IESC
Price
$639.45
Change
-$14.83 (-2.27%)
Updated
May 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.74B
73 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MTZ
Price
$384.68
Change
-$0.90 (-0.23%)
Updated
May 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
30.42B
72 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IESC vs MTZ

Header iconIESC vs MTZ Comparison
Open Charts IESC vs MTZBanner chart's image
IESC vs MTZ Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? IES Holdings (IESC) vs. MasTec (MTZ) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • IESC delivered Q2 fiscal 2026 revenue growth of 17% to $974 million with a record $3.9 billion backlog, up 62% year-over-year, driven by data centers and infrastructure.
  • MTZ reported record Q1 2026 revenue up 34% to $3.83 billion, raised full-year guidance to $17.5 billion, and hit an all-time high 18-month backlog of $20.3 billion.
  • Both stocks have shown exceptional recent momentum, with IESC up over 170% in the past year and MTZ up more than 200%, far outpacing the S&P 500.
  • IESC focuses on electrical systems for data centers and commercial projects, while MTZ offers broader infrastructure exposure across communications, energy, and pipelines.
  • Recent market activity highlights strong sector tailwinds in infrastructure and clean energy, boosting sentiment for both in relative performance comparisons.
  • Tickeron’s AI analysis favors IESC for superior trend consistency amid data center demand.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines IESC and MTZ, two leaders in infrastructure construction benefiting from data center expansion, clean energy transitions, and grid modernization. Both have delivered outsized gains in recent market activity, with year-to-date returns exceeding 60% for IESC and over 90% for MTZ. Traders seeking momentum in industrials and investors eyeing long-term infrastructure growth will find value in analyzing their relative performance, backlog visibility, and sector positioning. This overview draws on recent earnings and market data for a balanced view.

IESC Overview and Recent Performance

IESC, or IES Holdings, Inc., designs and installs integrated electrical and technology systems for data centers, commercial, industrial, and residential markets across the U.S. In recent weeks, the stock has traded near 52-week highs around $661, reflecting robust demand in infrastructure. Fiscal Q2 2026 results showed revenue up 17% to $974 million and operating income rising 21%, with net income increasing 56%. Backlog hit a record $3.9 billion, up 62% since fiscal year-end, fueled by Communications and Infrastructure Solutions segments amid data center projects. Remaining performance obligations stood at $2.3 billion. Sentiment has strengthened on earnings beats and acquisition of Gulf Island Fabrication, though Residential faced housing slowdowns. Year-to-date, shares are up over 65%, with a beta of 1.81 indicating higher volatility tied to market swings.

MTZ Overview and Recent Performance

MTZ, MasTec, Inc., is an infrastructure engineering and construction firm serving communications, clean energy, power delivery, and pipelines primarily in the U.S. and Canada. Recent market activity has propelled shares to around $437, with strong gains post-earnings. Q1 2026 marked records: revenue surged 34% to $3.83 billion, adjusted EBITDA rose 73% to $284 million, and adjusted EPS hit $1.39. The 18-month backlog reached $20.3 billion, up 28% year-over-year, led by 65% growth in Clean Energy and Infrastructure. Management raised full-year 2026 guidance to $17.5 billion revenue (22% growth) and $8.79 adjusted EPS. All segments grew double-digits, with Pipeline up 92%. Positive sentiment stems from backlog visibility and sector demand, though execution risks persist. Year-to-date returns top 100%.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots selected from 351 total, curated for their suitability in current market conditions like volatility in industrials and tech. These bots employ diverse strategies—technical and fundamental analysis via Signal, Virtual, and Brokerage Agents—with timeframes from 60 minutes to 48 days, win rates spanning 51% to 88%, annualized returns up to 169%, and profit factors to 11.70. They trade individual stocks, ETFs, and groups (3-18 tickers) in high-momentum areas like semiconductors (NVDA), data centers, and industrials akin to IESC and MTZ. Profit-to-drawdown ratios reach 17.59, appealing to varied risk profiles. Explore these bots to align automated strategies with stocks showing strong relative performance.

Head-to-Head Comparison

IESC and MTZ operate in overlapping infrastructure niches but differ in scale and diversification. IESC’s model emphasizes electrical installations for data centers and tech systems, yielding focused growth (20%+ five-year revenue CAGR) but exposure to residential softness. MTZ spans broader segments like pipelines and renewables, supporting larger backlog but potentially higher execution complexity with 36,000 employees.

