Advertisement
FUNC vs NBHC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUNC is a StrongBuy and NBHC is a Hold.
FUNC's MACD Histogram just turned positive
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for FUNC turned positive on October 21, 2026. Looking at past instances where FUNC's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 27 of 39 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 21, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on FUNC as a result. In 51 of 83 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 61%.
FUNC moved above its 50-day moving average on October 21, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for FUNC crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 8 of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 50%.
Following a +4.20% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FUNC advanced for three days, in 204 of 319 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 151 of 247 cases where FUNC Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 61%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 1 day. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FUNC declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 55%.
FUNC broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 19 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 56, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 22 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 41 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. FUNC’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 44 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.399) is normal, around the industry mean (1.272). P/E Ratio (11.894) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.289). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.130) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). Dividend Yield (0.024) settles around the average of (0.035) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.030) is also within normal values, averaging (3.738).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 45 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly weaker than average sales and a marginally profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 95 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
NBHC's MACD Histogram crosses above signal line
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for NBHC turned positive on October 16, 2026. Looking at past instances where NBHC's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 33 of 47 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 70%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where NBHC's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 16 of 27 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 59%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 21, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on NBHC as a result. In 51 of 84 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 61%.
Following a +2.13% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where NBHC advanced for three days, in 170 of 303 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 56%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 2 days. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
The 50-day moving average for NBHC moved below the 200-day moving average on October 13, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where NBHC declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 56%.
NBHC broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for NBHC entered a downward trend on October 23, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 13 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 20 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 47 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.042) is normal, around the industry mean (1.272). P/E Ratio (16.408) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.289). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.250) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). Dividend Yield (0.033) settles around the average of (0.035) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.709) is also within normal values, averaging (3.738).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 58 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. NBHC’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 82 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. NBHC’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 56, placing this stock worse than average.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
FUNC | NBHC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 44 Fair valued | 47 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 82 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | 20 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 22 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FUNC's Valuation (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NBHC (47). This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to NBHC’s over the last 12 months.
FUNC's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NBHC (82). This means that FUNC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NBHC’s over the last 12 months.
NBHC's SMR Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (45). This means that NBHC’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.
FUNC's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NBHC (58). This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to NBHC’s over the last 12 months.
NBHC's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (22). This means that NBHC’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.
| FUNC | NBHC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 64% | 12 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 55% | 14 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 59% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FUNC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while NBHC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FUNC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- NBHC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FUNC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NBHC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FUNC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- NBHC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FUNC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.68% price change this week, while NBHC (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.13% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.48%.
Reported Earning Dates
FUNC is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2027.
NBHC is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+1.32% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
Advertisement
FUNC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUNC has been closely correlated with GSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUNC jumps, then GSBC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FUNC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FUNC | 100% | -0.57% | ||
| GSBC - FUNC | 72% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| NBHC - FUNC | 70% Closely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| BFST - FUNC | 70% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| HTB - FUNC | 70% Closely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| BHB - FUNC | 69% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
More | ||||
NBHC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NBHC has been closely correlated with FFBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NBHC jumps, then FFBC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NBHC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NBHC | 100% | +0.44% | ||
| FFBC - NBHC | 83% Closely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| UBSI - NBHC | 81% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| PEBO - NBHC | 81% Closely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| CATY - NBHC | 81% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| EFSC - NBHC | 81% Closely correlated | +1.52% | ||
More | ||||