Advertisement
IESC vs PWR
Which Stock Would AI Choose? IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) vs. Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both IESC and PWR operate in the engineering and construction sector, focusing on electrical and infrastructure services, with strong demand from data centers and utilities driving recent performance.
- IESC reported Q2 fiscal 2026 revenue up 17% to $974 million and a record $3.9 billion backlog, up 62% year-over-year.
- PWR delivered Q1 2026 revenue of $7.87 billion, up 26% year-over-year, with a record $48.5 billion backlog and raised full-year guidance.
- YTD returns stand at approximately 70% for IESC and 83% for PWR, with both significantly outperforming the S&P 500.
- PWR offers greater scale with $115 billion market cap versus IESC's $13 billion, but IESC trades at a lower trailing P/E ratio of 33 versus 104.
- Recent momentum shows both stocks up over 30% in the past month amid infrastructure demand, though IESC exhibits higher volatility with a beta of 1.81.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines IESC and PWR, two leaders in the industrials sector's engineering and construction industry. Both companies specialize in electrical systems and infrastructure solutions critical to data centers, utilities, and energy transition projects. Traders seeking momentum plays and investors focused on long-term growth in electrification and AI-driven demand will find this analysis relevant. Recent earnings beats, expanding backlogs, and robust sector tailwinds highlight their relative performance and market positioning in the current environment.
IESC Overview and Recent Performance
IESC, or IES Holdings, Inc., designs and installs integrated electrical and technology systems, serving data centers, residential, commercial, industrial, and infrastructure markets across the U.S. The company operates through segments like Communications, Residential, Infrastructure Solutions, and Commercial & Industrial.
In recent market activity, IESC has shown explosive gains, with shares trading around $661 and a 52-week range of $233.71 to $676.70. YTD return exceeds 70%, and one-year performance tops 174%, far outpacing benchmarks. Recent weeks saw over 30% appreciation, fueled by Q2 fiscal 2026 results: revenue rose 17% to $974 million, operating income increased 21%, and backlog hit a record $3.9 billion, up 62% year-over-year, driven by data center demand and capacity expansions. Remaining performance obligations stood at $2.3 billion, signaling strong future revenue visibility. Sentiment remains positive amid infrastructure growth, though higher beta (1.81) reflects volatility.
PWR Overview and Recent Performance
PWR, or Quanta Services, Inc., provides comprehensive infrastructure solutions for electric power, renewables, communications, pipelines, and utilities. Its Electric Infrastructure Solutions and Underground Utility segments support transmission, distribution, substations, and data center projects.
PWR shares recently traded near $772, with a 52-week range of $315 to $778 and market cap over $115 billion. YTD gains approximate 83%, with one-year returns around 139%. Over recent weeks, the stock surged more than 30%, propelled by Q1 2026 earnings: revenue climbed 26% to $7.87 billion, adjusted diluted EPS hit $2.68, and backlog reached a record $48.5 billion. Management raised full-year guidance to $34.7-$35.2 billion in revenue and $13.55-$14.25 adjusted EPS. Strong execution in data centers and utilities has boosted sentiment, supported by a lower beta of 1.24 indicating relative stability.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 performers from its library of 351 AI trading bots, each employing distinct strategies, timeframes, and ticker portfolios suited to prevailing market conditions. These bots deliver real-time signals for copy trading across sectors like industrials, semiconductors, and data centers, with annualized returns ranging from +23% to +169%, win rates of 51% to 88%, and portfolios covering 1 to 18 tickers. Unlike the full suite trading thousands of instruments, this section spotlights the most effective for current trends in volatility, growth, and infrastructure plays. Explore these tools to align automated strategies with opportunities in stocks like IESC and PWR.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both firms thrive on infrastructure demand, but IESC emphasizes electrical installations across diverse end-markets, while PWR offers broader utility and pipeline services with global scale. Growth drivers include data centers for both, though PWR's $48.5 billion backlog dwarfs IESC's $3.9 billion, providing superior visibility.
Recent momentum favors IESC on relative one-year returns (175% vs. 139%), but PWR edges YTD and boasts 8x the revenue scale ($30 billion TTM vs. $3.6 billion). Risk profiles differ: IESC's higher beta (1.81) signals volatility from residential exposure, versus PWR's steadier 1.24 amid diversified utilities. IESC appears more attractively valued at 33x trailing P/E versus 104x, trading at a premium for growth and stability.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward PWR due to its unmatched backlog scale, raised guidance amid sustained infrastructure catalysts, and lower volatility, positioning it for consistent execution. While IESC offers compelling momentum and valuation, PWR's relative stability and broader exposure yield higher probability of outperformance in trending markets.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IESC is a StrongBuy and PWR is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IESC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePWR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- IESC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- PWR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IESC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWR’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- IESC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PWR’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
IESC (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -4.64% price change this week, while PWR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -7.47% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -3.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.59%.
Reported Earning Dates
IESC is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
PWR is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (-3.40% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| IESC | PWR | IESC / PWR | |
| Capitalization | 12.7B | 107B | 12% |
| EBITDA | 537M | 2.71B | 20% |
| Gain YTD | 64.375 | 69.278 | 93% |
| P/E Ratio | 34.10 | 97.96 | 35% |
| Revenue | 3.63B | 30.1B | 12% |
| Total Cash | 263M | 365M | 72% |
| Total Debt | 107M | 6.32B | 2% |
IESC | PWR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 84 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 3 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 22 | 61 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 4 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | 12 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IESC's Valuation (82) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (92). This means that IESC’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as IESC (7). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to IESC’s over the last 12 months.
IESC's SMR Rating (22) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PWR (61). This means that IESC’s stock grew somewhat faster than PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Price Growth Rating (4) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as IESC (36). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to IESC’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as IESC (14). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to IESC’s over the last 12 months.
| IESC | PWR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 76% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| UPSX | 15.47 | 0.13 | +0.85% |
| Tradr 2X Long UPST Daily ETF | |||
| SMMV | 44.35 | -0.10 | -0.23% |
| iShares MSCI USA Sm-Cp Min Vol Fctr ETF | |||
| BBCB | 44.67 | -0.20 | -0.45% |
| JPMorgan BetaBuilders $ InvmGrdCorpBdETF | |||
| HFXI | 36.26 | -0.23 | -0.63% |
| NYLI FTSE International Eq Ccy Netrl ETF | |||
| FEGE | 49.54 | -0.31 | -0.63% |
| FIRST EAGLE GLOBAL EQUITY ETF | |||
IESC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IESC has been closely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IESC jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IESC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IESC | 100% | -2.27% | ||
| FIX - IESC | 73% Closely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| PWR - IESC | 67% Closely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| EME - IESC | 67% Closely correlated | -2.60% | ||
| MTZ - IESC | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| STRL - IESC | 64% Loosely correlated | -5.51% | ||
More | ||||
PWR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWR has been closely correlated with MYRG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWR jumps, then MYRG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PWR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PWR | 100% | -1.23% | ||
| MYRG - PWR | 79% Closely correlated | -2.07% | ||
| MTZ - PWR | 79% Closely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| FIX - PWR | 75% Closely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| IESC - PWR | 67% Closely correlated | -2.27% | ||
| EME - PWR | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.60% | ||
More | ||||