Growth drivers contrast: IESC leverages data center catalysts and acquisitions; MTZ benefits from clean energy and grid upgrades. Recent momentum favors both, but MTZ’s 200%+ one-year return edges IESC’s 170%. Risk factors include labor shortages and commodity costs for both; IESC’s higher beta (1.81) signals greater volatility versus MTZ’s scale. Sector exposure tilts MTZ toward energy diversity, while market sentiment aligns on infrastructure tailwinds, with IESC showing tighter trend consistency per AI metrics.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors IESC over MTZ, based on superior trend consistency, earnings acceleration, and data center catalysts positioning it for probabilistic outperformance. While MTZ’s massive backlog and raised guidance provide stability, IESC’s relative momentum and focused execution suggest higher near-term upside potential in current market conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

VS
IESC vs. MTZ commentary
May 20, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IESC is a StrongBuy and MTZ is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 20, 2026
Stock price -- (IESC: $653.35 vs. MTZ: $385.58)
Brand notoriety: IESC: Not notable vs. MTZ: Notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IESC: 79% vs. MTZ: 160%
Market capitalization -- IESC: $12.74B vs. MTZ: $30.42B
IESC [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $12.74B. MTZ’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $30.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $10.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IESC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMTZ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • IESC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MTZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, IESC is a better buy in the long-term than MTZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IESC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTZ’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IESC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MTZ’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IESC is a better buy in the short-term than MTZ.

Price Growth

IESC (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -4.64% price change this week, while MTZ (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -8.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -3.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.59%.

Reported Earning Dates

IESC is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.

MTZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (-3.40% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTZ($30.4B) has a higher market cap than IESC($12.7B). MTZ has higher P/E ratio than IESC: MTZ (67.43) vs IESC (34.10). MTZ YTD gains are higher at: 77.117 vs. IESC (64.375). MTZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.22B vs. IESC (537M). MTZ (274M) and IESC (263M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . IESC has less debt than MTZ: IESC (107M) vs MTZ (3.02B). MTZ has higher revenues than IESC: MTZ (15.3B) vs IESC (3.63B).
IESCMTZIESC / MTZ
Capitalization12.7B30.4B42%
EBITDA537M1.22B44%
Gain YTD64.37577.11783%
P/E Ratio34.1067.4351%
Revenue3.63B15.3B24%
Total Cash263M274M96%
Total Debt107M3.02B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IESC vs MTZ: Fundamental Ratings
IESC
MTZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2282
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
77
SMR RATING
1..100
2258
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3636
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1430
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IESC's Valuation (82) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (90). This means that IESC’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.

IESC's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (7). This means that IESC’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.

IESC's SMR Rating (22) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTZ (58). This means that IESC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTZ’s over the last 12 months.

IESC's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (36). This means that IESC’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.

IESC's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (30). This means that IESC’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IESCMTZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IESC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MTZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EMLP44.350.35
+0.80%
First Trust North Amer Engy InfrasETF
GMOV29.60-0.10
-0.33%
GMO US Value ETF
VEGA51.26-0.31
-0.60%
AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF
SNTH29.54-0.25
-0.83%
MRP Synthequity ETF
EEMS74.48-1.27
-1.67%
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Sm-Cp ETF

IESC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IESC has been closely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IESC jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IESC
1D Price
Change %
IESC100%
-2.27%
FIX - IESC
73%
Closely correlated
-1.56%
PWR - IESC
67%
Closely correlated
-1.23%
EME - IESC
67%
Closely correlated
-2.60%
MTZ - IESC
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
STRL - IESC
64%
Loosely correlated
-5.51%
More

MTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTZ has been closely correlated with PWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTZ jumps, then PWR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTZ
1D Price
Change %
MTZ100%
-0.15%
PWR - MTZ
79%
Closely correlated
-1.23%
MYRG - MTZ
74%
Closely correlated
-2.07%
FIX - MTZ
73%
Closely correlated
-1.56%
IESC - MTZ
66%
Loosely correlated
-2.27%
DY - MTZ
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.50%
More