Investors seeking technology sector exposure face a choice between broad market representation and specialized thematic strategies. The Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) and the TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) both provide access to technology equities yet follow fundamentally different approaches. FTEC offers low-cost, rules-based coverage of the entire U.S. information technology sector, while LRNZ applies active management to select companies with meaningful artificial intelligence involvement. The comparison highlights structural trade-offs between diversification and thematic precision within the same overarching sector.
The Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology Index before fees and expenses. The fund holds roughly 280–300 securities, providing broad representation across the U.S. information technology sector. Top holdings typically include NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA), Apple Inc. (AAPL), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT), Broadcom Inc. (AVGO), and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU), which together account for a substantial portion of assets. Sector allocation is concentrated almost entirely in information technology, with meaningful weights in semiconductors, software, and hardware. The expense ratio is 0.08%. As a traditional index-tracking ETF, FTEC employs full replication with periodic rebalancing aligned to index changes. The structure emphasizes liquidity and cost efficiency for long-term sector exposure.
The TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) is an actively managed exchange-traded fund that invests in a concentrated portfolio of technology companies significantly involved in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning applications. The fund generally holds 20–30 positions, selected based on the manager’s assessment of competitive advantages derived from these technologies. Top holdings commonly feature companies such as NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA), CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. (CRWD), Cloudflare Inc. (NET), and other AI-focused firms. Sector exposure centers on electronic technology and technology services, with additional allocation to health technology where AI applications are prominent. The expense ratio is 0.68%–0.69%. LRNZ follows a discretionary active strategy without a benchmark index, allowing flexibility in security selection and weighting to emphasize thematic AI exposure.
The technology sector continues to benefit from sustained capital investment in artificial intelligence infrastructure, data centers, and enterprise software solutions. Semiconductor demand remains elevated due to training and inference workloads, while software providers integrating AI capabilities experience accelerated adoption across industries. Regulatory developments around data privacy, export controls on advanced chips, and antitrust scrutiny of large technology platforms represent ongoing considerations. Macroeconomic factors including interest rate trajectories and corporate capital expenditure budgets influence near-term sentiment, yet the structural shift toward AI-driven productivity gains provides a durable tailwind for both broad technology and specialized AI strategies.
Over recent market cycles, FTEC has delivered returns aligned with the broader technology sector, benefiting from the performance of its largest constituents during periods of semiconductor strength and software growth. Its diversified holdings provide a measure of resilience during rotations away from mega-cap names. LRNZ, with its concentrated active approach, has exhibited greater sensitivity to AI-specific news flow and earnings momentum among its holdings, resulting in higher volatility relative to broad technology benchmarks. In environments favoring thematic leadership, LRNZ can capture outsized gains from AI innovators; during broader sector pullbacks, its narrower focus may amplify downside moves. Relative positioning therefore depends on an investor’s preference for diversified sector beta versus concentrated thematic conviction.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to refine your ETF and equity research process.
Based on structural strength, cost efficiency, and broad diversification, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of suitability to the Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) for most investors seeking technology exposure. Its low expense ratio and extensive holdings reduce single-stock risk while capturing sector-wide trends. The TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) offers compelling thematic focus but carries higher costs and concentration risk that may suit only those with strong conviction in AI leadership outperformance.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| FTEC | LRNZ | FTEC / LRNZ | |
| Gain YTD | 22.159 | 29.934 | 74% |
| Net Assets | 20.1B | 40.3M | 49,876% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.69 | 12% |
| Turnover | 9.00 | 28.00 | 32% |
| Yield | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
| FTEC | LRNZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 88% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MSFO | 10.75 | 0.12 | +1.17% |
| YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF | |||
| DNP | 10.84 | 0.06 | +0.56% |
| DNP Select Income Fund | |||
| SCMC | 24.97 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| Sterling Capital Multi-Strat Inc ETF | |||
| EVN | 11.18 | -0.03 | -0.27% |
| Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trust | |||
| QCAP | 24.76 | -0.07 | -0.28% |
| FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Cnsrv Buffr ETF - Apr | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTEC has been closely correlated with AVGO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTEC jumps, then AVGO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTEC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTEC | 100% | -2.18% | ||
| AVGO - FTEC | 70% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| ONTO - FTEC | 65% Loosely correlated | -12.46% | ||
| COHR - FTEC | 61% Loosely correlated | -9.57% | ||
| FN - FTEC | 60% Loosely correlated | -8.69% | ||
| CDNS - FTEC | 60% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRNZ has been closely correlated with NET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LRNZ jumps, then NET could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LRNZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRNZ | 100% | -2.83% | ||
| NET - LRNZ | 68% Closely correlated | -1.58% | ||
| SNOW - LRNZ | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.40% | ||
| TWLO - LRNZ | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| AI - LRNZ | 56% Loosely correlated | -3.92% | ||
| VRNS - LRNZ | 55% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||