IESC
Price
$663.70
Change
-$10.50 (-1.56%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
13.22B
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MTZ
Price
$358.86
Change
+$1.51 (+0.42%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
28.36B
6 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IESC vs MTZ

IESC vs MTZ Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IESC vs. MTZ commentary
Jul 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IESC is a StrongBuy and MTZ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 24, 2026
Stock price -- (IESC: $663.70 vs. MTZ: $358.86)
Brand notoriety: IESC: Not notable vs. MTZ: Notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IESC: 30% vs. MTZ: 57%
Market capitalization -- IESC: $13.22B vs. MTZ: $28.36B
IESC [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $13.22B. MTZ’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $28.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $9.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IESC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMTZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IESC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MTZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IESC is a better buy in the long-term than MTZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IESC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTZ’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IESC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MTZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IESC is a better buy in the short-term than MTZ.

Price Growth

IESC (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +8.88% price change this week, while MTZ (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +5.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -0.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

IESC is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.

MTZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (-0.23% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTZ($28.4B) has a higher market cap than IESC($13.2B). MTZ has higher P/E ratio than IESC: MTZ (62.85) vs IESC (35.40). IESC YTD gains are higher at: 70.608 vs. MTZ (65.092). MTZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.22B vs. IESC (537M). MTZ (274M) and IESC (263M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . IESC has less debt than MTZ: IESC (107M) vs MTZ (3.02B). MTZ has higher revenues than IESC: MTZ (15.3B) vs IESC (3.63B).
IESCMTZIESC / MTZ
Capitalization13.2B28.4B46%
EBITDA537M1.22B44%
Gain YTD70.60865.092108%
P/E Ratio35.4062.8556%
Revenue3.63B15.3B24%
Total Cash263M274M96%
Total Debt107M3.02B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IESC vs MTZ: Fundamental Ratings
IESC
MTZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2461
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
618
SMR RATING
1..100
2360
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3942
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2454
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IESC's Valuation (83) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (84). This means that IESC’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.

IESC's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (18). This means that IESC’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.

IESC's SMR Rating (23) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTZ (60). This means that IESC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTZ’s over the last 12 months.

IESC's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (42). This means that IESC’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.

IESC's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (54). This means that IESC’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IESCMTZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IESC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MTZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WXM3.720.22
+6.29%
WF International Limited
JBL322.043.75
+1.18%
Jabil
GSBC78.330.54
+0.69%
Great Southern Bancorp
GPGI14.07-0.19
-1.33%
GPGI Inc.
APYX3.83-0.08
-2.05%
Apyx Medical Corp

IESC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IESC has been closely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IESC jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IESC
1D Price
Change %
IESC100%
-1.56%
FIX - IESC
74%
Closely correlated
+2.24%
STRL - IESC
67%
Closely correlated
-0.28%
MTZ - IESC
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
MYRG - IESC
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
ECG - IESC
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
More

MTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTZ has been closely correlated with PWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTZ jumps, then PWR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTZ
1D Price
Change %
MTZ100%
+0.42%
PWR - MTZ
80%
Closely correlated
+1.66%
MYRG - MTZ
75%
Closely correlated
-0.41%
FIX - MTZ
75%
Closely correlated
+2.24%
ECG - MTZ
66%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
IESC - MTZ
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.56%
More