FTEC
Price
$275.02
Change
-$2.01 (-0.73%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Net Assets
20.29B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QTUM
Price
$159.89
Change
-$3.45 (-2.11%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Net Assets
6.21B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FTEC vs QTUM

FTEC vs QTUM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) vs. Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM)

Key Takeaways

  • FTEC provides broad, diversified exposure to the U.S. information technology sector with approximately 286 holdings and a low expense ratio of 0.08%, emphasizing mega-cap leaders like NVDA and AAPL.
  • QTUM offers thematic focus on quantum computing and machine learning via 86 global holdings tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, with a higher expense ratio of 0.40% and more balanced weighting.
  • FTEC's sector allocation is overwhelmingly technology (98.5%), delivering cost-efficient stability, while QTUM diversifies into industrials (10%) and communication services (6%) for niche innovation exposure.
  • QTUM has demonstrated higher volatility but stronger relative performance in recent innovation-driven market cycles compared to FTEC's consistent broad tech trends.
  • Both ETFs benefit from technology sector momentum, but FTEC prioritizes liquidity and low costs, suiting core allocations, while QTUM targets high-growth thematic opportunities.
  • Structural differences highlight FTEC's passive broad-market approach versus QTUM's modified equal-weighted strategy for emerging quantum and AI technologies.

Introduction

In the evolving technology landscape, investors increasingly seek targeted exposure to both established sector leaders and emerging innovations like quantum computing and machine learning. FTEC and QTUM represent complementary strategies within the technology ETF comparison space. FTEC delivers comprehensive U.S. information technology sector coverage, capturing mega-cap driven growth in semiconductors, software, and hardware. QTUM, by contrast, provides alternative exposure through a thematic lens on quantum and machine learning technologies, blending global firms advancing next-generation computing. These ETFs do not compete directly but offer distinct risk-return profiles for investors balancing broad sector stability with high-potential innovation plays amid AI acceleration and sector rotation trends.

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) Overview

The Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) is a passively managed fund that seeks to track the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, representing the performance of the U.S. information technology sector across large-, mid-, and small-cap stocks. Launched in October 2013, it holds approximately 286 securities, providing broad diversification within technology.

Top holdings include NVDA (18.8%), AAPL (14.3%), MSFT (9.9%), AVGO (4.9%), and MU (3.5%), with the top 10 comprising about 59% of assets. Sector allocation is dominated by technology at 98.5%, with minor exposures to communication services (0.5%), financial services (0.5%), and industrials (0.4%).

Its ultralow expense ratio of 0.08% enhances cost efficiency, and the fund rebalances in line with the index methodology. FTEC's structure suits investors seeking liquid, non-diversified yet comprehensive tech exposure without active management overlays.

Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) Overview

The Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) is a passively managed ETF launched in September 2018, designed to track the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. This modified equal-weighted index targets global companies deriving at least 50% of revenue from quantum computing, machine learning hardware, software, or related technologies.

With around 86 holdings, QTUM maintains balanced positioning. Top holdings feature INTC (2.4-3.0%), MU (2.4-2.8%), STMicroelectronics NV (STM) (2.1%), Nokia Oyj (NOK) (2.1%), and Global Unichip Corp. (2.0-2.5%), with the top 10 accounting for roughly 20% of assets.

Sector breakdown shows technology at 82.5%, industrials (10.1%), communication services (5.9%), and smaller allocations to consumer cyclical (0.9%) and healthcare (0.8%). The expense ratio stands at 0.40%, reflecting its specialized thematic focus. QTUM rebalances periodically to capture evolving quantum and ML ecosystem participants, offering targeted innovation exposure.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector remains a cornerstone of equity markets, propelled by AI adoption, semiconductor advancements, and cloud infrastructure expansion. Broader macro drivers like stabilizing interest rates and robust corporate earnings cycles favor established tech giants, while capital flows increasingly target niche themes such as quantum computing amid breakthroughs in hardware scalability and error correction.

Quantum computing, projected to grow at over 25% CAGR through 2046 per industry forecasts, benefits from regulatory support, government R&D funding, and private investments exceeding billions annually. Sector risks include valuation stretches in mega-caps, supply chain disruptions in semiconductors, and geopolitical tensions affecting global tech supply. Both ETFs navigate this environment, with FTEC anchored in proven leaders and QTUM positioned for disruptive quantum and machine learning catalysts.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, FTEC has delivered steady gains tied to mega-cap tech dominance and semiconductor momentum, with year-to-date returns around 19.6% and one-year gains near 59%, reflecting lower volatility suited to broad sector rotation. Its positioning benefits from consistent earnings growth in top holdings like NVDA and MSFT, amid favorable interest rate expectations.

QTUM has exhibited higher volatility but superior relative performance in innovation-fueled periods, posting YTD returns of approximately 32% and one-year advances over 80%, driven by quantum hardware and ML chip demand. This outperformance stems from thematic tailwinds like AI infrastructure buildout and quantum milestones, though it amplifies drawdowns during risk-off phases. FTEC offers smoother relative positioning for core tech exposure, while QTUM captures upside from emerging trends with elevated beta.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes. Explore it today to enhance your ETF comparison and sector exposure analysis.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors FTEC with higher probability due to its superior cost efficiency (0.08% expense ratio), extensive diversification (286 holdings), superior liquidity, and consistent trend alignment with broad technology sector momentum. While QTUM offers compelling thematic upside in quantum and machine learning, its higher fees, volatility, and narrower focus introduce elevated risk. This verdict emphasizes structural strengths and risk-adjusted positioning over short-term outperformance.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FTEC vs. QTUM commentary
Jun 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTEC is a Hold and QTUM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTEC has more net assets: 20.3B vs. QTUM (6.21B). QTUM has a higher annual dividend yield than FTEC: QTUM (46.342) vs FTEC (22.663). FTEC was incepted earlier than QTUM: FTEC (13 years) vs QTUM (8 years). FTEC (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than QTUM (0.40). QTUM has a higher turnover FTEC (9.00) vs FTEC (9.00).
FTECQTUMFTEC / QTUM
Gain YTD22.66346.34249%
Net Assets20.3B6.21B327%
Total Expense Ratio0.080.4021%
Turnover9.0042.0021%
Yield0.330.7345%
Fund Existence13 years8 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTECQTUM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FTEC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QTUM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VALQ68.540.17
+0.25%
American Century® U.S. Quality Value ETF
JNEU32.70-0.08
-0.24%
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 UncJunETF
BRLN50.84-0.13
-0.26%
iShares Floating Rate Loan Active ETF
NELS28.16-0.11
-0.40%
Nelson Select ETF
URNM54.29-1.40
-2.51%
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF

QTUM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTUM has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTUM jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTUM
1D Price
Change %
QTUM100%
-1.95%
LRCX - QTUM
79%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
AMAT - QTUM
74%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
MKSI - QTUM
74%
Closely correlated
-1.94%
TSM - QTUM
74%
Closely correlated
+1.02%
KLAC - QTUM
73%
Closely correlated
-1.64%
More