Advertisement
GOLD vs RGLD
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Gold.com, Inc. (GOLD) vs. Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Gold.com, Inc. (GOLD) has delivered stronger year-to-date (YTD) performance at 25.63% compared to Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD)'s 4.14%.
- RGLD commands a significantly larger market capitalization of $19.6 billion versus GOLD's $1.2 billion, reflecting greater scale.
- Both stocks benefit from precious metals exposure amid gold price fluctuations, but RGLD projects 32% higher gold sales volumes for 2026.
- GOLD offers a higher dividend yield of 1.88% compared to RGLD's 0.82%.
- Analyst price targets suggest upside potential: 53% for GOLD and 45% for RGLD.
Introduction
Gold.com, Inc. (GOLD) and Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) operate within the precious metals sector, offering distinct approaches to capitalizing on gold and silver market dynamics. GOLD focuses on trading and lending, while RGLD emphasizes royalties and streams. This stock comparison is relevant for investors seeking exposure to gold amid recent volatility in commodity prices and shifting market sentiment. Traders monitoring relative performance and sector positioning will find insights into momentum, risks, and growth drivers in the current environment.
GOLD Overview and Recent Performance
Gold.com, Inc. (GOLD), formerly A-Mark Precious Metals, engages in wholesale sales, direct-to-consumer retail, and secured lending of precious metals like gold, silver, and platinum. Operating globally, it serves dealers, investors, and institutions. In recent market activity, GOLD shares have traded around $42.63, within a 52-week range of $19.39 to $66.70. The stock has posted robust YTD gains of 25.63%, outperforming broader markets despite short-term dips linked to gold price corrections. Sentiment has been buoyed by an expanded share repurchase program adding 2 million shares and positive analyst views, with a consensus "Strong Buy" rating and average target of $65.50. Elevated price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 88.81 reflects growth expectations amid physical metals demand.
RGLD Overview and Recent Performance
Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) acquires and manages precious metal streams and royalties across properties in the Americas, Africa, and Australia Pacific. This model provides exposure to gold, silver, and other metals without operational risks of mining. Shares recently hovered near $230.59, in a 52-week band of $150.75 to $306.25. YTD performance stands at 4.14%, with recent weeks showing resilience amid gold sector pressures. Key influences include upbeat 2026 guidance projecting 32% higher gold sales volumes at midpoint and upcoming Q1 results on May 6. Analysts maintain "Strong Buy" ratings, with targets averaging $335.33, supported by high profit margins of 45.63%.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page spotlights 25 top-performing AI trading bots selected from over 350 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These curated agents excel in current market conditions, showcasing annualized returns ranging from +83% to +163%, win rates of 51% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.70. Diverse strategies span short-term signals, virtual portfolios with risk management, and brokerage automation, targeting themes like semiconductors, gold miners, and volatility plays. Each bot details unique timeframes, performance stats, and traded tickers, enabling users to copy proven approaches. Explore these high-potential options to enhance trading efficiency.
Head-to-Head Comparison
GOLD and RGLD differ in business models: GOLD's active trading and lending expose it to inventory and credit risks, while RGLD's passive royalty streams offer stable cash flows tied to mine production. Growth drivers include GOLD's retail demand and RGLD's project financings. Recent momentum favors GOLD on YTD returns, but RGLD shows trend consistency with lower beta (0.55 vs. 0.61). Risk factors: GOLD's higher debt-to-equity (129.62%) and P/E versus RGLD's superior margins. Both benefit from gold exposure, with positive sector sentiment amid economic uncertainty.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors RGLD due to its trend consistency, higher profitability, upcoming catalysts like Q1 earnings and robust 2026 guidance, and relatively attractive valuation in the precious metals space. While GOLD exhibits stronger short-term momentum, RGLD's stability and positioning suggest higher probability of sustained outperformance probabilistically.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GOLD is a StrongBuy and RGLD is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GOLD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRGLD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- GOLD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- RGLD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GOLD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGLD’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GOLD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- RGLD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
GOLD (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +1.74% price change this week, while RGLD (@Precious Metals) price change was +7.32% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +3.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.00%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +53.98%.
Reported Earning Dates
GOLD is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.
RGLD is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+3.26% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Precious Metals (+7.22% weekly)The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
| GOLD | RGLD | GOLD / RGLD | |
| Capitalization | 1.26B | 20.8B | 6% |
| EBITDA | 102M | 1.03B | 10% |
| Gain YTD | 27.837 | 10.710 | 260% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.13 | 29.64 | 48% |
| Revenue | 15.7B | 1.31B | 1,202% |
| Total Cash | 152M | 234M | 65% |
| Total Debt | 812M | 596M | 136% |
GOLD | RGLD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | 19 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 47 | 33 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 64 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 44 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 48 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RGLD's Valuation (19) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GOLD (75). This means that RGLD’s stock grew somewhat faster than GOLD’s over the last 12 months.
RGLD's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as GOLD (47). This means that RGLD’s stock grew similarly to GOLD’s over the last 12 months.
RGLD's SMR Rating (64) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as GOLD (89). This means that RGLD’s stock grew similarly to GOLD’s over the last 12 months.
GOLD's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as RGLD (53). This means that GOLD’s stock grew similarly to RGLD’s over the last 12 months.
RGLD's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GOLD (99). This means that RGLD’s stock grew somewhat faster than GOLD’s over the last 12 months.
| GOLD | RGLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 80% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 76% | 8 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 72% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MEMRX | 43.74 | N/A | N/A |
| MFS Emerging Markets Equity R1 | |||
| DCMDX | 16.92 | N/A | N/A |
| Dunham Monthly Distribution C | |||
| AFAVX | 12.63 | N/A | N/A |
| AMG River Road Focused Absolute Value I | |||
| SPMVX | 11.03 | N/A | N/A |
| Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 R5 | |||
| VLEIX | 66.26 | -0.08 | -0.12% |
| Value Line Small Cap Opportunities Instl | |||
RGLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGLD has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RGLD jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RGLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RGLD | 100% | +2.60% | ||
| WPM - RGLD | 84% Closely correlated | +3.56% | ||
| AEM - RGLD | 83% Closely correlated | +1.88% | ||
| KGC - RGLD | 80% Closely correlated | +0.95% | ||
| OR - RGLD | 80% Closely correlated | +3.59% | ||
| GOLD - RGLD | 80% Closely correlated | -4.43% | ||
More | ||||