Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs HAGCX
FSMAX vs HAGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs HAGCX
FSMAX vs HAGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. HAGCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and HAGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. HAGCX (4.9B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than HAGCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs HAGCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than HAGCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs HAGCX (28 years). HAGCX (1.75) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). HAGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HAGCX: FSMAX (0) vs HAGCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.68 vs. HAGCX (-6.33). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.14 vs. HAGCX (-34.36).
| FSMAX | HAGCX | FSMAX / HAGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.75 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.75 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.937 | 8.342 | 203% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 4.9B | 819% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.68 | -6.33 | -374% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.74 | -3.87 | -1,877% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.14 | -34.36 | -117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 134.49 | 36.89 | 365% |