MWA
Price
$25.54
Change
+$0.03 (+0.12%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
3.99B
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SPXC
Price
$217.32
Change
+$5.16 (+2.43%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
10.88B
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MWA vs SPXC

MWA vs SPXC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Mueller Water Products (MWA) vs. SPX Technologies (SPXC) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • MWA operates in water infrastructure with steady demand and a dividend yield of approximately 1.1%, but has drawn mixed analyst sentiment with a consensus Hold rating and a price target near $30.
  • SPXC is riding secular growth in HVAC (heating, ventilation, and air conditioning) and data center cooling, with 10 out of 11 analysts rating it a Buy and an average price target near $255.
  • SPXC delivered full-year 2025 revenue of $2.27 billion (up 14.2%) and guided for approximately 13% revenue growth in 2026, while MWA posted fiscal 2025 revenue of $1.43 billion (up 8.7%).
  • MWA trades at a trailing P/E (price-to-earnings ratio) of roughly 19, reflecting its mature, utility-like profile, whereas SPXC commands a P/E above 40, reflecting higher growth expectations and data center momentum.
  • The two stocks serve fundamentally different investor mandates: MWA appeals to those seeking stability and income, while SPXC attracts growth-oriented capital willing to accept higher volatility.
  • Both companies face tariff-related headwinds, but SPXC's exposure to steel and aluminum tariffs under Section 232 has drawn more explicit management commentary about near-term margin pressure.

Introduction

Investors comparing MWA (Mueller Water Products, Inc.) and SPXC (SPX Technologies, Inc.) are effectively weighing two distinct industrial growth narratives. Mueller Water Products is a North American leader in water transmission, distribution, and measurement products—a sector closely tied to municipal infrastructure spending and replacement cycles. SPX Technologies, by contrast, has pivoted aggressively into HVAC and engineered air movement solutions, with data center cooling emerging as a defining growth catalyst. Both companies reported strong fiscal-year results in recent quarters, yet their market positioning, valuation profiles, and growth trajectories diverge meaningfully. This comparison is particularly relevant for investors seeking to allocate capital between a steady, income-producing industrial name and a higher-growth, momentum-driven competitor within the broader industrial sector.

MWA Overview and Recent Performance

Mueller Water Products, headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, manufactures and markets a broad portfolio of products used in the transmission, distribution, and measurement of water across North America. The company operates through two segments—Water Flow Solutions and Water Management Solutions—and its brands include recognizable names such as Canada Valve, Centurion, Hersey, HYMAX, and Echologics. MWA's end markets are primarily municipal water utilities, where demand is driven by aging infrastructure replacement, regulatory compliance, and population growth.

In its most recently reported fiscal year ended September 30, 2025, MWA delivered record results: net sales increased 8.7% to $1.43 billion, adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) rose 14.6% to $326.2 million, and adjusted earnings per share grew 36.5% to $1.31. The company benefited from manufacturing efficiencies, volume growth, and favorable pricing, with adjusted operating margin expanding to 19.5%. In its fiscal second quarter of 2026, MWA posted EPS of $0.40, narrowly surpassing consensus estimates, with revenue rising 5.5% year-over-year to approximately $384 million. The company has guided for fiscal 2026 revenue of approximately $1.5 billion.

Recent market activity has been characterized by cautious sentiment. Barclays initiated coverage with an Underweight rating and a $25 price target in late June 2026, while Goldman Sachs and RBC Capital maintained Neutral and Sector Perform ratings, respectively. On a constructive note, Director Brian C. Healy purchased 1,183 shares at $25.33 in early July 2026 under a pre-arranged trading plan, signaling insider confidence. As of late July 2026, MWA trades near $25 with a trailing P/E of roughly 19 and offers a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share, equating to an annualized yield of approximately 1.1%. The stock's 52-week range spans $22.74 to $31.00, reflecting a relatively contained volatility profile consistent with its defensive end-market exposure.

SPXC Overview and Recent Performance

SPX Technologies, based in Charlotte, North Carolina, is a diversified supplier of highly engineered products and technologies across two primary segments: HVAC and Detection & Measurement. The HVAC segment—now the company's primary growth engine—encompasses engineered air movement, cooling solutions, and electric heat products. The Detection & Measurement segment provides leak detection, pipe assessment, fluid flow measurement, and gas detection equipment. A pivotal development in SPXC's growth story has been its deepening exposure to data center cooling, where management recently raised its 2026 growth outlook from 50% to 70% year-over-year, citing accelerating demand from hyperscaler and colocation customers.

