FUTU
Price
$187.28
Change
-$1.84 (-0.97%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
26.33B
75 days until earnings call
LAZ
Price
$56.42
Change
-$0.40 (-0.70%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
5.32B
47 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FUTU vs LAZ

Header iconFUTU vs LAZ Comparison
Open Charts FUTU vs LAZBanner chart's image
Futu Holdings
Price$187.28
Change-$1.84 (-0.97%)
Volume$1.9M
Capitalization26.33B
Lazard
Price$56.42
Change-$0.40 (-0.70%)
Volume$770.69K
Capitalization5.32B
FUTU vs LAZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FUTU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LAZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUTU vs. LAZ commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUTU is a Hold and LAZ is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FUTU: $187.28 vs. LAZ: $56.42)
Brand notoriety: FUTU and LAZ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUTU: 74% vs. LAZ: 83%
Market capitalization -- FUTU: $26.33B vs. LAZ: $5.32B
FUTU [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $26.33B. LAZ’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $5.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUTU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLAZ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FUTU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LAZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FUTU and LAZ are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUTU’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LAZ’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUTU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LAZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FUTU and LAZ are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FUTU (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +0.91% price change this week, while LAZ (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -1.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUTU is expected to report earnings on Nov 20, 2025.

LAZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.77% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUTU($26.3B) has a higher market cap than LAZ($5.32B). FUTU has higher P/E ratio than LAZ: FUTU (26.22) vs LAZ (19.32). FUTU YTD gains are higher at: 134.129 vs. LAZ (13.115). FUTU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.11B vs. LAZ (538M). FUTU has more cash in the bank: 9.63B vs. LAZ (1.22B). LAZ has less debt than FUTU: LAZ (2.21B) vs FUTU (11.2B). FUTU has higher revenues than LAZ: FUTU (15.7B) vs LAZ (3.08B).
FUTULAZFUTU / LAZ
Capitalization26.3B5.32B494%
EBITDA8.11B538M1,508%
Gain YTD134.12913.1151,023%
P/E Ratio26.2219.32136%
Revenue15.7B3.08B509%
Total Cash9.63B1.22B793%
Total Debt11.2B2.21B507%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUTU vs LAZ: Fundamental Ratings
FUTU
LAZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1771
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4738
SMR RATING
1..100
3919
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3543
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1289
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LAZ's Valuation (21) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUTU (80) in the null industry. This means that LAZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUTU’s over the last 12 months.

LAZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as FUTU (47) in the null industry. This means that LAZ’s stock grew similarly to FUTU’s over the last 12 months.

LAZ's SMR Rating (19) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as FUTU (39) in the null industry. This means that LAZ’s stock grew similarly to FUTU’s over the last 12 months.

FUTU's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as LAZ (43) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that FUTU’s stock grew similarly to LAZ’s over the last 12 months.

FUTU's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LAZ (89) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that FUTU’s stock grew significantly faster than LAZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FUTULAZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FUTU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LAZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PIEJX30.66N/A
N/A
Principal Glb Emerging Markets J
SGIIX80.93N/A
N/A
First Eagle Global I
PAGLX46.50N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Global Growth Stock Adv
VMNFX14.09N/A
N/A
Vanguard Market Neutral Inv
RKCAX10.99N/A
N/A
Rockefeller Climate Solutions A

LAZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAZ has been closely correlated with MC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LAZ jumps, then MC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LAZ
1D Price
Change %
LAZ100%
-0.70%
MC - LAZ
85%
Closely correlated
-1.46%
SF - LAZ
84%
Closely correlated
-2.71%
PIPR - LAZ
83%
Closely correlated
-1.24%
GS - LAZ
82%
Closely correlated
-1.43%
JEF - LAZ
82%
Closely correlated
-2.26%
More