GSUS vs SNPS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSUS is a Hold and SNPS is a Hold.
SNPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 68 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GSUS | SNPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 84% | 15 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 72% | 6 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 72% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NDGCX | 21.90 | N/A | N/A |
| Neuberger Berman Dividend Growth C | |||
| RAIIX | 23.65 | N/A | N/A |
| Manning & Napier Rainier Intl Discv I | |||
| PAGLX | 43.64 | -0.20 | -0.46% |
| T. Rowe Price Global Growth Stock Adv | |||
| CFNEX | 89.84 | -0.75 | -0.83% |
| American Funds Fundamental Invs 529E | |||
| EMGCX | 21.27 | -0.19 | -0.89% |
| Allspring Emerging Markets Equity C | |||
GSUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSUS has been closely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSUS jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GSUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSUS | 100% | -0.39% | ||
| SNPS - GSUS | 71% Closely correlated | -1.96% | ||
| CDNS - GSUS | 71% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| LRCX - GSUS | 69% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| KLAC - GSUS | 68% Closely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| MSFT - GSUS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
More | ||||
SNPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNPS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNPS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS | 100% | -1.96% | ||
| CDNS - SNPS | 85% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| PDFS - SNPS | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| MSFT - SNPS | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| CLSK - SNPS | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| RIOT - SNPS | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.43% | ||
More | ||||