EMCOR Group (EME) and IES Holdings (IESC) are key players in the engineering and construction sector, specializing in electrical, mechanical, and technology systems for commercial, industrial, and infrastructure projects. This stock comparison is particularly relevant for traders eyeing industrials amid booming demand for data centers, residential housing, and energy infrastructure. Investors seeking exposure to relative performance in a market favoring construction growth—driven by recent earnings beats and backlog expansions—will find insights into momentum, valuation trade-offs, and sector positioning. Both stocks have significantly outperformed the S&P 500 in recent market activity, underscoring their appeal in current conditions.
EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) is a leading specialty contractor providing electrical and mechanical construction, along with facilities and industrial services across the U.S. and U.K. With approximately 44,000 employees and a market cap near $41 billion, the company reported record Q1 2026 revenue of $4.63 billion, up 19.7% year-over-year, and diluted EPS of $6.84, surpassing estimates. Remaining performance obligations (RPO, a measure of future revenue under contract) hit a record $15.62 billion, up 32.9%. Recent weeks have seen shares rise over 20% from recent lows, fueled by raised full-year guidance ($18.50–$19.25 billion revenue, $28.25–$29.75 EPS) and strong sector demand, particularly in data centers and mechanical services. Sentiment remains positive, supported by consistent beats and a beta of 1.17 indicating moderate volatility relative to the market.
IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) designs and installs integrated electrical and technology systems, serving data centers, residential, commercial, and industrial markets across the U.S. Employing over 10,000 people with a market cap around $13 billion, it delivered Q2 FY2026 revenue of $974 million (up 17% YoY), operating income up 21% to $112.3 million, and net income surging 56% to $109.9 million (diluted EPS $5.44). Backlog expanded 62% to $3.9 billion, driven by communications (up 35%) and infrastructure solutions (up 64%), though residential dipped amid housing softness. Shares have gained over 30% in recent weeks, reflecting robust data center demand and acquisition contributions like Gulf Island Fabrication. A beta of 1.81 signals higher sensitivity to market swings, but strong profitability (10.4% net margin) bolsters sentiment.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics. Only the most suitable for prevailing market conditions—such as momentum in industrials and tech infrastructure—earn a spot in this dynamic section. Stats highlight elite performers: annualized returns up to +227%, win rates of 70–80%, and profit factors reaching 2.5–3.0+ in sectors like energy, semiconductors, and technology. These bots employ varied approaches, from short-term trend-following (15–5 minute intervals) to sector rotation, delivering results like +64% annualized in aerospace ETFs or +112% in AI stocks. Explore these tools to align automated strategies with current opportunities in stocks like EME and IESC, and consider testing via Tickeron’s brokerage for real-time insights.
Both EME and IESC thrive in electrical/mechanical construction, but EME’s diversified model spans broader facilities services with $17.75B TTM revenue versus IESC’s $3.63B focus on tech-integrated systems. Growth drivers differ: IESC leverages data centers (62% backlog growth) and acquisitions for 17% quarterly revenue gains, while EME benefits from mechanical scale and 19.7% Q1 growth. Recent momentum favors IESC (YTD +70%, 1Y +175%) over EME (+53%, +114%), though EME’s stability shines with lower beta (1.17 vs. 1.81). Risk factors include IESC’s residential exposure amid housing slowdowns and higher volatility, contrasted by EME’s international reach. Sector tailwinds like infrastructure boost both, but IESC’s nimbler positioning drives superior sentiment in high-growth niches.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors IESC for its superior recent momentum, explosive backlog growth, and alignment with data center catalysts—key in trending AI robot strategies for industrials. While EME offers scale and trend consistency, IESC’s relative positioning suggests higher probabilistic upside in the near term, albeit with elevated volatility.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EME’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileIESC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EME’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IESC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
EME (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +0.69% price change this week, while IESC (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +4.04% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +1.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.72%.
EME is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
IESC is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| EME | IESC | EME / IESC | |
| Capitalization | 36.6B | 14.9B | 246% |
| EBITDA | 2.02B | 537M | 375% |
| Gain YTD | 34.679 | 92.748 | 37% |
| P/E Ratio | 27.65 | 39.99 | 69% |
| Revenue | 17.7B | 3.63B | 487% |
| Total Cash | 916M | 263M | 348% |
| Total Debt | 510M | 107M | 477% |
EME | IESC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 68 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 4 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 24 | 23 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 27 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EME's Valuation (59) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as IESC (82). This means that EME’s stock grew similarly to IESC’s over the last 12 months.
IESC's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as EME (7). This means that IESC’s stock grew similarly to EME’s over the last 12 months.
IESC's SMR Rating (23) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as EME (24). This means that IESC’s stock grew similarly to EME’s over the last 12 months.
IESC's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as EME (44). This means that IESC’s stock grew similarly to EME’s over the last 12 months.
IESC's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as EME (27). This means that IESC’s stock grew similarly to EME’s over the last 12 months.
| EME | IESC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 46% | 4 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 88% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EME has been closely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EME jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EME | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EME | 100% | +1.42% | ||
| FIX - EME | 79% Closely correlated | +1.85% | ||
| MYRG - EME | 68% Closely correlated | +4.86% | ||
| IESC - EME | 68% Closely correlated | +2.53% | ||
| PWR - EME | 67% Closely correlated | +3.58% | ||
| MTZ - EME | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.25% | ||
More | ||||