FUNC
Price
$42.94
Change
+$0.69 (+1.63%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:03 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
272.37M
34 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HBCP
Price
$67.46
Change
+$1.15 (+1.73%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:13 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
520.67M
35 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FUNC vs HBCP

FUNC vs HBCP Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUNC vs. HBCP commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUNC is a Buy and HBCP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (FUNC: $42.25 vs. HBCP: $66.39)
Brand notoriety: FUNC and HBCP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUNC: 75% vs. HBCP: 95%
Market capitalization -- FUNC: $272.37M vs. HBCP: $520.67M
FUNC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $272.37M. HBCP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $520.67M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUNC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHBCP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FUNC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HBCP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FUNC and HBCP are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUNC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HBCP’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUNC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HBCP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FUNC is a better buy in the short-term than HBCP.

Price Growth

FUNC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.91% price change this week, while HBCP (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUNC is expected to report earnings on Jul 27, 2026.

HBCP is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.31% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBCP($521M) has a higher market cap than FUNC($272M). HBCP (11.16) and FUNC (10.81) have similar P/E ratio . HBCP YTD gains are higher at: 15.998 vs. FUNC (14.387). FUNC has less debt than HBCP: FUNC (32M) vs HBCP (54.7M). HBCP has higher revenues than FUNC: HBCP (151M) vs FUNC (91.3M).
FUNCHBCPFUNC / HBCP
Capitalization272M521M52%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD14.38715.99890%
P/E Ratio10.8111.1697%
Revenue91.3M151M60%
Total Cash130MN/A-
Total Debt32M54.7M59%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUNC vs HBCP: Fundamental Ratings
FUNC
HBCP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4337
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2821
SMR RATING
1..100
5758
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4346
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2846
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5049

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUNC's Valuation (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HBCP (49) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to HBCP’s over the last 12 months.

HBCP's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (28) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HBCP’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's SMR Rating (57) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HBCP (58) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to HBCP’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HBCP (46) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to HBCP’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HBCP (46) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to HBCP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FUNCHBCP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FUNC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HBCP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBRAX29.700.07
+0.24%
Neuberger M/C Intrinsic Val A
OMGCX23.56N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth C
WASMX25.05N/A
N/A
Boston Trust Walden SMID Cap
PMIRX11.71N/A
N/A
Putnam Multi-Asset Income R
KTCSX58.04N/A
N/A
DWS Science and Technology S

FUNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUNC has been closely correlated with CWBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUNC jumps, then CWBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUNC
1D Price
Change %
FUNC100%
-0.78%
CWBC - FUNC
74%
Closely correlated
+0.48%
BHRB - FUNC
73%
Closely correlated
-0.06%
HBCP - FUNC
73%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
FBIZ - FUNC
72%
Closely correlated
+0.10%
PEBO - FUNC
72%
Closely correlated
+1.02%
More