AMAT
Price
$500.87
Change
+$10.82 (+2.21%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
389.08B
71 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UMC
Price
$21.40
Change
-$1.06 (-4.72%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
56.46B
56 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMAT vs UMC

Header iconAMAT vs UMC Comparison
Open Charts AMAT vs UMCBanner chart's image
AMAT vs UMC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Applied Materials (AMAT) vs. United Microelectronics (UMC) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • AMAT has delivered stronger year-to-date gains of approximately 62%, outpacing UMC's 54% rise, amid robust semiconductor demand.
  • AMAT, a leading semiconductor equipment provider, boasts a market cap over $331 billion, dwarfing UMC's $31 billion.
  • Both stocks have surged in recent market activity, with AMAT up nearly 180% over the past year and UMC gaining about 77%.
  • AI-driven demand bolsters AMAT's growth, while UMC benefits from mature-node strength and partnerships.
  • AMAT trades at a higher P/E ratio (price-to-earnings) of 42.7 versus UMC's 23.2, reflecting premium valuation for its scale.

Introduction

In the surging semiconductor sector, fueled by artificial intelligence and computing demands, AMAT and UMC represent distinct plays for investors. Applied Materials dominates equipment manufacturing essential for chip production, while United Microelectronics focuses on wafer foundry services, particularly in mature and specialty nodes. This stock comparison analyzes their recent performance, business models, and market positioning. Traders eyeing sector momentum and long-term investors seeking relative value will find insights into how these stocks stack up amid volatile chip cycles and geopolitical influences.

AMAT Overview and Recent Performance

Applied Materials (AMAT) is a global leader in materials engineering solutions for semiconductors, providing equipment for deposition, etching, and inspection used by chipmakers worldwide. In recent market activity, AMAT shares have shown robust momentum, closing around $417 with a 52-week range of $145 to $421 and year-to-date gains exceeding 62%. The stock has climbed nearly 180% over the past year, driven by AI computing demand and strong Q1 2026 results in February, where revenue hit $7.01 billion—beating estimates—and EPS reached $2.38. Sentiment remains positive amid sector tailwinds, though elevated valuations and supply chain risks temper gains in recent weeks.

UMC Overview and Recent Performance

United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC) operates as a pure-play semiconductor foundry, fabricating wafers for clients in communications, IoT, automotive, and computing. Recently, UMC shares traded near $12.28, with a 52-week range of $6.56 to $12.82 and YTD returns around 54%. The stock surged over 9% in recent weeks ahead of March sales data and dividends, reflecting improved utilization and full-year 2025 shipment growth of 12.3%. Partnerships in photonics and hybrid bonding have boosted outlook, with Q1 2026 results pending; steady demand for mature nodes supports resilience despite Taiwan exposure.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page features the top 25 AI trading bots from over 350 available, each scanning thousands of tickers with diverse strategies like trend-following and mean reversion across timeframes from 5 minutes to months. Standouts include semiconductor-focused bots with annualized returns up to 103%, win rates of 58-73%, profit factors exceeding 3.0, and profit-to-drawdown ratios over 8—such as one trading AMAT alongside LRCX and ASML. These curated performers adapt to current volatility, offering copy-trading options for varied risk appetites. Explore the page to identify bots aligning with your market view.

Head-to-Head Comparison

AMAT and UMC both thrive in semiconductors but differ in models: AMAT supplies capital equipment with high margins (27.8% profit margin), while UMC offers foundry services emphasizing cost efficiency (17.6% margin). Growth drivers favor AMAT's AI exposure versus UMC's mature-node stability. Recent momentum is strong for both, but AMAT's larger scale yields superior returns. Risks include cyclical downturns for AMAT and geopolitical tensions for Taiwan-based UMC. Market sentiment tilts toward AMAT on valuation premiums, though UMC offers relative value.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron's AI models currently lean toward AMAT, citing consistent upward trends, superior relative performance, and inclusion in high-performing trending bots amid AI catalysts. UMC shows promise in steady demand but trails in momentum and scale. Probabilistic edge favors AMAT for near-term positioning, subject to sector dynamics.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
AMAT vs. UMC commentary
Jun 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMAT is a StrongBuy and UMC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 04, 2026
Stock price -- (AMAT: $490.05 vs. UMC: $22.46)
Brand notoriety: AMAT: Notable vs. UMC: Not notable
AMAT represents the Electronic Production Equipment, while UMC is part of the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMAT: 142% vs. UMC: 105%
Market capitalization -- AMAT: $389.08B vs. UMC: $56.46B
AMAT [@Electronic Production Equipment] is valued at $389.08B. UMC’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $56.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $655.41B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $5.43T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry is $64.97B. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $205.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMAT’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileUMC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AMAT’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • UMC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, UMC is a better buy in the long-term than AMAT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMAT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UMC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UMC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMAT is a better buy in the short-term than UMC.

Price Growth

AMAT (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а +7.73% price change this week, while UMC (@Semiconductors) price change was +6.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -1.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +132.32%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +4.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +36.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +103.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMAT is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2026.

UMC is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Production Equipment (-1.18% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

@Semiconductors (+4.13% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMAT($389B) has a higher market cap than UMC($56.5B). AMAT has higher P/E ratio than UMC: AMAT (47.11) vs UMC (35.85). UMC YTD gains are higher at: 185.751 vs. AMAT (91.164). UMC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 118B vs. AMAT (10.2B). UMC has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. AMAT (1.54B). AMAT has less debt than UMC: AMAT (7.19B) vs UMC (56.7B). UMC has higher revenues than AMAT: UMC (241B) vs AMAT (28.2B).
AMATUMCAMAT / UMC
Capitalization389B56.5B688%
EBITDA10.2B118B9%
Gain YTD91.164185.75149%
P/E Ratio47.1135.85131%
Revenue28.2B241B12%
Total Cash1.54B134B1%
Total Debt7.19B56.7B13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMAT vs UMC: Fundamental Ratings
AMAT
UMC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3838
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
119
SMR RATING
1..100
2465
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
634
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
86
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5047

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UMC's Valuation (37) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMAT (72) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that UMC’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMAT’s over the last 12 months.

UMC's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as AMAT (11) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that UMC’s stock grew similarly to AMAT’s over the last 12 months.

AMAT's SMR Rating (24) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UMC (65) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that AMAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than UMC’s over the last 12 months.

AMAT's Price Growth Rating (6) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as UMC (34) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that AMAT’s stock grew similarly to UMC’s over the last 12 months.

UMC's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as AMAT (8) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that UMC’s stock grew similarly to AMAT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMATUMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UMC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TOPP2.090.15
+7.73%
Toppoint Holdings Inc
INGM31.642.08
+7.04%
Ingram Micro Holding Corp
BLUW10.27N/A
N/A
Blue Water Acquisition Corp III
GOOGL361.85-14.52
-3.86%
Alphabet
CAPR27.33-1.19
-4.19%
Capricor Therapeutics

UMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMC has been loosely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UMC jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UMC
1D Price
Change %
UMC100%
-1.88%
LRCX - UMC
58%
Loosely correlated
+5.45%
KLAC - UMC
57%
Loosely correlated
+5.42%
AMAT - UMC
55%
Loosely correlated
+6.96%
ACLS - UMC
51%
Loosely correlated
+5.62%
KLIC - UMC
51%
Loosely correlated
+4.89%
More