GSIW
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.01 (-9.09%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
7.4M
LPLA
Price
$364.48
Change
-$0.35 (-0.10%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
29.16B
54 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GSIW vs LPLA

Header iconGSIW vs LPLA Comparison
Open Charts GSIW vs LPLABanner chart's image
Garden Stage
Price$0.10
Change-$0.01 (-9.09%)
Volume$7.8M
Capitalization7.4M
LPL Financial Holdings
Price$364.48
Change-$0.35 (-0.10%)
Volume$249.32K
Capitalization29.16B
GSIW vs LPLA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GSIW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LPLA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GSIW vs. LPLA commentary
Aug 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSIW is a Hold and LPLA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 30, 2025
Stock price -- (GSIW: $0.10 vs. LPLA: $364.48)
Brand notoriety: GSIW and LPLA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GSIW: 36% vs. LPLA: 31%
Market capitalization -- GSIW: $7.4M vs. LPLA: $29.16B
GSIW [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $7.4M. LPLA’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $29.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GSIW’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLPLA’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • GSIW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LPLA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, LPLA is a better buy in the long-term than GSIW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GSIW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LPLA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GSIW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LPLA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GSIW is a better buy in the short-term than LPLA.

Price Growth

GSIW (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -2.72% price change this week, while LPLA (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +0.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

LPLA is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.83% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LPLA($29.2B) has a higher market cap than GSIW($7.4M). LPLA YTD gains are higher at: 11.918 vs. GSIW (-84.985).
GSIWLPLAGSIW / LPLA
Capitalization7.4M29.2B0%
EBITDAN/A2.34B-
Gain YTD-84.98511.918-713%
P/E RatioN/A25.01-
RevenueN/A14.1B-
Total CashN/A4.31B-
Total DebtN/A7.34B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GSIW vs LPLA: Fundamental Ratings
GSIW
LPLA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7763
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10011
SMR RATING
1..100
10033
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9754
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10016
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GSIW's Valuation (65) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry is in the same range as LPLA (96) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that GSIW’s stock grew similarly to LPLA’s over the last 12 months.

LPLA's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for GSIW (100) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that LPLA’s stock grew significantly faster than GSIW’s over the last 12 months.

LPLA's SMR Rating (33) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for GSIW (100) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that LPLA’s stock grew significantly faster than GSIW’s over the last 12 months.

LPLA's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSIW (97) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that LPLA’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSIW’s over the last 12 months.

LPLA's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for GSIW (100) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that LPLA’s stock grew significantly faster than GSIW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSIWLPLA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GSIW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LPLA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MYNZ1.680.03
+1.82%
Mainz Biomed N.V.
HAE54.540.20
+0.37%
Haemonetics Corp
SVRA3.280.01
+0.31%
Savara
ATOM3.28-0.05
-1.50%
Atomera
UMC6.58-0.11
-1.64%
United Microelectronic Corp

GSIW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GSIW and FUTU have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GSIW and FUTU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSIW
1D Price
Change %
GSIW100%
-5.39%
FUTU - GSIW
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
LPLA - GSIW
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
CLSK - GSIW
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
MARA - GSIW
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
GS - GSIW
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
More

LPLA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LPLA has been closely correlated with IBKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LPLA jumps, then IBKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LPLA
1D Price
Change %
LPLA100%
-0.10%
IBKR - LPLA
73%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
SF - LPLA
71%
Closely correlated
-0.95%
RJF - LPLA
71%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
MS - LPLA
71%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
GS - LPLA
71%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
More