12 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
FSTA vs MDLZ
FSTA vs MDLZ Comparison
Open Charts FSTA vs MDLZ
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples ETF
Price$49.12
Change+$0.06 (+0.12%)
Volume$200
Net Assets1.22B
Mondelez International
Price$56.85
Change+$0.54 (+0.96%)
Volume$2.79K
Capitalization94.25B
FSTA vs MDLZ Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTA vs. MDLZ commentary
Jan 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTA is a Buy and MDLZ is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MDLZ: Fundamental Ratings
MDLZ | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 6 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 35 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FSTA | MDLZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 90% | 16 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 76% | 16 days ago 45% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 16 days ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 16 days ago 49% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 73% | 16 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 69% | 16 days ago 44% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 79% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 72% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 69% | 16 days ago 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FSTA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSTA has been closely correlated with KO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSTA jumps, then KO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FSTA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSTA | 100% | -0.39% | ||
| KO - FSTA | 73% Closely correlated | -1.03% | ||
| PEP - FSTA | 71% Closely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| MDLZ - FSTA | 69% Closely correlated | -2.24% | ||
| CL - FSTA | 66% Closely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| PG - FSTA | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.87% | ||
More | ||||
MDLZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDLZ has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDLZ jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDLZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDLZ | 100% | -2.24% | ||
| GIS - MDLZ | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| HSY - MDLZ | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.60% | ||
| CAG - MDLZ | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.52% | ||
| CPB - MDLZ | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.95% | ||
| KHC - MDLZ | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.39% | ||
More | ||||