Ad is loading...
FSSAX vs WCMLX
FSSAX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts FSSAX vs WCMLX
Franklin Small Cap Growth Adv
Price$22.52
Change+$2.19 (+10.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$11.08
Change+$1.06 (+10.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.93M
FSSAX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSAX vs. WCMLX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSAX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSAX has more cash in the bank: 2.01B vs. WCMLX (39.9M). FSSAX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSSAX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: FSSAX (25 years) vs WCMLX (5 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FSSAX (0.84). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FSSAX (15.99). FSSAX (100000) and WCMLX (100000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -18.12 vs. WCMLX (-23.04). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 17.47 vs. FSSAX (8.02).
| FSSAX | WCMLX | FSSAX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.99 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.86 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -23.485 | -22.084 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 100000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.01B | 39.9M | 5,035% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.12 | -23.04 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.27 | -15.01 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.02 | 17.47 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.54 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...