FSLY
Price
$10.89
Change
+$0.40 (+3.81%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.63B
90 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QTWO
Price
$69.98
Change
+$0.48 (+0.69%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.37B
90 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSLY vs QTWO

Header iconFSLY vs QTWO Comparison
Open Charts FSLY vs QTWOBanner chart's image
Fastly
Price$10.89
Change+$0.40 (+3.81%)
Volume$30.3K
Capitalization1.63B
Q2 Holdings
Price$69.98
Change+$0.48 (+0.69%)
Volume$5.4K
Capitalization4.37B
FSLY vs QTWO Comparison Chart in %
FSLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QTWO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSLY vs. QTWO commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLY is a Hold and QTWO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (FSLY: $10.49 vs. QTWO: $69.96)
Brand notoriety: FSLY: Notable vs. QTWO: Not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSLY: 111% vs. QTWO: 64%
Market capitalization -- FSLY: $1.63B vs. QTWO: $4.37B
FSLY [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.63B. QTWO’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $4.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $276.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSLY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQTWO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FSLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QTWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSLY is a better buy in the long-term than QTWO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSLY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QTWO’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSLY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QTWO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FSLY and QTWO are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FSLY (@Packaged Software) experienced а -12.51% price change this week, while QTWO (@Packaged Software) price change was -4.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -5.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +47.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSLY is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

QTWO is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-5.18% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QTWO($4.38B) has a higher market cap than FSLY($1.63B). FSLY YTD gains are higher at: 15.466 vs. QTWO (-30.492). QTWO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 77.5M vs. FSLY (-59.56M). QTWO has more cash in the bank: 532M vs. FSLY (321M). FSLY has less debt than QTWO: FSLY (410M) vs QTWO (539M). QTWO has higher revenues than FSLY: QTWO (743M) vs FSLY (571M).
FSLYQTWOFSLY / QTWO
Capitalization1.63B4.38B37%
EBITDA-59.56M77.5M-77%
Gain YTD15.466-30.492-51%
P/E RatioN/A139.92-
Revenue571M743M77%
Total Cash321M532M60%
Total Debt410M539M76%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSLY vs QTWO: Fundamental Ratings
FSLY
QTWO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2219
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9287
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3758
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSLY's Valuation (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QTWO (82) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FSLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

FSLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as QTWO (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FSLY’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

QTWO's SMR Rating (87) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FSLY (92) in the null industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to FSLY’s over the last 12 months.

FSLY's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as QTWO (58) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FSLY’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

FSLY's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as QTWO (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FSLY’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSLYQTWO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QTWO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SLCCX39.68N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Large Cap Growth C
RPXIX30.88N/A
N/A
RiverPark Large Growth Institutional
VCIEX9.57N/A
N/A
VALIC Company I International Eqs Idx
GSCZX17.57N/A
N/A
GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Inv
IRFRX9.28-0.04
-0.43%
Cohen & Steers International Realty R

FSLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSLY has been loosely correlated with DDOG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSLY jumps, then DDOG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSLY
1D Price
Change %
FSLY100%
+3.91%
DDOG - FSLY
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
COIN - FSLY
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.72%
CLSK - FSLY
60%
Loosely correlated
-5.37%
QTWO - FSLY
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
RIOT - FSLY
58%
Loosely correlated
-4.23%
More

QTWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTWO has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QTWO jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTWO
1D Price
Change %
QTWO100%
+0.66%
FRSH - QTWO
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
ALKT - QTWO
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
COIN - QTWO
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.72%
PCOR - QTWO
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
WEAV - QTWO
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.93%
More