EME
Price
$823.05
Change
+$11.52 (+1.42%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
36.58B
39 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IESC
Price
$749.83
Change
+$18.50 (+2.53%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
14.94B
47 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EME vs IESC

Header iconEME vs IESC Comparison
Open Charts EME vs IESCBanner chart's image
EME vs IESC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? EMCOR Group (EME) vs. IES Holdings (IESC) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both EME and IESC operate in the engineering and construction sector, focusing on electrical and mechanical systems, with strong recent momentum driven by data center and infrastructure demand.
  • EME reported record Q1 2026 revenue of $4.63 billion (up 19.7% YoY) and raised full-year guidance, while IESC posted Q2 FY2026 revenue growth of 17% to $974 million with a 56% net income surge.
  • YTD returns stand at approximately 53% for EME and 70% for IESC, with 1-year gains of 114% and 175%, respectively.
  • EME has a larger market cap (~$41B) and revenue base ($17.75B TTM), offering scale, while IESC (~$13B cap, $3.63B TTM revenue) shows higher growth velocity and backlog expansion (62% to $3.9B).
  • Recent sentiment favors both amid sector tailwinds, but IESC's beta (1.81) indicates greater volatility compared to EME (1.17).
  • AI analysis highlights relative strength in trend consistency for high-growth plays like these in industrials.

Introduction

EMCOR Group (EME) and IES Holdings (IESC) are key players in the engineering and construction sector, specializing in electrical, mechanical, and technology systems for commercial, industrial, and infrastructure projects. This stock comparison is particularly relevant for traders eyeing industrials amid booming demand for data centers, residential housing, and energy infrastructure. Investors seeking exposure to relative performance in a market favoring construction growth—driven by recent earnings beats and backlog expansions—will find insights into momentum, valuation trade-offs, and sector positioning. Both stocks have significantly outperformed the S&P 500 in recent market activity, underscoring their appeal in current conditions.

EME Overview and Recent Performance

EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) is a leading specialty contractor providing electrical and mechanical construction, along with facilities and industrial services across the U.S. and U.K. With approximately 44,000 employees and a market cap near $41 billion, the company reported record Q1 2026 revenue of $4.63 billion, up 19.7% year-over-year, and diluted EPS of $6.84, surpassing estimates. Remaining performance obligations (RPO, a measure of future revenue under contract) hit a record $15.62 billion, up 32.9%. Recent weeks have seen shares rise over 20% from recent lows, fueled by raised full-year guidance ($18.50–$19.25 billion revenue, $28.25–$29.75 EPS) and strong sector demand, particularly in data centers and mechanical services. Sentiment remains positive, supported by consistent beats and a beta of 1.17 indicating moderate volatility relative to the market.

IESC Overview and Recent Performance

IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) designs and installs integrated electrical and technology systems, serving data centers, residential, commercial, and industrial markets across the U.S. Employing over 10,000 people with a market cap around $13 billion, it delivered Q2 FY2026 revenue of $974 million (up 17% YoY), operating income up 21% to $112.3 million, and net income surging 56% to $109.9 million (diluted EPS $5.44). Backlog expanded 62% to $3.9 billion, driven by communications (up 35%) and infrastructure solutions (up 64%), though residential dipped amid housing softness. Shares have gained over 30% in recent weeks, reflecting robust data center demand and acquisition contributions like Gulf Island Fabrication. A beta of 1.81 signals higher sensitivity to market swings, but strong profitability (10.4% net margin) bolsters sentiment.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics. Only the most suitable for prevailing market conditions—such as momentum in industrials and tech infrastructure—earn a spot in this dynamic section. Stats highlight elite performers: annualized returns up to +227%, win rates of 70–80%, and profit factors reaching 2.5–3.0+ in sectors like energy, semiconductors, and technology. These bots employ varied approaches, from short-term trend-following (15–5 minute intervals) to sector rotation, delivering results like +64% annualized in aerospace ETFs or +112% in AI stocks. Explore these tools to align automated strategies with current opportunities in stocks like EME and IESC, and consider testing via Tickeron’s brokerage for real-time insights.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Both EME and IESC thrive in electrical/mechanical construction, but EME’s diversified model spans broader facilities services with $17.75B TTM revenue versus IESC’s $3.63B focus on tech-integrated systems. Growth drivers differ: IESC leverages data centers (62% backlog growth) and acquisitions for 17% quarterly revenue gains, while EME benefits from mechanical scale and 19.7% Q1 growth. Recent momentum favors IESC (YTD +70%, 1Y +175%) over EME (+53%, +114%), though EME’s stability shines with lower beta (1.17 vs. 1.81). Risk factors include IESC’s residential exposure amid housing slowdowns and higher volatility, contrasted by EME’s international reach. Sector tailwinds like infrastructure boost both, but IESC’s nimbler positioning drives superior sentiment in high-growth niches.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors IESC for its superior recent momentum, explosive backlog growth, and alignment with data center catalysts—key in trending AI robot strategies for industrials. While EME offers scale and trend consistency, IESC’s relative positioning suggests higher probabilistic upside in the near term, albeit with elevated volatility.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

