It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GVA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIESC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GVA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IESC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
GVA (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +0.83% price change this week, while IESC (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +0.34% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +1.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.30%.
GVA is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.
IESC is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.
Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
GVA | IESC | GVA / IESC | |
Capitalization | 3.39B | 3.74B | 91% |
EBITDA | 352M | 365M | 96% |
Gain YTD | -10.928 | -7.041 | 155% |
P/E Ratio | 29.25 | 17.39 | 168% |
Revenue | 4.01B | 3B | 134% |
Total Cash | 173M | 112M | 154% |
Total Debt | 833M | 41.1M | 2,027% |
GVA | IESC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 34 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 60 | 26 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | 79 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IESC's Valuation (68) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as GVA (100). This means that IESC’s stock grew similarly to GVA’s over the last 12 months.
GVA's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as IESC (34). This means that GVA’s stock grew similarly to IESC’s over the last 12 months.
IESC's SMR Rating (26) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GVA (60). This means that IESC’s stock grew somewhat faster than GVA’s over the last 12 months.
GVA's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as IESC (61). This means that GVA’s stock grew similarly to IESC’s over the last 12 months.
IESC's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as GVA (92). This means that IESC’s stock grew similarly to GVA’s over the last 12 months.
GVA | IESC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago65% | 1 day ago68% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago84% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 1 day ago86% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 1 day ago65% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 1 day ago82% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% | 1 day ago85% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago59% | 4 days ago67% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 1 day ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GVA has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GVA jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GVA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GVA | 100% | +1.77% | ||
MTZ - GVA | 73% Closely correlated | +3.64% | ||
EME - GVA | 70% Closely correlated | +2.93% | ||
PRIM - GVA | 69% Closely correlated | +4.02% | ||
FIX - GVA | 69% Closely correlated | +4.52% | ||
STRL - GVA | 68% Closely correlated | +4.61% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IESC has been closely correlated with EME. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IESC jumps, then EME could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IESC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IESC | 100% | +5.23% | ||
EME - IESC | 75% Closely correlated | +2.93% | ||
MTZ - IESC | 75% Closely correlated | +3.64% | ||
STRL - IESC | 72% Closely correlated | +4.61% | ||
PWR - IESC | 69% Closely correlated | +4.76% | ||
PRIM - IESC | 68% Closely correlated | +4.02% | ||
More |