This stock comparison examines IESC and MTZ, two leaders in infrastructure construction benefiting from data center expansion, clean energy transitions, and grid modernization. Both have delivered outsized gains in recent market activity, with year-to-date returns exceeding 60% for IESC and over 90% for MTZ. Traders seeking momentum in industrials and investors eyeing long-term infrastructure growth will find value in analyzing their relative performance, backlog visibility, and sector positioning. This overview draws on recent earnings and market data for a balanced view.
IESC, or IES Holdings, Inc., designs and installs integrated electrical and technology systems for data centers, commercial, industrial, and residential markets across the U.S. In recent weeks, the stock has traded near 52-week highs around $661, reflecting robust demand in infrastructure. Fiscal Q2 2026 results showed revenue up 17% to $974 million and operating income rising 21%, with net income increasing 56%. Backlog hit a record $3.9 billion, up 62% since fiscal year-end, fueled by Communications and Infrastructure Solutions segments amid data center projects. Remaining performance obligations stood at $2.3 billion. Sentiment has strengthened on earnings beats and acquisition of Gulf Island Fabrication, though Residential faced housing slowdowns. Year-to-date, shares are up over 65%, with a beta of 1.81 indicating higher volatility tied to market swings.
MTZ, MasTec, Inc., is an infrastructure engineering and construction firm serving communications, clean energy, power delivery, and pipelines primarily in the U.S. and Canada. Recent market activity has propelled shares to around $437, with strong gains post-earnings. Q1 2026 marked records: revenue surged 34% to $3.83 billion, adjusted EBITDA rose 73% to $284 million, and adjusted EPS hit $1.39. The 18-month backlog reached $20.3 billion, up 28% year-over-year, led by 65% growth in Clean Energy and Infrastructure. Management raised full-year 2026 guidance to $17.5 billion revenue (22% growth) and $8.79 adjusted EPS. All segments grew double-digits, with Pipeline up 92%. Positive sentiment stems from backlog visibility and sector demand, though execution risks persist. Year-to-date returns top 100%.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots selected from 351 total, curated for their suitability in current market conditions like volatility in industrials and tech. These bots employ diverse strategies—technical and fundamental analysis via Signal, Virtual, and Brokerage Agents—with timeframes from 60 minutes to 48 days, win rates spanning 51% to 88%, annualized returns up to 169%, and profit factors to 11.70. They trade individual stocks, ETFs, and groups (3-18 tickers) in high-momentum areas like semiconductors (NVDA), data centers, and industrials akin to IESC and MTZ. Profit-to-drawdown ratios reach 17.59, appealing to varied risk profiles. Explore these bots to align automated strategies with stocks showing strong relative performance.
IESC and MTZ operate in overlapping infrastructure niches but differ in scale and diversification. IESC’s model emphasizes electrical installations for data centers and tech systems, yielding focused growth (20%+ five-year revenue CAGR) but exposure to residential softness. MTZ spans broader segments like pipelines and renewables, supporting larger backlog but potentially higher execution complexity with 36,000 employees.
Growth drivers contrast: IESC leverages data center catalysts and acquisitions; MTZ benefits from clean energy and grid upgrades. Recent momentum favors both, but MTZ’s 200%+ one-year return edges IESC’s 170%. Risk factors include labor shortages and commodity costs for both; IESC’s higher beta (1.81) signals greater volatility versus MTZ’s scale. Sector exposure tilts MTZ toward energy diversity, while market sentiment aligns on infrastructure tailwinds, with IESC showing tighter trend consistency per AI metrics.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors IESC over MTZ, based on superior trend consistency, earnings acceleration, and data center catalysts positioning it for probabilistic outperformance. While MTZ’s massive backlog and raised guidance provide stability, IESC’s relative momentum and focused execution suggest higher near-term upside potential in current market conditions.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IESC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMTZ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IESC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTZ’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
IESC (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -4.64% price change this week, while MTZ (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -8.49% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -3.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.59%.
IESC is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
MTZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| IESC | MTZ | IESC / MTZ | |
| Capitalization | 12.7B | 30.4B | 42% |
| EBITDA | 537M | 1.22B | 44% |
| Gain YTD | 64.375 | 77.117 | 83% |
| P/E Ratio | 34.10 | 67.43 | 51% |
| Revenue | 3.63B | 15.3B | 24% |
| Total Cash | 263M | 274M | 96% |
| Total Debt | 107M | 3.02B | 4% |
IESC | MTZ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 82 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 7 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 22 | 58 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | 30 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IESC's Valuation (82) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (90). This means that IESC’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
IESC's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (7). This means that IESC’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
IESC's SMR Rating (22) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTZ (58). This means that IESC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
IESC's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (36). This means that IESC’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
IESC's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (30). This means that IESC’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
| IESC | MTZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 83% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IESC has been closely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IESC jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IESC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IESC | 100% | -2.27% | ||
| FIX - IESC | 73% Closely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| PWR - IESC | 67% Closely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| EME - IESC | 67% Closely correlated | -2.60% | ||
| MTZ - IESC | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| STRL - IESC | 64% Loosely correlated | -5.51% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTZ has been closely correlated with PWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTZ jumps, then PWR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTZ | 100% | -0.15% | ||
| PWR - MTZ | 79% Closely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| MYRG - MTZ | 74% Closely correlated | -2.07% | ||
| FIX - MTZ | 73% Closely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| IESC - MTZ | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.27% | ||
| DY - MTZ | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.50% | ||
More | ||||