FTXG
Price
$22.68
Change
-$0.17 (-0.74%)
Updated
Jun 15, 11:59 AM (EDT)
Net Assets
24.01M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XLP
Price
$85.38
Change
-$0.44 (-0.51%)
Updated
Jun 15, 12:34 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
14.67B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FTXG vs XLP

Header iconFTXG vs XLP Comparison
Open Charts FTXG vs XLPBanner chart's image
FTXG vs XLP Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF (FTXG) vs. State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP)

Key Takeaways

  • FTXG targets a niche food and beverage segment using a smart beta strategy with multi-factor weighting, holding around 30 stocks, while XLP provides broad consumer staples exposure via market-cap weighting with about 36 holdings.
  • XLP features significantly lower costs at 0.08% expense ratio compared to FTXG's 0.60%, enhancing long-term cost efficiency for investors.
  • Top holdings differ markedly: FTXG emphasizes producers like ADM (9%), MDLZ (8%), and KO (8%); XLP favors retailers such as WMT (12%) and COST (9%).
  • Both ETFs offer defensive positioning in consumer staples, but XLP's broader diversification across subsectors like household products and tobacco reduces concentration risk versus FTXG's focused exposure.
  • Recent market cycles highlight XLP's steadier relative positioning due to retail strength, while FTXG shows higher sensitivity to commodity input costs and food production earnings.
  • Liquidity favors XLP with substantial trading volume and AUM (assets under management, total value of fund assets), supporting tighter spreads for large investors.

Introduction

FTXG and XLP represent complementary approaches within the resilient consumer staples sector, ideal for investors seeking stability amid market volatility. FTXG offers targeted exposure to U.S. food and beverage companies through a smart beta lens, appealing to those betting on niche growth in essentials like snacks and agribusiness. In contrast, XLP delivers comprehensive sector coverage, including retailers and household goods giants from the S&P 500 Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. These ETFs compete indirectly, with FTXG providing alternative, concentrated plays versus XLP's diversified benchmark tracking. In the current environment of interest rate uncertainty and sector rotation toward defensives, comparing their structures reveals options for precise ETF positioning in portfolio allocation strategies.

First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF (FTXG) Overview

The First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF (FTXG) is a passively managed smart beta fund launched in 2016, tracking the Nasdaq US Smart Food & Beverage Index. This index selects 30-50 U.S. companies in food and beverage—brewers, distillers, manufacturers, distributors, and retailers—based on liquidity screens, then applies multi-factor weighting emphasizing value metrics like earnings and cash flow yields alongside volatility considerations. The fund holds approximately 30 stocks, with top holdings including ADM (~9%), MDLZ (~8%), KO (~8%), PEP (~8%), and KHC (~8%). Sector allocation is heavily tilted toward consumer defensive (~94%), with minor basic materials exposure from agribusiness like CTVA. The expense ratio stands at 0.60%, reflecting active-like factor tilts. Quarterly rebalancing maintains the methodology, distinguishing FTXG as a thematic, non-market-cap weighted option for food-specific sector exposure.

State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) Overview

The State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP), inception 1998, passively tracks the S&P Consumer Staples Select Sector Index, comprising consumer staples companies from the S&P 500. This market-cap weighted benchmark includes food retail, beverages, household products, tobacco, and personal care, with ~36 holdings for broad representation. Top holdings are dominated by retailers and giants: WMT (12.05%), COST (9.44%), PG (7.17%), KO (6.40%), and PM (5.61%). Subsector allocations: consumer staples distribution & retail (~34%), beverages (~20%), food products (~17%), household products (~16%), tobacco (~10%). With a low 0.08% expense ratio, XLP rebalances quarterly to align with S&P 500 changes, offering high liquidity and benchmark-like purity as a core sector holding.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The consumer staples sector, encompassing essential goods like food, beverages, and household items, thrives on inelastic demand, positioning it as a defensive haven during economic uncertainty. In recent market cycles, staples have attracted inflows amid volatility spikes and tech sector fatigue, with fiscal stimulus and potential rate easing supporting demand. Food and beverage subsegments face input cost pressures from commodities but benefit from innovation in value offerings and events like global sports. Regulatory focus on supply chains and tariffs adds risks, yet staples' stability—bolstered by dividend payers—drives capital flows. Both FTXG and XLP navigate this via producers/retailers, with XLP capturing broader retail resilience and FTXG riding food-specific trends like fiber-enriched products.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent months, XLP has demonstrated superior relative positioning, benefiting from robust earnings in retail heavyweights like WMT and COST amid consumer shifts to value shopping. Its diversification tempers volatility, aligning with sector rotation into defensives during interest rate fluctuations. FTXG, more exposed to producers like ADM, exhibits greater swings tied to commodity trends and agribusiness cycles, lagging in broad rallies but potentially gaining in food inflation scenarios. Both show low betas (~0.6), but XLP's liquidity and lower drawdowns in choppy periods underscore its structural edge, while FTXG appeals for factor-driven alpha in niche recoveries.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (total market value of a company's shares), technical indicators like moving averages, price patterns including breakouts, and performance metrics like relative strength. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes. Explore it today to refine your ETF comparison workflows.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors XLP due to its superior cost efficiency, broader diversification, higher liquidity, and consistent trend strength in recent defensive rotations. While FTXG's smart beta tilt offers potential in food-specific momentum, XLP's market-cap structure and lower risk exposure provide a probabilistic edge (~65% preference) for most sector allocations, absent targeted thematic convictions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FTXG vs. XLP commentary
Jun 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTXG is a Buy and XLP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLP has more net assets: 14.7B vs. FTXG (24M). XLP has a higher annual dividend yield than FTXG: XLP (11.101) vs FTXG (9.532). FTXG was incepted earlier than XLP: FTXG (10 years) vs XLP (28 years). XLP (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than FTXG (0.60). FTXG has a higher turnover XLP (8.00) vs XLP (8.00).
FTXGXLPFTXG / XLP
Gain YTD9.53211.10186%
Net Assets24M14.7B0%
Total Expense Ratio0.600.08750%
Turnover20.008.00250%
Yield2.742.62104%
Fund Existence10 years28 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTXGXLP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FTXG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XLP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TVTX52.043.13
+6.40%
Travere Therapeutics
TBI6.980.11
+1.60%
Trueblue
OKE90.591.39
+1.56%
Oneok
COOT0.64-0.04
-5.48%
Australian Oilseeds Holdings Limited
SHAZ62.32-9.19
-12.85%
SharonAI Holdings Inc.

FTXG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTXG has been closely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTXG jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTXG
1D Price
Change %
FTXG100%
+0.81%
GIS - FTXG
71%
Closely correlated
+2.04%
MDLZ - FTXG
71%
Closely correlated
-0.58%
PEP - FTXG
70%
Closely correlated
+0.38%
CAG - FTXG
70%
Closely correlated
+2.16%
KHC - FTXG
68%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
More

XLP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLP has been closely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLP jumps, then CL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XLP
1D Price
Change %
XLP100%
+0.65%
CL - XLP
73%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
PG - XLP
71%
Closely correlated
+0.86%
MDLZ - XLP
66%
Closely correlated
-0.58%
PEP - XLP
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
CHD - XLP
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
More