SPXC's full-year 2025 results underscored robust momentum: revenue climbed 14.2% to $2.27 billion, adjusted EBITDA increased 20.5% to $507.4 million, and adjusted EPS rose 21.1% to $6.76. In the first quarter of 2026, the company delivered revenue of $566.8 million (up 17.4% year-over-year) and adjusted EPS of $1.69, both exceeding consensus expectations. Management guided for full-year 2026 revenue of $2.535 billion to $2.605 billion and adjusted EPS of $7.60 to $8.00, implying approximately 13% and 15% year-over-year growth at the respective midpoints. Recent acquisitions—including Thermolec, the air handling segment of Crawford United, Air Enterprises, and Rahn Industries—have further scaled its HVAC capabilities.

Analyst sentiment on SPXC is overwhelmingly positive. Ten of eleven covering analysts rate the stock a Buy, with Truist Securities recently raising its price target to $295 and BMO Capital initiating coverage with an Outperform rating. The stock was recently added to the S&P 400 mid-cap index after graduating from the S&P 600. However, SPXC has experienced bouts of volatility in recent weeks. As of late July 2026, shares trade around $219, well below the 52-week high of approximately $251 hit in late June. The pullback reflects broader profit-taking and rotation dynamics, as well as near-term concerns about Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum, which management expects will mainly pressure HVAC margins in the second quarter before mitigation efforts take hold. The stock's trailing P/E exceeds 40, and it carries a beta of 1.27, indicating above-market sensitivity.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking a data-driven approach to navigating comparisons like MWA versus SPXC, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to adapt to evolving market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots—each with distinct trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and target tickers—but only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market dynamics earn a spot in the Trending AI Robots section. These bots employ sophisticated algorithms that analyze technical indicators, fundamental data, and market patterns across thousands of tickers. Some bots focus on short-term momentum plays, while others emphasize longer-duration trend-following or swing trading approaches. Performance metrics vary by bot, with many showcasing track records that include win rates, Sharpe ratios, and trade-by-trade transparency. Whether you are comparing industrial names like MWA and SPXC or scanning for opportunities across entirely different sectors, exploring the Trending AI Robots can help you identify algorithmically vetted ideas suited to today's market environment.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The most fundamental contrast between MWA and SPXC lies in their growth profiles and the market narratives underpinning them. MWA is anchored to municipal water infrastructure—a reliably steady but relatively slow-growing end market where demand is shaped by multi-year replacement cycles and public spending budgets. SPXC, meanwhile, is tethered to the secular expansion of data centers and HVAC modernization, markets currently experiencing significant capital inflows. This difference manifests vividly in the numbers: SPXC's fiscal 2025 revenue growth of 14.2% nearly doubled MWA's 8.7%, and SPXC's 2026 guidance implies continued double-digit expansion, while MWA's growth is expected to moderate into the mid-single digits.

Valuation multiples further reflect this gap. MWA trades at approximately 19 times trailing earnings, a multiple consistent with a mature industrial firm offering modest growth and a dividend. SPXC trades north of 40 times trailing earnings, a premium justified by its higher growth rate, expanding addressable market in data center cooling, and an active M&A (mergers and acquisitions) strategy that has consistently added scale and capabilities. The trade-off is volatility: SPXC's beta of 1.27 versus MWA's 1.03 indicates that SPXC shares are more sensitive to broader market swings, and the stock's recent retreat from its June highs illustrates this dynamic clearly.

