Advertisement
GEO vs GHC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GEO is a Hold and GHC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GEO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGHC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- GEO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- GHC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GEO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GHC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GEO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
- GHC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
GEO (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +0.10% price change this week, while GHC (@Industrial Conglomerates) price change was -2.09% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +4.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +115.41%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was +4.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.78%.
Reported Earning Dates
GEO is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
GHC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+4.50% weekly)The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.
@Industrial Conglomerates (+4.61% weekly)Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).
| GEO | GHC | GEO / GHC | |
| Capitalization | 4B | 4.97B | 80% |
| EBITDA | 658M | 932M | 71% |
| Gain YTD | 95.099 | 8.611 | 1,104% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.33 | 9.49 | 151% |
| Revenue | 2.73B | 5.07B | 54% |
| Total Cash | 80.2M | 1.25B | 6% |
| Total Debt | 1.66B | 1.34B | 124% |
GEO | GHC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 62 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 9 Undervalued | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 17 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 56 | 65 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 19 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GEO's Valuation (9) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as GHC (18) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that GEO’s stock grew similarly to GHC’s over the last 12 months.
GHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as GEO (45) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew similarly to GEO’s over the last 12 months.
GEO's SMR Rating (56) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as GHC (65) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that GEO’s stock grew similarly to GHC’s over the last 12 months.
GEO's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as GHC (49) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that GEO’s stock grew similarly to GHC’s over the last 12 months.
GHC's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for GEO (96) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew significantly faster than GEO’s over the last 12 months.
| GEO | GHC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 54% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 44% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 83% | 16 days ago 55% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 45% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 50% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ADPV | 45.91 | 0.79 | +1.75% |
| Adaptiv™ Select ETF | |||
| NBET | 41.11 | 0.19 | +0.46% |
| Neuberger Energy Trnstn & Infras ETF | |||
| TUA | 20.41 | 0.08 | +0.39% |
| Simplify Short Term Trsy Futs Strat ETF | |||
| FDL | 52.11 | -0.04 | -0.08% |
| First Trust Morningstar Div Leaders ETF | |||
| DAT | 49.12 | -0.44 | -0.88% |
| ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF | |||
GEO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GEO has been closely correlated with CXW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GEO jumps, then CXW could also see price increases.
GHC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GHC has been loosely correlated with MSA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GHC jumps, then MSA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GHC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHC | 100% | +1.15% | ||
| MSA - GHC | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| CASS - GHC | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| AZZ - GHC | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.14% | ||
| BRC - GHC | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| EXPO - GHC | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.04% | ||
More | ||||