FVD
Price
$50.70
Change
+$0.03 (+0.06%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
8.29B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SCHD
Price
$35.11
Change
+$0.28 (+0.80%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
112B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FVD vs SCHD

FVD vs SCHD Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) vs. Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD)

Key Takeaways

  • First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) employs a safety-ranked, monthly-rebalanced approach targeting above-average dividend yields across roughly 250 holdings with a mid-cap value tilt, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) follows a quality-screened Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index with about 100 large-cap holdings.
  • FVD carries a higher expense ratio of 0.62% compared with SCHD’s low 0.06% expense ratio, reflecting differences in index complexity and turnover.
  • Sector exposures diverge meaningfully: FVD allocates heavily to financials and utilities, whereas SCHD emphasizes healthcare and consumer defensive sectors.
  • FVD offers broader diversification through more holdings and an equal-weighting bias within its safety criteria, while SCHD provides concentrated exposure to high-quality dividend payers with stricter fundamental screens.
  • Both ETFs pursue U.S. dividend strategies but serve distinct investor preferences—FVD for safety-focused mid-cap exposure and SCHD for cost-efficient large-cap dividend quality.
  • Liquidity profiles favor SCHD due to significantly higher average daily trading volume, though both maintain adequate market depth for most investors.

Introduction

Dividend-focused exchange-traded funds remain popular among income-oriented investors seeking exposure to U.S. equities with consistent payouts. First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) both target dividend-paying companies yet employ fundamentally different index methodologies and portfolio construction rules. They do not compete directly; instead, they represent alternative strategies within the broad dividend equity category, allowing investors to choose between a safety-ranked, higher-turnover approach with mid-cap emphasis and a low-cost, quality-screened large-cap strategy.

First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) Overview

First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) seeks to track the Value Line Dividend Index. The index selects securities ranked #1 or #2 by the Value Line Safety Ranking System that also offer above-average dividend yields. The fund holds approximately 250 securities and applies monthly rebalancing and reconstitution. Top holdings typically represent less than 0.5% each, reflecting an equal-weighting influence within the safety criteria. Sector allocations feature notable exposure to financials (around 20%), utilities (17–18%), and industrials, with smaller weights in technology and communication services. The expense ratio stands at 0.62%. The strategy is fully passive and rules-based, emphasizing dividend sustainability through proprietary safety metrics rather than pure market-cap weighting.

Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) Overview

Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, which selects 100 high-dividend-yielding U.S. companies based on consistent dividend history and fundamental strength metrics such as return on equity and free cash flow to debt. The fund maintains roughly 100 holdings with top positions often exceeding 4% each. Sector weights concentrate in healthcare (around 20%), consumer defensive (19–20%), and energy (around 14%), with meaningful technology exposure. SCHD applies quarterly index rebalancing. Its expense ratio is 0.06%, among the lowest in the dividend ETF category. The structure is passive and rules-based, prioritizing dividend quality and sustainability within a large-cap universe.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the U.S. dividend equity space, influenced by macroeconomic factors including interest rate expectations, corporate earnings stability, and capital allocation priorities. Defensive sectors such as healthcare, consumer staples, utilities, and financials have attracted flows during periods of economic uncertainty. Regulatory developments around corporate taxation and dividend policies, along with broader equity market rotation between growth and value styles, shape the environment. Energy exposure in SCHD introduces sensitivity to commodity price cycles, while FVD’s utility and financial weights respond to interest rate movements and credit conditions. These thematic drivers affect relative performance across market cycles without relying on short-term price fluctuations.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, SCHD has demonstrated resilience through its focus on high-quality large-cap dividend payers with strong balance sheets, often performing steadily during defensive rotations. First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) has provided differentiated exposure via its mid-cap and safety-ranked holdings, which can exhibit varying sensitivity to economic expansions and contractions. SCHD’s lower expense ratio and concentrated quality screen contribute to tighter tracking of its benchmark, while FVD’s broader holdings and monthly rebalancing introduce modestly higher turnover. Relative positioning favors SCHD for cost-conscious investors prioritizing large-cap stability and FVD for those seeking broader safety-focused diversification across market capitalizations.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors comparing dividend strategies like those in First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) may find the tool useful for refining ideas aligned with their objectives.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic edge to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Its substantially lower expense ratio, concentrated exposure to high-quality large-cap dividend payers, and strong sector momentum in defensive areas support more consistent positioning across market environments. First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) offers valuable diversification through its safety-ranked and broader holdings, yet higher costs and mid-cap tilt introduce different risk characteristics that may suit narrower investor mandates.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FVD vs. SCHD commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FVD is a StrongBuy and SCHD is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHD has more net assets: 112B vs. FVD (8.3B). SCHD has a higher annual dividend yield than FVD: SCHD (30.107) vs FVD (11.303). FVD was incepted earlier than SCHD: FVD (23 years) vs SCHD (15 years). SCHD (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than FVD (0.62). FVD has a higher turnover SCHD (30.00) vs SCHD (30.00).
FVDSCHDFVD / SCHD
Gain YTD11.30330.10738%
Net Assets8.3B112B7%
Total Expense Ratio0.620.061,033%
Turnover65.0030.00217%
Yield2.233.1371%
Fund Existence23 years15 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FVDSCHD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FVD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SCHD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CVY30.480.23
+0.77%
Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF
PTY11.750.09
+0.77%
PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund
MHY25.910.03
+0.12%
Man Active High Yield ETF
REAI21.65-0.05
-0.24%
Intelligent Real Estate ETF
QVMM35.80-0.14
-0.38%
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Mlt-fctr ETF

FVD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FVD has been closely correlated with OGE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FVD jumps, then OGE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FVD
1D Price
Change %
FVD100%
+0.06%
OGE - FVD
71%
Closely correlated
-2.38%
CUBE - FVD
71%
Closely correlated
-0.70%
FRT - FVD
69%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
PLD - FVD
69%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
PSA - FVD
68%
Closely correlated
-0.08%
More