FTEC
Price
$273.89
Change
-$6.09 (-2.18%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Net Assets
20.11B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LRNZ
Price
$61.92
Change
-$1.81 (-2.84%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Net Assets
40.3M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FTEC vs LRNZ

FTEC vs LRNZ Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) vs. TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ)

Key Takeaways

  • FTEC provides broad, passive exposure to the U.S. information technology sector through replication of the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology Index, while LRNZ employs an active, thematic strategy focused on companies leveraging artificial intelligence and deep learning.
  • FTEC holds approximately 280–300 securities with significant concentration in mega-cap leaders such as NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA), Apple Inc. (AAPL), and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT); LRNZ maintains a concentrated portfolio of 20–30 holdings selected for AI relevance.
  • The expense ratio of FTEC stands at 0.08%, reflecting its low-cost passive structure, whereas LRNZ charges 0.68%–0.69% due to active management and specialized research.
  • FTEC delivers diversified sector exposure almost entirely within information technology, including semiconductors and software; LRNZ emphasizes a narrower subset of technology companies with explicit AI and machine-learning competitive advantages.
  • Both ETFs target technology-driven growth but differ markedly in risk profile: FTEC offers broader diversification and lower costs, while LRNZ introduces higher concentration risk alongside targeted thematic upside potential.
  • In the current environment of sustained artificial intelligence investment, FTEC suits investors seeking scalable, low-cost technology beta, whereas LRNZ appeals to those pursuing concentrated exposure to AI innovation leaders.

Introduction

Investors seeking technology sector exposure face a choice between broad market representation and specialized thematic strategies. The Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) and the TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) both provide access to technology equities yet follow fundamentally different approaches. FTEC offers low-cost, rules-based coverage of the entire U.S. information technology sector, while LRNZ applies active management to select companies with meaningful artificial intelligence involvement. The comparison highlights structural trade-offs between diversification and thematic precision within the same overarching sector.

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) Overview

The Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology Index before fees and expenses. The fund holds roughly 280–300 securities, providing broad representation across the U.S. information technology sector. Top holdings typically include NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA), Apple Inc. (AAPL), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT), Broadcom Inc. (AVGO), and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU), which together account for a substantial portion of assets. Sector allocation is concentrated almost entirely in information technology, with meaningful weights in semiconductors, software, and hardware. The expense ratio is 0.08%. As a traditional index-tracking ETF, FTEC employs full replication with periodic rebalancing aligned to index changes. The structure emphasizes liquidity and cost efficiency for long-term sector exposure.

TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) Overview

The TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) is an actively managed exchange-traded fund that invests in a concentrated portfolio of technology companies significantly involved in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning applications. The fund generally holds 20–30 positions, selected based on the manager’s assessment of competitive advantages derived from these technologies. Top holdings commonly feature companies such as NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA), CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. (CRWD), Cloudflare Inc. (NET), and other AI-focused firms. Sector exposure centers on electronic technology and technology services, with additional allocation to health technology where AI applications are prominent. The expense ratio is 0.68%–0.69%. LRNZ follows a discretionary active strategy without a benchmark index, allowing flexibility in security selection and weighting to emphasize thematic AI exposure.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector continues to benefit from sustained capital investment in artificial intelligence infrastructure, data centers, and enterprise software solutions. Semiconductor demand remains elevated due to training and inference workloads, while software providers integrating AI capabilities experience accelerated adoption across industries. Regulatory developments around data privacy, export controls on advanced chips, and antitrust scrutiny of large technology platforms represent ongoing considerations. Macroeconomic factors including interest rate trajectories and corporate capital expenditure budgets influence near-term sentiment, yet the structural shift toward AI-driven productivity gains provides a durable tailwind for both broad technology and specialized AI strategies.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, FTEC has delivered returns aligned with the broader technology sector, benefiting from the performance of its largest constituents during periods of semiconductor strength and software growth. Its diversified holdings provide a measure of resilience during rotations away from mega-cap names. LRNZ, with its concentrated active approach, has exhibited greater sensitivity to AI-specific news flow and earnings momentum among its holdings, resulting in higher volatility relative to broad technology benchmarks. In environments favoring thematic leadership, LRNZ can capture outsized gains from AI innovators; during broader sector pullbacks, its narrower focus may amplify downside moves. Relative positioning therefore depends on an investor’s preference for diversified sector beta versus concentrated thematic conviction.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to refine your ETF and equity research process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural strength, cost efficiency, and broad diversification, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of suitability to the Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) for most investors seeking technology exposure. Its low expense ratio and extensive holdings reduce single-stock risk while capturing sector-wide trends. The TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) offers compelling thematic focus but carries higher costs and concentration risk that may suit only those with strong conviction in AI leadership outperformance.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FTEC vs. LRNZ commentary
Jul 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTEC is a Hold and LRNZ is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTEC has more net assets: 20.1B vs. LRNZ (40.3M). LRNZ has a higher annual dividend yield than FTEC: LRNZ (29.934) vs FTEC (22.159). FTEC was incepted earlier than LRNZ: FTEC (13 years) vs LRNZ (6 years). FTEC (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than LRNZ (0.69). LRNZ has a higher turnover FTEC (9.00) vs FTEC (9.00).
FTECLRNZFTEC / LRNZ
Gain YTD22.15929.93474%
Net Assets20.1B40.3M49,876%
Total Expense Ratio0.080.6912%
Turnover9.0028.0032%
Yield0.350.00-
Fund Existence13 years6 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTECLRNZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FTEC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LRNZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSFO10.750.12
+1.17%
YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF
DNP10.840.06
+0.56%
DNP Select Income Fund
SCMC24.970.01
+0.04%
Sterling Capital Multi-Strat Inc ETF
EVN11.18-0.03
-0.27%
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trust
QCAP24.76-0.07
-0.28%
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Cnsrv Buffr ETF - Apr

FTEC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTEC has been closely correlated with AVGO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTEC jumps, then AVGO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTEC
1D Price
Change %
FTEC100%
-2.18%
AVGO - FTEC
70%
Closely correlated
N/A
ONTO - FTEC
65%
Loosely correlated
-12.46%
COHR - FTEC
61%
Loosely correlated
-9.57%
FN - FTEC
60%
Loosely correlated
-8.69%
CDNS - FTEC
60%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

LRNZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRNZ has been closely correlated with NET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LRNZ jumps, then NET could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LRNZ
1D Price
Change %
LRNZ100%
-2.83%
NET - LRNZ
68%
Closely correlated
-1.58%
SNOW - LRNZ
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
TWLO - LRNZ
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.01%
AI - LRNZ
56%
Loosely correlated
-3.92%
VRNS - LRNZ
55%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More