Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSFPX vs TCBIX
GSFPX vs TCBIX Comparison
Open Charts GSFPX vs TCBIX
GSFPX vs TCBIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSFPX vs. TCBIX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSFPX is a StrongBuy and TCBIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSFPX has more cash in the bank: 3.9B vs. TCBIX (129M). TCBIX pays higher dividends than GSFPX: TCBIX (1.16) vs GSFPX (0.96). GSFPX was incepted earlier than TCBIX: GSFPX (8 years) vs TCBIX (13 years). TCBIX (1.57) is less costly to investors than GSFPX (0.74). TCBIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 121.00 vs. GSFPX (29.00). GSFPX (0) and TCBIX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GSFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.43 vs. TCBIX (8.32). GSFPX return over 5 years is better than : 34.02 vs. TCBIX (6.38).
| GSFPX | TCBIX | GSFPX / TCBIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.51 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.57 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.705 | 9.344 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.9B | 129M | 3,023% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 1.16 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.43 | 8.32 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.23 | 16.30 | 253% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.02 | 6.38 | 533% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 14.58 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement