GGG
Price
$80.00
Change
+$0.62 (+0.78%)
Updated
Aug 3, 04:12 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.86B
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MWA
Price
$25.77
Change
+$0.53 (+2.10%)
Updated
Aug 3, 04:16 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.95B
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GGG vs MWA

GGG vs MWA Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Graco Inc. (GGG) vs. Mueller Water Products Inc. (MWA) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Graco Inc. (GGG) is a $12.9 billion industrial fluid-handling specialist with a globally diversified revenue base, while Mueller Water Products (MWA) is a $3.9 billion pure-play water infrastructure company focused almost entirely on North America.
  • Graco's Q2 2026 earnings beat on profitability — adjusted EPS of $0.91 surpassed consensus by $0.10 — and accelerating organic order rates signal strengthening demand momentum heading into the second half of the year.
  • Mueller Water Products delivered record results throughout its fiscal 2025, with full-year net sales rising 8.7% and adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) climbing 14.6%, underpinned by robust municipal infrastructure spending.
  • Both stocks carry a consensus "Hold" rating from Wall Street analysts, yet their risk profiles diverge: Graco faces construction-cycle sensitivity, while Mueller contends with tariff exposure and narrower geographic diversification.
  • On a valuation basis, MWA trades at a discount to GGG on a price-to-earnings basis, though Graco commands a premium justified by superior net margins and a longer track record of dividend growth.

Introduction

Investors scanning the industrial landscape often encounter two companies that, while operating in adjacent manufacturing spheres, serve markedly different end markets. Graco Inc. (GGG), a century-old Minnesota-based manufacturer of fluid-handling equipment, and Mueller Water Products Inc. (MWA), an Atlanta-headquartered provider of water transmission and distribution solutions, each occupy leadership positions in their respective niches. This stock comparison examines how these two industrial manufacturers stack up against each other across performance, valuation, growth drivers, and risk factors. The analysis is particularly relevant for investors seeking exposure to infrastructure and industrial end markets but weighing the trade-offs between a diversified global franchise and a focused North American water infrastructure play.

GGG Overview and Recent Performance

Graco Inc. (GGG) designs, manufactures, and markets systems for moving, measuring, controlling, dispensing, and spraying fluids and powders. Its operations span three segments: Contractor (paint sprayers, protective coating equipment), Industrial (liquid finishing, lubrication systems), and Expansion Markets (semiconductor pumps, environmental monitoring). With roughly 40% of revenue generated outside the Americas, Graco maintains a genuinely global footprint.

In recent weeks, Graco delivered its Q2 2026 earnings report, posting record quarterly sales of $590.6 million — a 3% year-over-year increase — and adjusted earnings per share of $0.91, which exceeded Wall Street consensus by approximately 12%. The profit beat was underpinned by a 130-basis-point gross margin expansion and disciplined cost management. More notably, organic incoming orders increased at a mid-single-digit pace during the quarter, and the six-week booking average through mid-July surged 14%. Backlog excluding acquisitions jumped 28% from the start of 2026. These forward-looking indicators helped offset investor concerns about a modest revenue miss and reinforced management's guidance for low-single-digit organic sales growth for the full year. The company also announced the pending acquisition of Valco Melton for $447 million, a deal expected to broaden its industrial dispensing capabilities.

Despite the positive earnings catalyst, GGG shares remain approximately 16% below their 52-week high of $95.69, set in February 2026. Wolfe Research downgraded the stock to "Peer Perform" in early July, citing a potentially prolonged recovery timeline in the construction-exposed Contractor segment, while RBC Capital Markets raised its price target to $96, maintaining an "Outperform" rating. The stock currently trades near $80 with a trailing P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio of approximately 25.

MWA Overview and Recent Performance

Mueller Water Products Inc. (MWA) is a leading manufacturer of products used in the transmission, distribution, and measurement of water across North America. Its portfolio includes iron gate valves, fire hydrants, pipe repair systems, and advanced metering technologies, organized under two segments: Water Flow Solutions and Water Management Solutions. The company is a direct beneficiary of aging U.S. water infrastructure and associated public-sector replacement spending.

Mueller's fiscal 2025, which ended September 30, 2025, marked a record performance year. Full-year net sales climbed 8.7% to $1.43 billion, adjusted operating income rose 25.4% to $279.1 million, and adjusted EBITDA reached $326.2 million — a 14.6% increase. The fourth quarter was particularly strong, with net sales up 9.4% and adjusted operating margin expanding to 20.7% from 16.2% a year earlier. These gains reflected volume growth across most product lines, manufacturing efficiency improvements, and the closure of a legacy brass foundry that is expected to enhance margins going forward.

In more recent trading, MWA shares have traded in the $24–$26 range, with the stock currently around $25. The company carries a trailing P/E ratio near 19, a meaningful discount to Graco. Analyst sentiment is mixed: Barclays initiated coverage with an "Underweight" rating and a $25 price target in late June, while RBC raised its target to $31 with a "Sector Perform" rating. Director Brian Healy purchased 1,183 shares in early July, a modest insider confidence signal. Year-to-date, MWA has returned approximately 6%, outperforming GGG over that timeframe.

