FTEC
Price
$277.79
Change
-$4.83 (-1.71%)
Updated
Aug 24 closing price
Net Assets
21.01B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XNTK
Price
$351.37
Change
-$5.94 (-1.66%)
Updated
Aug 24 closing price
Net Assets
1.98B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FTEC vs XNTK

FTEC vs XNTK Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) vs. SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK)

Key Takeaways

  • Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) offers broad, market-cap-weighted exposure to approximately 280-290 U.S. information technology stocks with an expense ratio of 0.08%, providing diversified access across large-cap leaders and smaller technology names.
  • SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) delivers concentrated exposure to roughly 35-37 technology companies through an equal-weighted approach, resulting in higher volatility potential and a higher expense ratio of 0.35%.
  • Both ETFs focus on the technology sector, yet FTEC emphasizes mega-cap names such as NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT, while XNTK tilts toward semiconductor and equipment firms including MU, INTC, and AMD.
  • FTEC provides greater diversification and lower costs, making it structurally suited for long-term core holdings, whereas XNTK suits investors seeking amplified exposure to specific technology sub-sectors.
  • Expense ratio differences create a persistent cost advantage for FTEC, which can compound meaningfully over multi-year horizons in a sector driven by earnings growth and innovation cycles.
  • Both funds benefit from ongoing technology sector momentum tied to artificial intelligence, semiconductors, and digital infrastructure, though their differing concentration levels produce distinct risk-return profiles.

Introduction

Investors seeking technology sector exposure often compare specialized ETFs that target the same broad industry yet employ different construction methodologies. Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) and SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) both track U.S.-listed technology companies but diverge in breadth, weighting schemes, and cost structures. These differences make the pair relevant for investors evaluating trade-offs between diversification and concentration within the information technology sector amid sustained demand for semiconductors, software, and hardware solutions.

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) Overview

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) is a passively managed fund that seeks to track the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. The ETF holds approximately 280-290 stocks, delivering broad representation across the U.S. technology sector. Top holdings typically include NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AVGO, and MU, with the top ten positions accounting for roughly 60% of assets. Sector allocation remains overwhelmingly concentrated in technology at approximately 98-99%, with negligible exposure elsewhere. The fund features a low expense ratio of 0.08% and employs market-capitalization weighting with periodic rebalancing to maintain alignment with the underlying index. Its structure emphasizes liquidity and scalability through a large asset base and high trading volume.

SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) Overview

SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) is a passively managed fund designed to track the NYSE Technology Index, which comprises approximately 35-37 leading U.S.-listed technology companies. The ETF applies an equal-weighted methodology, resulting in a more concentrated portfolio compared with broader benchmarks. Prominent holdings often feature MU, INTC, MRVL, AMD, AMAT, and LRCX, with the top ten holdings representing a substantial portion of assets. Technology comprises about 84-85% of the portfolio, supplemented by smaller allocations to consumer cyclical and communication services sectors. The fund carries an expense ratio of 0.35% and rebalances periodically to preserve equal weighting across constituents. Its smaller asset base and focused holdings profile contribute to distinct liquidity and volatility characteristics.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector continues to experience structural tailwinds from artificial intelligence adoption, semiconductor demand, cloud computing expansion, and digital transformation initiatives across industries. Capital flows into technology equities remain elevated as companies invest in infrastructure supporting generative AI and advanced computing. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate trajectories and corporate capital expenditure cycles influence sector performance, while regulatory developments around data privacy, export controls on advanced chips, and antitrust scrutiny introduce periodic volatility. Supply chain resilience and geopolitical considerations also shape investment flows within semiconductors and hardware sub-sectors that feature prominently in both ETFs.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ETFs have reflected broader technology sector momentum driven by earnings growth in semiconductors and software. FTEC’s broader diversification and market-cap weighting have historically produced more moderate volatility relative to more concentrated peers. XNTK’s equal-weighted approach and emphasis on semiconductor equipment and memory companies have amplified sensitivity to cyclical upswings and downturns in those niches. During periods of sector rotation or shifts in interest rate expectations, the concentrated positioning in XNTK can lead to sharper relative moves compared with FTEC’s more balanced exposure across the technology value chain. Over longer horizons, cost efficiency and diversification have supported FTEC’s relative positioning for investors prioritizing consistent sector participation.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors comparing technology ETFs can leverage the tool to evaluate additional candidates aligned with their objectives.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including lower expense ratio, greater number of holdings, and broader diversification across the technology sector, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign higher probabilistic favorability to Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) for investors seeking efficient, core exposure. SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) may appeal in scenarios prioritizing concentrated bets on specific sub-sectors, though its higher costs and narrower profile introduce elevated risk considerations.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FTEC vs. XNTK commentary
Aug 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTEC is a Hold and XNTK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTEC has more net assets: 21B vs. XNTK (1.98B). XNTK has a higher annual dividend yield than FTEC: XNTK (26.559) vs FTEC (23.899). FTEC was incepted earlier than XNTK: FTEC (13 years) vs XNTK (26 years). FTEC (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than XNTK (0.35). XNTK has a higher turnover FTEC (9.00) vs FTEC (9.00).
FTECXNTKFTEC / XNTK
Gain YTD23.89926.55990%
Net Assets21B1.98B1,060%
Total Expense Ratio0.080.3524%
Turnover9.0016.0056%
Yield0.370.16234%
Fund Existence13 years26 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTECXNTK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FTEC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XNTK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RTYY8.980.07
+0.79%
GraniteShares YieldBOOST RIOT ETF
REM22.050.03
+0.14%
iShares Mortgage Real Estate Capped ETF
XMAR43.310.02
+0.05%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Enh & ModBufETF-Mar
QULL70.67N/A
N/A
ETRACS 2x Lvrgd MSCI US Qlty Fctr TR ETN
DON58.26N/A
N/A
WisdomTree US MidCap Dividend ETF

FTEC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTEC has been closely correlated with ONTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTEC jumps, then ONTO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTEC
1D Price
Change %
FTEC100%
-1.71%
ONTO - FTEC
70%
Closely correlated
-3.55%
AMKR - FTEC
68%
Closely correlated
-4.70%
COHR - FTEC
66%
Closely correlated
-4.85%
VSH - FTEC
66%
Loosely correlated
-3.79%
GLW - FTEC
63%
Loosely correlated
-2.86%
More

XNTK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XNTK has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XNTK jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XNTK
1D Price
Change %
XNTK100%
-1.66%
TSM - XNTK
78%
Closely correlated
-2.11%
ADI - XNTK
73%
Closely correlated
-0.51%
ABNB - XNTK
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.55%
SE - XNTK
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.57%
SNOW - XNTK
55%
Loosely correlated
-3.00%
More