Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSAX vs WCMLX
FSSAX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts FSSAX vs WCMLX
Franklin Small Cap Growth Adv
Price$25.40
Change+$0.20 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.43B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$12.40
Change+$0.16 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.48M
FSSAX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSAX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSAX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSAX has more cash in the bank: 2.43B vs. WCMLX (41.5M). FSSAX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSSAX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: FSSAX (25 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than FSSAX (0.84). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FSSAX (15.99). FSSAX (100000) and WCMLX (100000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.31 vs. WCMLX (-0.65). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 22.28 vs. FSSAX (4.26).
| FSSAX | WCMLX | FSSAX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.99 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.79 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.156 | -4.821 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 100000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.43B | 41.5M | 5,858% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.31 | -0.65 | -817% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.63 | 17.69 | 201% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.26 | 22.28 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement