs. GEO (94M). GEO has less debt than FRT: GEO (1.89B) vs FRT (4.69B). GEO has higher revenues than FRT: GEO (2.41B) vs FRT (1.13B).
FRTGEOFRT / GEO
Capitalization8.36B1.81B462%
EBITDA737M482M153%
Gain YTD-14.164-10.508135%
P/E Ratio35.9819.81182%
Revenue1.13B2.41B47%
Total Cash251M94M267%
Total Debt4.69B1.89B248%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRT vs GEO: Fundamental Ratings
FRT
GEO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1715
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6337
SMR RATING
1..100
69100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5854
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
83100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GEO's Valuation (50) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (71). This means that GEO’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.

GEO's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (63). This means that GEO’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's SMR Rating (69) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as GEO (100). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to GEO’s over the last 12 months.

GEO's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (58). This means that GEO’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's P/E Growth Rating (83) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as GEO (100). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to GEO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRTGEO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GEO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ABIAX17.31N/A
N/A
AB International Value A
AFDCX51.35N/A
N/A
American Century Large Cap Equity C
HMVRX17.11N/A
N/A
Hartford MidCap Value R3
CCGIX25.84N/A
N/A
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth Instl
RNPGX69.86-0.35
-0.50%
American Funds New Perspective R6

FRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRT has been closely correlated with KIM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRT jumps, then KIM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRT
1D Price
Change %
FRT100%
-2.08%
KIM - FRT
88%
Closely correlated
-2.49%
KRG - FRT
86%
Closely correlated
-2.16%
REG - FRT
85%
Closely correlated
-1.87%
AKR - FRT
83%
Closely correlated
-2.04%
BRX - FRT
82%
Closely correlated
-2.58%
More