It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GFF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileOC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GFF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
GFF (@Building Products) experienced а +6.80% price change this week, while OC (@Building Products) price change was +3.61% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was +2.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.85%.
GFF is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.
OC is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.
The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.
GFF | OC | GFF / OC | |
Capitalization | 3.79B | 13B | 29% |
EBITDA | 275M | 1.96B | 14% |
Gain YTD | 14.983 | -7.385 | -203% |
P/E Ratio | 56.10 | 19.04 | 295% |
Revenue | 2.52B | 11.7B | 22% |
Total Cash | 46.1M | 230M | 20% |
Total Debt | 1.71B | 5.98B | 29% |
GFF | OC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 94 Overvalued | 48 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 40 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 20 | 81 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 18 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 23 | 4 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OC's Valuation (48) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFF (94) in the Building Products industry. This means that OC’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFF’s over the last 12 months.
GFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as OC (40) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew similarly to OC’s over the last 12 months.
GFF's SMR Rating (20) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OC (81) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OC’s over the last 12 months.
GFF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as OC (50) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew similarly to OC’s over the last 12 months.
GFF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as OC (18) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew similarly to OC’s over the last 12 months.
GFF | OC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago88% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | 1 day ago75% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago71% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 1 day ago59% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 1 day ago73% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | 1 day ago72% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago69% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago60% | 4 days ago56% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 1 day ago65% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago79% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
NUW | 13.94 | 0.20 | +1.46% |
Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Value Fund | |||
FTA | 83.14 | 0.04 | +0.05% |
First Trust Large Cap Val AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
RNWZ | 24.37 | N/A | N/A |
TrueShares Eagle Glbl Rnwbls Engy IncETF | |||
DYTA | 28.61 | N/A | -0.01% |
SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF | |||
IONX | 58.14 | -0.80 | -1.36% |
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long IONQ ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFF has been loosely correlated with MAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFF jumps, then MAS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GFF | 100% | +2.08% | ||
MAS - GFF | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.83% | ||
TREX - GFF | 61% Loosely correlated | +3.76% | ||
OC - GFF | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.12% | ||
ROCK - GFF | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.53% | ||
FBIN - GFF | 58% Loosely correlated | +3.00% | ||
More |