FULT
Price
$21.23
Change
-$0.45 (-2.07%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.15B
48 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ONBPP
Price
$24.85
Change
-$0.10 (-0.40%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:38 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FULT vs ONBPP

Header iconFULT vs ONBPP Comparison
Open Charts FULT vs ONBPPBanner chart's image
FULT vs ONBPP Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FULT vs. ONBPP commentary
Jun 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FULT is a Buy and ONBPP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 04, 2026
Stock price -- (FULT: $21.69 vs. ONBPP: $24.95)
Brand notoriety: FULT and ONBPP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FULT: 91% vs. ONBPP: 18%
Market capitalization -- FULT: $4.15B vs. ONBPP: $0
FULT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.15B. ONBPP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FULT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileONBPP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FULT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ONBPP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than ONBPP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FULT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ONBPP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FULT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ONBPP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the short-term than ONBPP.

Price Growth

FULT (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.37% price change this week, while ONBPP (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

FULT is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.84% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FULT YTD gains are higher at: 13.267 vs. ONBPP (3.682). ONBPP has more cash in the bank: 537M vs. FULT (271M). FULT has less debt than ONBPP: FULT (1.25B) vs ONBPP (7.36B). ONBPP has higher revenues than FULT: ONBPP (2.74B) vs FULT (1.33B).
FULTONBPPFULT / ONBPP
Capitalization4.15BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.2673.682360%
P/E Ratio10.33N/A-
Revenue1.33B2.74B48%
Total Cash271M537M50%
Total Debt1.25B7.36B17%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FULT: Fundamental Ratings
FULT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
81
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
48
SMR RATING
1..100
23
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULTONBPP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
15%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
6%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FULT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ONBPP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBMS25.880.04
+0.17%
iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Mun Bd ETF
JMUB50.410.07
+0.14%
JPMorgan Municipal ETF
LCLG74.00N/A
N/A
Logan Capital Broad Innovative Gr ETF
VGM10.17-0.13
-1.26%
Invesco Trust Investment Grade Municipals
DZZ1.96-0.08
-4.14%
DB Gold Double Short ETN

FULT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULT has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FULT jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FULT
1D Price
Change %
FULT100%
+1.69%
FNB - FULT
89%
Closely correlated
+1.64%
ASB - FULT
89%
Closely correlated
+1.47%
UBSI - FULT
89%
Closely correlated
+2.02%
UCB - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
+1.76%
ONB - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
+2.05%
More

ONBPP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONBPP has been loosely correlated with FHN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ONBPP jumps, then FHN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ONBPP
1D Price
Change %
ONBPP100%
+0.00%
FHN - ONBPP
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.61%
WAL - ONBPP
55%
Loosely correlated
+2.30%
RBB - ONBPP
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
FULT - ONBPP
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.69%
BKU - ONBPP
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.90%
More