FUNC
Price
$43.62
Change
-$0.24 (-0.55%)
Updated
Oct 2 closing price
Capitalization
282.94M
23 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HBCP
Price
$67.53
Change
+$0.68 (+1.02%)
Updated
Oct 2 closing price
Capitalization
527.81M
18 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FUNC vs HBCP

FUNC vs HBCP Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUNC vs. HBCP commentary
Oct 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUNC is a StrongBuy and HBCP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUNC vs HBCP: Fundamental Ratings
FUNC
HBCP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9459
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2315
SMR RATING
1..100
4535
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4347
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2933
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUNC's Valuation (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HBCP (51) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to HBCP’s over the last 12 months.

HBCP's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (23) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HBCP’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

HBCP's SMR Rating (35) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (45) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HBCP’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HBCP (47) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to HBCP’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HBCP (33) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to HBCP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FUNCHBCP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 03, 2026
Stock price -- (FUNC: $43.62 vs. HBCP: $67.53)
Brand notoriety: FUNC and HBCP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUNC: 97% vs. HBCP: 62%
Market capitalization -- FUNC: $282.94M vs. HBCP: $527.81M
FUNC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $282.94M. HBCP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $527.81M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $22.65 to $173.74B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUNC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while HBCP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FUNC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HBCP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FUNC is a better buy in the long-term than HBCP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUNC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HBCP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUNC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • HBCP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HBCP is a better buy in the short-term than FUNC.

Price Growth

FUNC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.76% price change this week, while HBCP (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUNC is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.

HBCP is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.70% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

View a ticker or compare two or three
FUNC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HBCP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BHV11.580.37
+3.30%
BlackRock Virginia Muni
FDD18.840.04
+0.21%
First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Income Fund
MPRO31.450.06
+0.18%
Monarch ProCap Index ETF (MPRO)
VGSH57.46-0.03
-0.04%
Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH)
AAA24.92-0.04
-0.15%
Alternative Access First Priority CLO Bond ETF (AAA)

FUNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUNC has been closely correlated with GSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUNC jumps, then GSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUNC
1D Price
Change %
FUNC100%
-0.55%
GSBC - FUNC
72%
Closely correlated
+1.49%
HBCP - FUNC
72%
Closely correlated
+1.02%
HBNC - FUNC
72%
Closely correlated
+2.96%
FBIZ - FUNC
71%
Closely correlated
+2.07%
NBHC - FUNC
70%
Closely correlated
-2.83%
More