FULT
Price
$24.33
Change
-$0.01 (-0.04%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
4.66B
78 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ONBPP
Price
$25.08
Change
-$0.01 (-0.04%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FULT vs ONBPP

FULT vs ONBPP Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FULT vs. ONBPP commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FULT is a StrongBuy and ONBPP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (FULT: $24.33 vs. ONBPP: $25.08)
Brand notoriety: FULT and ONBPP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FULT: 58% vs. ONBPP: 51%
Market capitalization -- FULT: $4.66B vs. ONBPP: $0
FULT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.66B. ONBPP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FULT’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileONBPP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FULT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • ONBPP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than ONBPP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FULT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ONBPP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FULT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • ONBPP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ONBPP is a better buy in the short-term than FULT.

Price Growth

FULT (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.98% price change this week, while ONBPP (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

FULT is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FULT YTD gains are higher at: 28.058 vs. ONBPP (4.222). ONBPP has more cash in the bank: 537M vs. FULT (312M). FULT has less debt than ONBPP: FULT (1.25B) vs ONBPP (7.91B). ONBPP has higher revenues than FULT: ONBPP (2.82B) vs FULT (1.33B).
FULTONBPPFULT / ONBPP
Capitalization4.66BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD28.0584.222665%
P/E Ratio11.70N/A-
Revenue1.33B2.82B47%
Total Cash312M537M58%
Total Debt1.25B7.91B16%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FULT: Fundamental Ratings
FULT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
71
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
33
SMR RATING
1..100
24
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULTONBPP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
16%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
8%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
25%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
12%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
12%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
14%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
3%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
9%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FULT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ONBPP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSSD25.050.04
+0.16%
Cohen & Steers Sh Dur Pref & Inc Act ETF
EMHY40.230.04
+0.10%
iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yld Bd ETF
IBID25.72-0.01
-0.02%
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term Tips ETF
SMCF40.33-0.09
-0.22%
Themes US Small Cp CA Flw Champ ETF
ESGD104.70-0.64
-0.61%
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF

FULT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULT has been closely correlated with ASB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FULT jumps, then ASB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FULT
1D Price
Change %
FULT100%
-0.04%
ASB - FULT
90%
Closely correlated
+0.39%
ONB - FULT
89%
Closely correlated
+0.87%
UBSI - FULT
89%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
UCB - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
AUB - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
More

ONBPP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONBPP has been loosely correlated with FHN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ONBPP jumps, then FHN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ONBPP
1D Price
Change %
ONBPP100%
-0.06%
FHN - ONBPP
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
WAL - ONBPP
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.94%
RBB - ONBPP
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.03%
FULT - ONBPP
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
BKU - ONBPP
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
More