Trending AI Robots

For traders and investors who prefer a data-driven, automated approach to navigating markets like these, Tickeron offers a compelling resource: the Trending AI Robots page. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots, each designed to trade thousands of different tickers using distinct strategies, timeframes, and risk parameters. Only a select subset earns a place in the Trending AI Robots section — those whose algorithms are most closely aligned with current market conditions. These bots span a wide range of trading styles, from short-term momentum and swing trading to longer-term trend-following approaches, with some delivering statistically significant win rates and annualized returns that attract serious attention from active traders. The curated list is updated dynamically, making it a practical discovery tool for anyone looking to complement their own analysis with AI-driven signals. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Although both GGG and MWA fall under the broad industrial manufacturing umbrella, their business models diverge sharply. Graco serves a wide range of end markets — construction, automotive, semiconductor, food and beverage, and oil and gas — across the Americas, EMEA (Europe, Middle East, and Africa), and Asia Pacific. This diversification provides resilience but also exposes the company to cyclical construction headwinds, particularly in North America where roughly half of Graco's revenue is tied to construction activity. Mueller, by contrast, is overwhelmingly concentrated in North American municipal water infrastructure, a market with more predictable, replacement-driven demand but limited geographic diversification.

On profitability, Graco holds a clear edge. Its net margin exceeds 23%, nearly double Mueller's approximately 14%, reflecting the pricing power and aftermarket revenue streams inherent in its specialized fluid-handling equipment. Graco's return on equity (ROE) of roughly 19–21% also outpaces Mueller's, and the company has raised its dividend for 20 consecutive years. Mueller, however, has been closing the margin gap through operational improvements — its adjusted EBITDA margin expanded to 22.8% in fiscal 2025, and the closure of its legacy brass foundry should support further gains.

Growth dynamics present an interesting contrast. Mueller's fiscal 2025 revenue growth of 8.7% exceeded Graco's 5.8% for the comparable calendar year, driven by strong municipal spending. Yet Graco's Q2 2026 order acceleration — organic orders up 5%, with recent weeks showing 14% booking growth — suggests its growth trajectory may be inflecting upward at a time when Mueller faces a more uncertain tariff and currency environment. Valuation also differs: MWA's P/E of approximately 19 reflects a discount to GGG's P/E of roughly 25, though the premium Graco commands is supported by its wider moat, global reach, and superior margin profile.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, relative positioning, and catalyst profiles, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely lean toward Graco Inc. (GGG) in the current environment — though this leaning is probabilistic rather than definitive. Graco's combination of accelerating organic orders, a growing backlog, expanding margins, and a recent earnings-driven sentiment reset provides a more clearly defined positive momentum signal. While Mueller Water Products (MWA) has delivered stronger year-to-date price performance and enjoys structural demand from infrastructure spending, its narrower geographic focus, recent analyst caution, and tariff-related uncertainty introduce variables that an AI model would weigh carefully. Both stocks merit attention, but the convergence of improving leading indicators at Graco — particularly the 14% six-week booking surge — gives it a marginally more favorable risk-reward configuration according to the pattern-recognition frameworks that power Tickeron's analysis.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GGG vs. MWA commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGG is a StrongBuy and MWA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (GGG: $79.38 vs. MWA: $25.24)
Brand notoriety: GGG and MWA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GGG: 128% vs. MWA: 125%
Market capitalization -- GGG: $12.86B vs. MWA: $3.95B
GGG [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $12.86B. MWA’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $3.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $263.75B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $16.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GGG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMWA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GGG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MWA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MWA is a better buy in the long-term than GGG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GGG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MWA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GGG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MWA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MWA is a better buy in the short-term than GGG.

Price Growth

GGG (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -0.15% price change this week, while MWA (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +0.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +1.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

GGG is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

MWA is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (+1.12% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GGG($12.9B) has a higher market cap than MWA($3.95B). GGG has higher P/E ratio than MWA: GGG (24.96) vs MWA (19.12). MWA YTD gains are higher at: 6.495 vs. GGG (-2.117). GGG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 763M vs. MWA (343M). GGG has more cash in the bank: 508M vs. MWA (421M). GGG has less debt than MWA: GGG (52.2M) vs MWA (452M). GGG has higher revenues than MWA: GGG (2.27B) vs MWA (1.46B).
GGGMWAGGG / MWA
Capitalization12.9B3.95B327%
EBITDA763M343M222%
Gain YTD-2.1176.495-33%
P/E Ratio24.9619.12131%
Revenue2.27B1.46B155%
Total Cash508M421M121%
Total Debt52.2M452M12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GGG vs MWA: Fundamental Ratings
GGG
MWA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1010
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7628
SMR RATING
1..100
4545
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5358
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6982
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6565

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MWA's Valuation (26) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as GGG (43). This means that MWA’s stock grew similarly to GGG’s over the last 12 months.

MWA's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GGG (76). This means that MWA’s stock grew somewhat faster than GGG’s over the last 12 months.

MWA's SMR Rating (45) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as GGG (45). This means that MWA’s stock grew similarly to GGG’s over the last 12 months.

GGG's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as MWA (58). This means that GGG’s stock grew similarly to MWA’s over the last 12 months.

GGG's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as MWA (82). This means that GGG’s stock grew similarly to MWA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GGGMWA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GGG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MWA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EDRY26.511.00
+3.92%
EuroDry Ltd
ATAI7.18N/A
N/A
AtaiBeckley Inc
GL182.25-0.73
-0.40%
Globe Life
FEED0.32N/A
-1.22%
ENvue Medical Inc
VSTM5.80-0.30
-4.92%
Verastem

GGG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GGG has been closely correlated with LECO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GGG jumps, then LECO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGG
1D Price
Change %
GGG100%
-0.76%
LECO - GGG
74%
Closely correlated
+4.43%
ITW - GGG
73%
Closely correlated
+1.15%
AOS - GGG
72%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
NDSN - GGG
72%
Closely correlated
+0.86%
ROP - GGG
72%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
More

MWA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MWA has been loosely correlated with SPXC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MWA jumps, then SPXC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MWA
1D Price
Change %
MWA100%
+1.16%
SPXC - MWA
65%
Loosely correlated
+10.20%
GGG - MWA
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
WTS - MWA
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
GRC - MWA
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
FELE - MWA
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
More