VS
EME vs. IESC commentary
Jun 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EME is a StrongBuy and IESC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 14, 2026
Stock price -- (EME: $823.05 vs. IESC: $749.83)
Brand notoriety: EME and IESC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EME: 69% vs. IESC: 102%
Market capitalization -- EME: $36.58B vs. IESC: $14.94B
EME [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $36.58B. IESC’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $14.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $10.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EME’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileIESC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • EME’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • IESC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, EME is a better buy in the long-term than IESC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EME’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IESC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EME’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • IESC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EME is a better buy in the short-term than IESC.

Price Growth

EME (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +0.69% price change this week, while IESC (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +4.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +1.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

EME is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

IESC is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+1.83% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EME($36.6B) has a higher market cap than IESC($14.9B). IESC has higher P/E ratio than EME: IESC (39.99) vs EME (27.65). IESC YTD gains are higher at: 92.748 vs. EME (34.679). EME has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.02B vs. IESC (537M). EME has more cash in the bank: 916M vs. IESC (263M). IESC has less debt than EME: IESC (107M) vs EME (510M). EME has higher revenues than IESC: EME (17.7B) vs IESC (3.63B).
EMEIESCEME / IESC
Capitalization36.6B14.9B246%
EBITDA2.02B537M375%
Gain YTD34.67992.74837%
P/E Ratio27.6539.9969%
Revenue17.7B3.63B487%
Total Cash916M263M348%
Total Debt510M107M477%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EME vs IESC: Fundamental Ratings
EME
IESC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6368
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
74
SMR RATING
1..100
2423
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4436
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2713
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EME's Valuation (59) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as IESC (82). This means that EME’s stock grew similarly to IESC’s over the last 12 months.

IESC's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as EME (7). This means that IESC’s stock grew similarly to EME’s over the last 12 months.

IESC's SMR Rating (23) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as EME (24). This means that IESC’s stock grew similarly to EME’s over the last 12 months.

IESC's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as EME (44). This means that IESC’s stock grew similarly to EME’s over the last 12 months.

IESC's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as EME (27). This means that IESC’s stock grew similarly to EME’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMEIESC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EME
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IESC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PTEN11.49N/A
N/A
Patterson-UTI Energy
ELME2.03-0.01
-0.49%
Elme Communities
BDX146.24-1.11
-0.75%
Becton Dickinson and Co
KOPN4.94-0.19
-3.70%
Kopin Corp
OSRH0.38-0.04
-9.11%
OSR Holdings Inc.

EME and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EME has been closely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EME jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EME
1D Price
Change %
EME100%
+1.42%
FIX - EME
79%
Closely correlated
+1.85%
MYRG - EME
68%
Closely correlated
+4.86%
IESC - EME
68%
Closely correlated
+2.53%
PWR - EME
67%
Closely correlated
+3.58%
MTZ - EME
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.25%
More