FSV
Price
$200.03
Change
+$2.69 (+1.36%)
Updated
Aug 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.02B
62 days until earnings call
LRHC
Price
$5.51
Change
+$0.31 (+5.96%)
Updated
Aug 22, 04:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.22M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSV vs LRHC

Header iconFSV vs LRHC Comparison
Open Charts FSV vs LRHCBanner chart's image
FirstService
Price$200.03
Change+$2.69 (+1.36%)
Volume$414
Capitalization9.02B
La Rosa Holdings
Price$5.51
Change+$0.31 (+5.96%)
Volume$100
Capitalization5.22M
FSV vs LRHC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LRHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSV vs. LRHC commentary
Aug 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSV is a Buy and LRHC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2025
Stock price -- (FSV: $197.34 vs. LRHC: $5.20)
Brand notoriety: FSV and LRHC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSV: 52% vs. LRHC: 0%
Market capitalization -- FSV: $9.02B vs. LRHC: $5.22M
FSV [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $9.02B. LRHC’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $5.22M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLRHC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FSV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LRHC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSV is a better buy in the long-term than LRHC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSV’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LRHC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSV’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • LRHC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LRHC is a better buy in the short-term than FSV.

Price Growth

FSV (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -1.16% price change this week, while LRHC (@Real Estate Development) price change was -9.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +0.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSV is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+0.72% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSV($9.02B) has a higher market cap than LRHC($5.23M). FSV YTD gains are higher at: 9.370 vs. LRHC (-92.302). FSV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 533M vs. LRHC (-103.2M). FSV has more cash in the bank: 202M vs. LRHC (2.85M). LRHC has less debt than FSV: LRHC (18.3M) vs FSV (1.55B). FSV has higher revenues than LRHC: FSV (5.43B) vs LRHC (73.9M).
FSVLRHCFSV / LRHC
Capitalization9.02B5.23M172,670%
EBITDA533M-103.2M-516%
Gain YTD9.370-92.302-10%
P/E Ratio63.25N/A-
Revenue5.43B73.9M7,345%
Total Cash202M2.85M7,078%
Total Debt1.55B18.3M8,464%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSV: Fundamental Ratings
FSV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
78
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
45
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
89
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSVLRHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LRHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CFIGX14.42N/A
N/A
Columbia Flexible Capital Income C
RAIRX28.82N/A
N/A
Manning & Napier Rainier Intl Discv Z
JWWCX120.58N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Global Research C
VDIPX29.58N/A
N/A
Vanguard Developed Markets Index Ins Pls
RTITX12.25-0.05
-0.41%
Russell Inv Multifactor Intl Eq M

FSV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSV has been loosely correlated with CIGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSV jumps, then CIGI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSV
1D Price
Change %
FSV100%
-0.99%
CIGI - FSV
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
CBRE - FSV
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.07%
JLL - FSV
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.47%
NMRK - FSV
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.29%
CWK - FSV
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
More

LRHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRHC has been loosely correlated with SHMSF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LRHC jumps, then SHMSF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LRHC
1D Price
Change %
LRHC100%
+0.19%
SHMSF - LRHC
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DOUG - LRHC
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
FSV - LRHC
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.99%
CWK - LRHC
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
JLL - LRHC
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.47%
More