GOEX
Price
$90.42
Change
+$0.28 (+0.31%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
132.62M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SILJ
Price
$30.49
Change
-$0.16 (-0.52%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
4.01B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GOEX vs SILJ

GOEX vs SILJ Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) vs. Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ)

Key Takeaways

  • Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) provides targeted exposure to global gold exploration and development companies, while Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) focuses exclusively on junior silver mining firms, creating distinct commodity and risk profiles within the precious metals sector.
  • GOEX tracks the Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return Index with approximately 52 holdings and a 0.65% expense ratio, emphasizing earlier-stage gold assets; SILJ follows the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index with roughly 67 holdings and a 0.69% expense ratio, concentrating on smaller silver producers and explorers.
  • Both ETFs employ passive indexing strategies with quarterly or semi-annual rebalancing, offering investors thematic access to precious metals without leverage or inverse features, though their sector allocations remain narrowly concentrated in mining equities.
  • GOEX generally exhibits broader geographic diversification across developed and emerging markets in gold-related activities, whereas SILJ maintains a more concentrated focus on silver-specific junior miners, resulting in differentiated volatility and correlation patterns to underlying commodity prices.
  • Expense ratios are competitive within the thematic precious metals category, with GOEX offering a modest cost advantage; liquidity profiles support institutional and retail participation in both funds during normal market conditions.
  • These ETFs serve as complementary rather than direct substitutes, allowing investors to express views on gold versus silver market dynamics through specialized equity exposure.

Introduction

Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) attract attention from investors seeking specialized exposure to precious metals equities. They do not compete head-to-head but instead deliver differentiated access within the mining sector: GOEX targets gold exploration and development firms, while SILJ emphasizes junior silver miners. This comparison helps clarify structural distinctions, cost structures, and thematic positioning amid ongoing interest in commodity-linked strategies.

Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) Overview

Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return Index. The index measures performance of companies involved in gold exploration and development activities worldwide. The fund typically holds around 52 securities, with top positions often including firms such as Hecla Mining Co., Eldorado Gold Corp., and Coeur Mining Inc. Sector allocation centers on materials, specifically gold mining equities, with exposure spanning developed and emerging markets. The expense ratio stands at 0.65%. As a non-leveraged, thematic passive product, it rebalances periodically to maintain index alignment and provides efficient single-trade access to the gold exploration theme.

Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) Overview

Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund designed to track the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. The index focuses on companies deriving the majority of revenues from silver mining, production, or related exploration and development. The fund generally maintains approximately 67 holdings, with significant positions frequently held in names such as Hecla Mining Co., First Majestic Silver Corp., and Coeur Mining Inc. Allocations concentrate in the materials sector, particularly silver-related equities, with a tilt toward smaller-capitalization issuers. The expense ratio is 0.69%. This non-leveraged thematic passive vehicle rebalances on a quarterly basis and delivers targeted exposure to the junior silver mining segment.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The precious metals mining sector responds to macroeconomic factors including interest rate expectations, inflation trends, geopolitical developments, and shifts in global capital flows. Gold and silver equities often experience rotation during periods of economic uncertainty or monetary policy easing. Regulatory developments around mining permits and environmental standards can influence operational timelines for exploration companies. Both gold and silver themes face risks from commodity price volatility, supply constraints, and changes in investor sentiment toward hard assets, though capital flows into mining equities have shown resilience across recent market cycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) have displayed performance patterns tied to their underlying commodity exposures. Gold-focused holdings in GOEX tend to benefit from sustained central bank demand and safe-haven flows, while silver-centric positions in SILJ often exhibit greater sensitivity to industrial demand and solar energy trends. Relative volatility has varied with commodity price swings, with junior miners in both funds showing amplified responses to earnings reports and exploration results. Sector rotation and interest rate expectations have influenced positioning, with GOEX generally offering broader gold-development diversification and SILJ providing more concentrated silver leverage.

AI Screener

AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights on ETFs like GOEX or SILJ may find the platform useful for refining their research process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic preference to Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) due to its slightly lower expense ratio, comparable diversification within the gold theme, and alignment with broader precious metals momentum observed in recent cycles. SILJ offers compelling silver-specific exposure but carries a marginally higher cost and narrower thematic focus that may elevate risk in certain macro environments.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GOEX vs. SILJ commentary
Sep 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GOEX is a Hold and SILJ is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SILJ has more net assets: 4.01B vs. GOEX (133M). GOEX has a higher annual dividend yield than SILJ: GOEX (12.341) vs SILJ (10.192). GOEX was incepted earlier than SILJ: GOEX (16 years) vs SILJ (14 years). GOEX (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than SILJ (0.69). SILJ has a higher turnover GOEX (27.01) vs GOEX (27.01).
GOEXSILJGOEX / SILJ
Gain YTD12.34110.192121%
Net Assets133M4.01B3%
Total Expense Ratio0.650.6994%
Turnover27.0147.0057%
Yield1.901.77108%
Fund Existence16 years14 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GOEXSILJ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
GOEX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SILJ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INEQ41.920.54
+1.30%
Columbia Intl Equ Income ETF
FCOM72.080.74
+1.04%
Fidelity MSCI Communication ServicesETF
TPHD42.550.20
+0.47%
Timothy Plan High Dividend Stock ETF
PSFM35.58N/A
N/A
Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF
LITL33.60-0.22
-0.66%
Simplify Piper Sandler Us Small-Cap Plus Income ETF

GOEX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GOEX has been closely correlated with EQX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GOEX jumps, then EQX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GOEX
1D Price
Change %
GOEX100%
+0.31%
EQX - GOEX
85%
Closely correlated
+1.64%
AGI - GOEX
84%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
DRD - GOEX
83%
Closely correlated
+1.66%
SKE - GOEX
81%
Closely correlated
+1.54%
OGC - GOEX
81%
Closely correlated
+0.60%
More

SILJ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SILJ has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SILJ jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SILJ
1D Price
Change %
SILJ100%
-0.52%
PAAS - SILJ
93%
Closely correlated
-0.61%
CDE - SILJ
91%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
WPM - SILJ
91%
Closely correlated
+2.08%
SKE - SILJ
88%
Closely correlated
+1.54%
OR - SILJ
87%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
More