GLW
Price
$192.43
Change
+$8.40 (+4.56%)
Updated
Jul 9, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
158.38B
19 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QCOM
Price
$191.46
Change
+$4.90 (+2.63%)
Updated
Jul 9, 04:57 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
196.63B
27 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLW vs QCOM

GLW vs QCOM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLW vs. QCOM commentary
Jul 09, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLW is a Buy and QCOM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 09, 2026
Stock price -- (GLW: $184.03 vs. QCOM: $182.97)
Brand notoriety: GLW and QCOM are both notable
GLW represents the Electronic Components, while QCOM is part of the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLW: 52% vs. QCOM: 33%
Market capitalization -- GLW: $158.38B vs. QCOM: $196.63B
GLW [@Electronic Components] is valued at $158.38B. QCOM’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $196.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $194.65B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $4.94T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $13.75B. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $188.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileQCOM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GLW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • QCOM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, QCOM is a better buy in the long-term than GLW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLW’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QCOM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLW’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • QCOM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QCOM is a better buy in the short-term than GLW.

Price Growth

GLW (@Electronic Components) experienced а -16.59% price change this week, while QCOM (@Semiconductors) price change was +0.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.98%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +2.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +64.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLW is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

QCOM is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (-1.16% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

@Semiconductors (+2.26% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QCOM($197B) has a higher market cap than GLW($158B). GLW has higher P/E ratio than QCOM: GLW (88.48) vs QCOM (20.06). GLW YTD gains are higher at: 110.891 vs. QCOM (8.053). QCOM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14B vs. GLW (4.07B). QCOM has more cash in the bank: 9.8B vs. GLW (1.76B). GLW has less debt than QCOM: GLW (9.92B) vs QCOM (15.3B). QCOM has higher revenues than GLW: QCOM (44.5B) vs GLW (16.3B).
GLWQCOMGLW / QCOM
Capitalization158B197B80%
EBITDA4.07B14B29%
Gain YTD110.8918.0531,377%
P/E Ratio88.4820.06441%
Revenue16.3B44.5B37%
Total Cash1.76B9.8B18%
Total Debt9.92B15.3B65%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLW vs QCOM: Fundamental Ratings
GLW
QCOM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7959
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2262
SMR RATING
1..100
5427
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
347
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6429
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QCOM's Valuation (43) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLW (76) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that QCOM’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLW’s over the last 12 months.

GLW's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QCOM (62) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that GLW’s stock grew somewhat faster than QCOM’s over the last 12 months.

QCOM's SMR Rating (27) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as GLW (54) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that QCOM’s stock grew similarly to GLW’s over the last 12 months.

GLW's Price Growth Rating (3) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QCOM (47) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that GLW’s stock grew somewhat faster than QCOM’s over the last 12 months.

QCOM's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLW (64) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that QCOM’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLWQCOM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QCOM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSWC23.51N/A
N/A
Capital Southwest Corp
NSPR0.72N/A
N/A
InspireMD
MGNX4.75N/A
N/A
MacroGenics
XENE63.37N/A
N/A
Xenon Pharmaceuticals
LIN538.23N/A
N/A
Linde plc

GLW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLW has been loosely correlated with FN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLW jumps, then FN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLW
1D Price
Change %
GLW100%
-0.73%
FN - GLW
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.47%
BHE - GLW
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
JBL - GLW
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.29%
TTMI - GLW
59%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CLS - GLW
56%
Loosely correlated
+4.54%
More