FSCC
Price
$35.65
Change
+$0.03 (+0.08%)
Updated
Sep 4, 12:51 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
400.78M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IWM
Price
$295.42
Change
+$0.23 (+0.08%)
Updated
Sep 4, 12:28 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
79.88B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSCC vs IWM

FSCC vs IWM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC) vs. iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM)

Key Takeaways

  • FSCC is an actively managed small-cap blend ETF that employs quantitative models for stock selection within the Russell 2000 universe, while IWM passively tracks the full Russell 2000 Index.
  • FSCC typically holds fewer securities with a higher expense ratio of 0.36%, compared to IWM’s broad diversification across approximately 2,000 holdings and lower expense ratio of 0.19%.
  • Both ETFs target U.S. small-capitalization equities, but FSCC’s active approach allows for potential outperformance through disciplined factor-based selection, whereas IWM provides comprehensive market-cap-weighted exposure.
  • FSCC’s strategy emphasizes risk-managed quantitative signals and may result in higher portfolio turnover, while IWM maintains low turnover consistent with passive indexing.
  • IWM offers superior liquidity and structural stability due to its long track record since 2000 and massive assets, contrasting with FSCC’s more recent inception in 2024.
  • Investors seeking cost efficiency and broad small-cap representation may prefer IWM, while those favoring active quantitative overlays within small caps may consider FSCC.

Introduction

Small-capitalization U.S. equities represent a distinct segment of the market with unique growth characteristics and higher volatility relative to large-cap benchmarks. Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) both provide exposure to this space but employ fundamentally different approaches. FSCC utilizes active quantitative management, while IWM delivers passive, rules-based replication of the Russell 2000 Index. The comparison helps investors evaluate trade-offs between active stock selection and broad index exposure within the same small-cap universe, particularly relevant amid ongoing sector rotation and economic cycle considerations.

Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC) Overview

The Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC) is an actively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in common stocks of small-capitalization U.S. companies, with at least 80% of assets allocated to small-cap securities. The fund employs a quantitative model integrating fundamental and technical variables to select holdings from the Russell 2000 Index universe, while maintaining diversification constraints and incorporating trading-cost considerations. FSCC maintains a small blend style and features a net expense ratio of 0.36%. As an active strategy, it may exhibit higher turnover than passive counterparts. The fund is relatively new, having launched in July 2024, and is offered by Federated Hermes.

iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) Overview

The iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the performance of the Russell 2000 Index, which measures the small-capitalization sector of the U.S. equity market. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the index’s component securities or substantially identical investments. IWM provides broad exposure across approximately 2,000 holdings with a market-cap-weighted methodology and maintains a small blend style. It carries a net expense ratio of 0.19% and exhibits low turnover typical of passive indexing. Launched in May 2000, IWM is sponsored by BlackRock’s iShares platform and benefits from substantial scale and liquidity.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

U.S. small-cap equities operate within a dynamic environment influenced by interest rate expectations, earnings growth differentials versus large caps, and broader economic cycles. Factors such as Federal Reserve policy shifts, inflation trends, and sector-specific developments in healthcare, financials, industrials, and technology can drive relative performance. Regulatory changes affecting smaller companies and capital allocation trends toward domestic equities also play roles. Both ETFs are positioned to capture small-cap beta, with risks including higher sensitivity to economic downturns and liquidity constraints compared to larger-cap benchmarks.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, small-cap segments have shown sensitivity to interest rate movements and sector rotations favoring value or growth factors. FSCC’s active quantitative approach may enable tactical adjustments to holdings based on model signals, potentially leading to differentiated results during periods of earnings dispersion or volatility. IWM, by contrast, delivers consistent market-cap exposure that reflects the full Russell 2000 composition, resulting in lower relative volatility in some environments due to its scale and diversification. Over broader timeframes, the passive structure of IWM has historically provided stable tracking with minimal deviation from the benchmark, while FSCC’s active management introduces the possibility of alpha generation alongside higher costs and turnover.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including lower expense ratio, broader diversification across thousands of holdings, established liquidity profile, and long operational history, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of preference to iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) for most investors seeking core small-cap exposure. FSCC offers potential advantages through active quantitative management but carries higher costs and a shorter track record.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FSCC vs. IWM commentary
Sep 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCC is a StrongBuy and IWM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWM has more net assets: 79.9B vs. FSCC (401M). IWM has a higher annual dividend yield than FSCC: IWM (20.417) vs FSCC (18.694). FSCC was incepted earlier than IWM: FSCC (2 years) vs IWM (26 years). IWM (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than FSCC (0.36). FSCC has a higher turnover IWM (18.00) vs IWM (18.00).
FSCCIWMFSCC / IWM
Gain YTD18.69420.41792%
Net Assets401M79.9B1%
Total Expense Ratio0.360.19189%
Turnover74.0018.00411%
Yield0.230.9025%
Fund Existence2 years26 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSCCIWM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSCC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IWM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TREMX9.85N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Emerging Europe
VMGRX24.85N/A
N/A
Vanguard Mid Cap Growth Inv
EVUYX20.26N/A
N/A
Allspring Util and Telecomms Inst
RUNTX31.11N/A
N/A
Russell Inv US Small Cap Equity M
BTMPX21.64N/A
N/A
iShares MSCI EAFE Intl Idx Inv P