On the risk side, both companies navigate tariff exposure, but the nature differs. MWA's brass and iron input costs are sensitive to trade policy, though the impact has been manageable. SPXC faces a more acute challenge from Section 232 steel and aluminum tariffs, particularly in its HVAC segment, where management expects to offset only about 50% of the impact through pricing and localization. Additionally, SPXC's growth is partly acquisition-dependent, introducing integration risk, while MWA's organic model carries fewer such variables. From a capital-return perspective, MWA's 1.1% dividend yield and active share repurchase program provide tangible shareholder returns, whereas SPXC reinvests heavily into capacity expansion and M&A, offering no dividend.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors—including trend consistency, earnings momentum, analyst conviction, and secular growth catalysts—Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely exhibit a preference for SPXC over MWA in the current market environment. SPXC's combination of accelerating data center demand, a robust M&A pipeline, capacity expansion initiatives, and overwhelmingly bullish analyst coverage (with a consensus target implying meaningful upside from current levels) creates a powerful trend-following signal. While MWA offers stability, insider buying support, and a dividend cushion, its slower growth trajectory and mixed analyst sentiment—including an Underweight initiation from Barclays—suggest a less compelling near-term momentum profile. That said, the AI framework would acknowledge that MWA's lower valuation and defensive characteristics could make it the more suitable candidate for risk-averse strategies or portfolios seeking exposure to water infrastructure without elevated volatility. The choice ultimately hinges on whether one prioritizes growth momentum and secular tailwinds or valuation discipline and income generation.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
MWA vs. SPXC commentary
Aug 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MWA is a StrongBuy and SPXC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2026
Stock price -- (MWA: $25.54 vs. SPXC: $217.32)
Brand notoriety: MWA and SPXC are both not notable
MWA represents the Industrial Machinery, while SPXC is part of the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MWA: 50% vs. SPXC: 33%
Market capitalization -- MWA: $3.99B vs. SPXC: $10.88B
MWA [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $3.99B. SPXC’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $10.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $283.18B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $105.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $17.26B. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $11.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MWA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSPXC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MWA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SPXC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MWA is a better buy in the long-term than SPXC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MWA’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SPXC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MWA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SPXC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MWA is a better buy in the short-term than SPXC.

Price Growth

MWA (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -3.91% price change this week, while SPXC (@Building Products) price change was +0.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.00%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -3.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

MWA is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2026.

SPXC is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (+1.10% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

@Building Products (-3.55% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPXC($10.9B) has a higher market cap than MWA($3.99B). SPXC has higher P/E ratio than MWA: SPXC (38.19) vs MWA (17.99). SPXC YTD gains are higher at: 8.627 vs. MWA (8.044). SPXC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 534M vs. MWA (352M). MWA has less debt than SPXC: MWA (452M) vs SPXC (615M). SPXC has higher revenues than MWA: SPXC (2.48B) vs MWA (1.48B).
MWASPXCMWA / SPXC
Capitalization3.99B10.9B37%
EBITDA352M534M66%
Gain YTD8.0448.62793%
P/E Ratio17.9938.1947%
Revenue1.48B2.48B60%
Total CashN/A166M-
Total Debt452M615M73%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MWA vs SPXC: Fundamental Ratings
MWA
SPXC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1274
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2716
SMR RATING
1..100
4459
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5958
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8658
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MWA's Valuation (21) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SPXC (74) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that MWA’s stock grew somewhat faster than SPXC’s over the last 12 months.

SPXC's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as MWA (27) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that SPXC’s stock grew similarly to MWA’s over the last 12 months.

MWA's SMR Rating (44) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as SPXC (59) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that MWA’s stock grew similarly to SPXC’s over the last 12 months.

SPXC's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as MWA (59) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that SPXC’s stock grew similarly to MWA’s over the last 12 months.

SPXC's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as MWA (86) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that SPXC’s stock grew similarly to MWA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MWASPXC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MWA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SPXC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KTOS64.581.79
+2.85%
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions
ECCC24.65-0.02
-0.09%
Eagle Point Credit Company
DJT8.27-0.03
-0.36%
Trump Media & Technology Group Corp
TRC16.35-0.06
-0.37%
Tejon Ranch Co
CNVS2.69-0.18
-6.27%
Cineverse Corp

MWA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MWA has been loosely correlated with SPXC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MWA jumps, then SPXC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MWA
1D Price
Change %
MWA100%
+0.12%
SPXC - MWA
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.43%
GGG - MWA
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
GRC - MWA
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.35%
WTS - MWA
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
IR - MWA
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.12%
More

SPXC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPXC has been loosely correlated with MWA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SPXC jumps, then MWA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPXC
1D Price
Change %
SPXC100%
+2.43%
MWA - SPXC
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
ITT - SPXC
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.25%
PH - SPXC
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.29%
IR - SPXC
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.12%
AME - SPXC
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
More