GFS
Price
$63.94
Change
-$5.03 (-7.29%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
35.08B
22 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LRCX
Price
$329.92
Change
-$20.41 (-5.83%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
412.59B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GFS vs LRCX

GFS vs LRCX Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GFS vs. LRCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFS is a Buy and LRCX is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (GFS: $63.94 vs. LRCX: $329.92)
Brand notoriety: GFS: Not notable vs. LRCX: Notable
GFS represents the Semiconductors, while LRCX is part of the Electronic Production Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GFS: 32% vs. LRCX: 50%
Market capitalization -- GFS: $35.08B vs. LRCX: $412.59B
GFS [@Semiconductors] is valued at $35.08B. LRCX’s [@Electronic Production Equipment] market capitalization is $412.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $4.93T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $688.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $199.83B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry is $69.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GFS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLRCX’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • GFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LRCX’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, LRCX is a better buy in the long-term than GFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GFS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LRCX’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LRCX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both GFS and LRCX are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

GFS (@Semiconductors) experienced а -7.21% price change this week, while LRCX (@Electronic Production Equipment) price change was -5.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -5.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +53.17%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -6.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -16.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +59.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

GFS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

LRCX is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (-5.82% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

@Electronic Production Equipment (-6.02% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LRCX($413B) has a higher market cap than GFS($35.1B). LRCX has higher P/E ratio than GFS: LRCX (62.37) vs GFS (46.00). LRCX YTD gains are higher at: 93.100 vs. GFS (83.368). LRCX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.07B vs. GFS (2.4B). GFS has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. LRCX (1.68B). GFS has less debt than LRCX: GFS (1.72B) vs LRCX (3.73B). LRCX has higher revenues than GFS: LRCX (21.7B) vs GFS (6.77B).
GFSLRCXGFS / LRCX
Capitalization35.1B413B8%
EBITDA2.4B8.07B30%
Gain YTD83.36893.10090%
P/E Ratio46.0062.3774%
Revenue6.77B21.7B31%
Total Cash1.81B1.68B108%
Total Debt1.72B3.73B46%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LRCX: Fundamental Ratings
LRCX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
79
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
14
SMR RATING
1..100
17
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GFSLRCX
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LRCX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ISCWX107.59N/A
N/A
Voya Multi-Manager International Sm Cp W
MPGFX196.73N/A
N/A
Mairs & Power Fund
AGFIX136.27N/A
N/A
AB Growth I
BWNYX32.39N/A
N/A
Bullfinch Greater Western New York
WFEHX17.16N/A
N/A
Allspring International Equity R6

GFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFS has been closely correlated with KLIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GFS jumps, then KLIC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFS
1D Price
Change %
GFS100%
-7.29%
KLIC - GFS
72%
Closely correlated
-6.10%
FORM - GFS
69%
Closely correlated
-6.14%
ENTG - GFS
67%
Closely correlated
-6.25%
LRCX - GFS
66%
Loosely correlated
-5.83%
DIOD - GFS
65%
Loosely correlated
-4.24%
More