GPI
Price
$423.18
Change
+$3.16 (+0.75%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
3.96B
76 days until earnings call
RMBL
Price
$2.13
Change
+$0.07 (+3.40%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
227.41M
4 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GPI vs RMBL

Header iconGPI vs RMBL Comparison
Open Charts GPI vs RMBLBanner chart's image
Group 1 Automotive
Price$423.18
Change+$3.16 (+0.75%)
Volume$112.97K
Capitalization3.96B
RumbleOn
Price$2.13
Change+$0.07 (+3.40%)
Volume$36.43K
Capitalization227.41M
GPI vs RMBL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GPI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GPI vs. RMBL commentary
Aug 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPI is a Buy and RMBL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 07, 2025
Stock price -- (GPI: $423.18 vs. RMBL: $2.13)
Brand notoriety: GPI and RMBL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GPI: 61% vs. RMBL: 27%
Market capitalization -- GPI: $3.96B vs. RMBL: $227.41M
GPI [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $3.96B. RMBL’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $227.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GPI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRMBL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GPI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RMBL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GPI is a better buy in the long-term than RMBL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GPI’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMBL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GPI’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RMBL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both GPI and RMBL are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

GPI (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +2.54% price change this week, while RMBL (@Specialty Stores) price change was -1.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -1.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

GPI is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

RMBL is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-1.03% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GPI($3.96B) has a higher market cap than RMBL($227M). GPI has higher P/E ratio than RMBL: GPI (6.77) vs RMBL (1.10). GPI YTD gains are higher at: 0.631 vs. RMBL (-60.681). GPI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.06B vs. RMBL (-55.9M). RMBL (58.9M) and GPI (57.2M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RMBL has less debt than GPI: RMBL (772M) vs GPI (3.9B). GPI has higher revenues than RMBL: GPI (17.9B) vs RMBL (1.37B).
GPIRMBLGPI / RMBL
Capitalization3.96B227M1,745%
EBITDA1.06B-55.9M-1,898%
Gain YTD0.631-60.681-1%
P/E Ratio6.771.10618%
Revenue17.9B1.37B1,310%
Total Cash57.2M58.9M97%
Total Debt3.9B772M505%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GPI vs RMBL: Fundamental Ratings
GPI
RMBL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6561
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8100
SMR RATING
1..100
5399
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6091
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
20100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5048

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RMBL's Valuation (40) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as GPI (66) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RMBL’s stock grew similarly to GPI’s over the last 12 months.

GPI's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for RMBL (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that GPI’s stock grew significantly faster than RMBL’s over the last 12 months.

GPI's SMR Rating (53) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RMBL (99) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that GPI’s stock grew somewhat faster than RMBL’s over the last 12 months.

GPI's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RMBL (91) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that GPI’s stock grew similarly to RMBL’s over the last 12 months.

GPI's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for RMBL (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that GPI’s stock grew significantly faster than RMBL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GPIRMBL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GPI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BBGLX27.280.27
+1.00%
Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth
USPVX32.090.15
+0.47%
Union Street Partners Value A
HFDSX19.17N/A
N/A
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps R4
FTXCX43.57N/A
N/A
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Gr C
FAVFX35.11N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Value A

GPI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPI has been closely correlated with AN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GPI jumps, then AN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPI
1D Price
Change %
GPI100%
+0.75%
AN - GPI
83%
Closely correlated
+0.01%
ABG - GPI
83%
Closely correlated
+0.10%
PAG - GPI
81%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
SAH - GPI
81%
Closely correlated
+2.55%
LAD - GPI
73%
Closely correlated
-0.29%
More

RMBL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMBL has been loosely correlated with HVT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RMBL jumps, then HVT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMBL
1D Price
Change %
RMBL100%
+3.64%
HVT - RMBL
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.80%
AN - RMBL
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.01%
HNST - RMBL
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.74%
CWH - RMBL
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
GPI - RMBL
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
More