Advertisement
FULT vs PFS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FULT is a StrongBuy and PFS is a StrongBuy.
FULT in upward trend: price rose above 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026
FULT moved above its 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend. In 33 of 45 similar past instances, the stock price increased further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 73%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where FULT's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 15 of 26 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 58%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 20, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on FULT as a result. In 45 of 77 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 58%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for FULT just turned positive on October 16, 2026. Looking at past instances where FULT's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 33 of 46 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 72%.
Following a +5.06% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FULT advanced for three days, in 180 of 300 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 60%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 2 days. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FULT declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 59%.
FULT broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for FULT entered a downward trend on October 22, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 11 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 20 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 31 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 56, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 44 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.247) is normal, around the industry mean (1.269). P/E Ratio (11.271) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.317). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.270) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). Dividend Yield (0.032) settles around the average of (0.035) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.178) is also within normal values, averaging (3.738).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 45 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. FULT’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
PFS's MACD Histogram crosses above signal line
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for PFS turned positive on October 15, 2026. Looking at past instances where PFS's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 38 of 49 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 78%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where PFS's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 23 of 34 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 68%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 20, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on PFS as a result. In 55 of 83 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 66%.
PFS moved above its 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +3.11% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PFS advanced for three days, in 152 of 286 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 53%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 2 days. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PFS declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 61%.
PFS broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for PFS entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 13 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 34 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.043) is normal, around the industry mean (1.269). P/E Ratio (9.683) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.317). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.190) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). Dividend Yield (0.041) settles around the average of (0.035) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.332) is also within normal values, averaging (3.738).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 46 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. PFS’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 48 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 66 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 56, placing this stock slightly worse than average.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
FULT | PFS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 27 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 44 Fair valued | 34 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 31 | 66 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 11 | 13 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 20 | 48 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PFS's Valuation (34) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (44) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.
FULT's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PFS (66) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than PFS’s over the last 12 months.
FULT's SMR Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (13) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.
FULT's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (46) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.
FULT's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (48) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.
| FULT | PFS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 47% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 53% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 59% | 10 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 65% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FULT’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while PFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FULT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- PFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FULT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FULT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FULT (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.67% price change this week, while PFS (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.54% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.12%.
Reported Earning Dates
FULT is expected to report earnings on Jan 19, 2027.
PFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+2.29% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
Advertisement
PFS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFS has been closely correlated with TRMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFS jumps, then TRMK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PFS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFS | 100% | +0.52% | ||
| TRMK - PFS | 86% Closely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| UBSI - PFS | 86% Closely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| AUB - PFS | 84% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| FULT - PFS | 83% Closely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| CFFN - PFS | 83% Closely correlated | +0.84% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BSSX | 24.66 | 0.23 | +0.94% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF (BSSX) | |||
| GMMA | 21.80 | -0.07 | -0.32% |
| GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF (GMMA) | |||
| QGRW | 65.97 | -0.25 | -0.38% |
| WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) | |||
| AAUS | 61.10 | -0.27 | -0.44% |
| Alpha Architect US Equity ETF (AAUS) | |||
| MEDI | 33.54 | -0.33 | -0.97% |
| Harbor Health Care ETF (MEDI) | |||