FUTU
Price
$179.14
Change
+$2.68 (+1.52%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
24.94B
55 days until earnings call
GSIW
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
33.81M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FUTU vs GSIW

Header iconFUTU vs GSIW Comparison
Open Charts FUTU vs GSIWBanner chart's image
Futu Holdings
Price$179.14
Change+$2.68 (+1.52%)
Volume$3.64M
Capitalization24.94B
Garden Stage
Price$0.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.61M
Capitalization33.81M
FUTU vs GSIW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FUTU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSIW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUTU vs. GSIW commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUTU is a Buy and GSIW is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FUTU: $179.14 vs. GSIW: $0.16)
Brand notoriety: FUTU and GSIW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUTU: 143% vs. GSIW: 21%
Market capitalization -- FUTU: $24.94B vs. GSIW: $33.81M
FUTU [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $24.94B. GSIW’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $33.81M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUTU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGSIW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FUTU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GSIW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FUTU is a better buy in the long-term than GSIW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUTU’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSIW’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUTU’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GSIW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FUTU is a better buy in the short-term than GSIW.

Price Growth

FUTU (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +3.00% price change this week, while GSIW (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +5.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +66.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUTU is expected to report earnings on Nov 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.48% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUTU($24.9B) has a higher market cap than GSIW($33.8M). FUTU YTD gains are higher at: 123.953 vs. GSIW (-76.727).
FUTUGSIWFUTU / GSIW
Capitalization24.9B33.8M73,669%
EBITDA9.98BN/A-
Gain YTD123.953-76.727-162%
P/E Ratio24.73N/A-
Revenue17.9BN/A-
Total Cash9.38BN/A-
Total Debt9.79BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUTU vs GSIW: Fundamental Ratings
FUTU
GSIW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6921
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
48100
SMR RATING
1..100
36100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3865
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
23100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
44n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GSIW's Valuation (72) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry is in the same range as FUTU (80) in the null industry. This means that GSIW’s stock grew similarly to FUTU’s over the last 12 months.

FUTU's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSIW (100) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that FUTU’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSIW’s over the last 12 months.

FUTU's SMR Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSIW (100) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that FUTU’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSIW’s over the last 12 months.

FUTU's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as GSIW (65) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that FUTU’s stock grew similarly to GSIW’s over the last 12 months.

FUTU's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GSIW (100) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that FUTU’s stock grew significantly faster than GSIW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FUTUGSIW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FUTU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSIW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BIS14.060.48
+3.50%
ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotech
IBMR25.54-0.08
-0.31%
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bd ETF
PFFA21.88-0.08
-0.36%
Virtus InfraCap US Preferred Stock ETF
BKEM72.75-0.40
-0.55%
BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF
XJH43.33-0.29
-0.66%
iShares ESG Select Scrn S&P Mid-Cap ETF

GSIW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GSIW and FUTU have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GSIW and FUTU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSIW
1D Price
Change %
GSIW100%
-4.97%
FUTU - GSIW
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.52%
LPLA - GSIW
17%
Poorly correlated
+1.00%
CLSK - GSIW
15%
Poorly correlated
-5.33%
MARA - GSIW
9%
Poorly correlated
-8.90%
GS - GSIW
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
More