Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs HAGCX
FSMAX vs HAGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs HAGCX
FSMAX vs HAGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. HAGCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and HAGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. HAGCX (5.16B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than HAGCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs HAGCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than HAGCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs HAGCX (28 years). HAGCX (1.75) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). HAGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HAGCX: FSMAX (0) vs HAGCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. HAGCX (-4.08). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. HAGCX (-32.31).
| FSMAX | HAGCX | FSMAX / HAGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.75 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.75 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.427 | 8.712 | 177% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 5.16B | 828% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.23 | -4.08 | -716% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.83 | -3.40 | -2,173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.65 | -32.31 | -104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.47 | 50.18 | 306% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement