GM
Price
$48.13
Change
+$0.66 (+1.39%)
Updated
Jun 9, 12:16 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
52.35B
43 days until earnings call
MULN
Price
$6.12
Change
-$0.29 (-4.52%)
Updated
Jun 9, 02:16 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
34.07M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GM vs MULN

Header iconGM vs MULN Comparison
Open Charts GM vs MULNBanner chart's image
General Motors
Price$48.13
Change+$0.66 (+1.39%)
Volume$1.66K
Capitalization52.35B
Mullen Automotive
Price$6.12
Change-$0.29 (-4.52%)
Volume$10.19K
Capitalization34.07M
GM vs MULN Comparison Chart
Loading...
GM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MULN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GM vs. MULN commentary
Jun 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GM is a Hold and MULN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 09, 2025
Stock price -- (GM: $47.47 vs. MULN: $6.41)
Brand notoriety: GM: Notable vs. MULN: Not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GM: 67% vs. MULN: 301%
Market capitalization -- GM: $52.35B vs. MULN: $34.07M
GM [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $52.35B. MULN’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $34.07M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $559.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $35.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMULN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MULN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GM is a better buy in the long-term than MULN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MULN’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MULN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GM is a better buy in the short-term than MULN.

Price Growth

GM (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а -4.01% price change this week, while MULN (@Motor Vehicles) price change was -21.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was +0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

GM is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

MULN is expected to report earnings on May 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (+0.15% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GM($52.4B) has a higher market cap than MULN($34.1M). GM has higher P/E ratio than MULN: GM (6.20) vs MULN (0.00). GM YTD gains are higher at: -10.376 vs. MULN (-99.999). GM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 23.2B vs. MULN (-686.05M). GM has more cash in the bank: 26.5B vs. MULN (81.5M). MULN has less debt than GM: MULN (19M) vs GM (123B). GM has higher revenues than MULN: GM (172B) vs MULN (366K).
GMMULNGM / MULN
Capitalization52.4B34.1M153,666%
EBITDA23.2B-686.05M-3,382%
Gain YTD-10.376-99.99910%
P/E Ratio6.200.00565,893%
Revenue172B366K46,994,536%
Total Cash26.5B81.5M32,515%
Total Debt123B19M647,368%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GM vs MULN: Fundamental Ratings
GM
MULN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
53100
SMR RATING
1..100
62100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5498
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
30100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GM's Valuation (50) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as MULN (57) in the null industry. This means that GM’s stock grew similarly to MULN’s over the last 12 months.

GM's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Motor Vehicles industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MULN (100) in the null industry. This means that GM’s stock grew somewhat faster than MULN’s over the last 12 months.

GM's SMR Rating (62) in the Motor Vehicles industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MULN (100) in the null industry. This means that GM’s stock grew somewhat faster than MULN’s over the last 12 months.

GM's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Motor Vehicles industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MULN (98) in the null industry. This means that GM’s stock grew somewhat faster than MULN’s over the last 12 months.

GM's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Motor Vehicles industry is significantly better than the same rating for MULN (100) in the null industry. This means that GM’s stock grew significantly faster than MULN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GMMULN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MULN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ROG67.010.55
+0.83%
Rogers Corp
COLM61.780.48
+0.78%
Columbia Sportswear Company
KZR4.400.02
+0.46%
Kezar Life Sciences Inc
ONTF5.53N/A
N/A
ON24
TRP50.74-0.63
-1.23%
TC Energy Corp

GM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GM has been closely correlated with HMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GM jumps, then HMC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GM
1D Price
Change %
GM100%
+0.79%
HMC - GM
68%
Closely correlated
+1.53%
F - GM
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.58%
TM - GM
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
STLA - GM
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.96%
MBGYY - GM
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

MULN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MULN and F have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MULN and F's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MULN
1D Price
Change %
MULN100%
-20.96%
F - MULN
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.58%
GM - MULN
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
WKHS - MULN
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.41%
CENN - MULN
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
TSLA - MULN
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.67%
More