FUNC
Price
$44.14
Change
+$0.30 (+0.68%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
284.87M
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HBCP
Price
$71.72
Change
+$0.38 (+0.53%)
Updated
Aug 3, 11:13 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
561.31M
79 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FUNC vs HBCP

FUNC vs HBCP Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUNC vs. HBCP commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUNC is a Hold and HBCP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (FUNC: $44.14 vs. HBCP: $71.34)
Brand notoriety: FUNC and HBCP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUNC: 42% vs. HBCP: 49%
Market capitalization -- FUNC: $284.87M vs. HBCP: $561.31M
FUNC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $284.87M. HBCP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $561.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUNC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHBCP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FUNC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HBCP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FUNC is a better buy in the long-term than HBCP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUNC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HBCP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUNC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • HBCP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HBCP is a better buy in the short-term than FUNC.

Price Growth

FUNC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.96% price change this week, while HBCP (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUNC is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.

HBCP is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBCP($561M) has a higher market cap than FUNC($285M). HBCP has higher P/E ratio than FUNC: HBCP (11.93) vs FUNC (11.29). HBCP YTD gains are higher at: 24.646 vs. FUNC (20.194). FUNC has less debt than HBCP: FUNC (32M) vs HBCP (54.7M). HBCP has higher revenues than FUNC: HBCP (151M) vs FUNC (91.3M).
FUNCHBCPFUNC / HBCP
Capitalization285M561M51%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD20.19424.64682%
P/E Ratio11.2911.9395%
Revenue91.3M151M60%
Total Cash89.2MN/A-
Total Debt32M54.7M59%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUNC vs HBCP: Fundamental Ratings
FUNC
HBCP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5028
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2314
SMR RATING
1..100
5759
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4443
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3132
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3650

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUNC's Valuation (36) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HBCP (54) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to HBCP’s over the last 12 months.

HBCP's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (23) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HBCP’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's SMR Rating (57) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HBCP (59) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to HBCP’s over the last 12 months.

HBCP's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (44) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HBCP’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HBCP (32) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to HBCP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FUNCHBCP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FUNC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HBCP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IEDCX12.860.12
+0.94%
Voya Large Cap Value C
IEIFX11.740.08
+0.69%
Invesco Equity and Income R6
EVTMX17.240.02
+0.12%
Eaton Vance Dividend Builder A
EMAYX20.13N/A
N/A
Gabelli Entpr Mergers & Acquisitions Y
BRSBX15.85-0.08
-0.50%
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Eq B

FUNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUNC has been closely correlated with GSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUNC jumps, then GSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUNC
1D Price
Change %
FUNC100%
+0.68%
GSBC - FUNC
76%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
HBCP - FUNC
75%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
BHRB - FUNC
75%
Closely correlated
+0.31%
FBIZ - FUNC
75%
Closely correlated
+4.39%
PEBO - FUNC
75%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
More