GWLLF
Price
$1.56
Change
-$0.09 (-5.45%)
Updated
Jan 23 closing price
Capitalization
28.8B
LI
Price
$23.21
Change
+$0.42 (+1.84%)
Updated
Jan 24 closing price
Capitalization
31.07B
25 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GWLLF vs LI

Header iconGWLLF vs LI Comparison
Open Charts GWLLF vs LIBanner chart's image
Great Wall Motor
Price$1.56
Change-$0.09 (-5.45%)
Volume$200
Capitalization28.8B
Li Auto
Price$23.21
Change+$0.42 (+1.84%)
Volume$3.23M
Capitalization31.07B
GWLLF vs LI Comparison Chart
Loading...
GWLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GWLLF vs. LI commentary
Jan 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GWLLF is a Hold and LI is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 27, 2025
Stock price -- (GWLLF: $1.56 vs. LI: $23.21)
Brand notoriety: GWLLF and LI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GWLLF: 3% vs. LI: 68%
Market capitalization -- GWLLF: $28.8B vs. LI: $31.07B
GWLLF [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $28.8B. LI’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $31.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $559.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $33.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GWLLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GWLLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GWLLF is a better buy in the long-term than LI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GWLLF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GWLLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LI is a better buy in the short-term than GWLLF.

Price Growth

GWLLF (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а -5.74% price change this week, while LI (@Motor Vehicles) price change was +2.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -2.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

LI is expected to report earnings on May 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (-2.60% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LI($31.1B) has a higher market cap than GWLLF($28.8B). LI has higher P/E ratio than GWLLF: LI (19.64) vs GWLLF (12.71). LI YTD gains are higher at: -3.251 vs. GWLLF (-12.113). GWLLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.79B vs. LI (3.51B). LI has more cash in the bank: 87.4B vs. GWLLF (26.7B). LI has less debt than GWLLF: LI (11.5B) vs GWLLF (29.3B). GWLLF has higher revenues than LI: GWLLF (133B) vs LI (74.4B).
GWLLFLIGWLLF / LI
Capitalization28.8B31.1B93%
EBITDA7.79B3.51B222%
Gain YTD-12.113-3.251373%
P/E Ratio12.7119.6465%
Revenue133B74.4B179%
Total Cash26.7B87.4B31%
Total Debt29.3B11.5B255%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GWLLF: Fundamental Ratings
GWLLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
74
SMR RATING
1..100
18
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
82
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GWLLFLI
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GWLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AEDYX32.850.13
+0.40%
Invesco EQV European Equity Y
ABCYX21.32N/A
N/A
American Beacon The London Co Inc Eq Y
FFAFX78.55-0.12
-0.15%
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
ISIPX20.20-0.06
-0.30%
Voya US Stock Index Port S2
ETAEX14.07-0.07
-0.50%
Eventide Exponential Technologies A

GWLLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GWLLF and XPNGF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GWLLF and XPNGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GWLLF
1D Price
Change %
GWLLF100%
N/A
XPNGF - GWLLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
XPEV - GWLLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.09%
LI - GWLLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.84%
FUJHF - GWLLF
16%
Poorly correlated
-3.56%
GNZUF - GWLLF
7%
Poorly correlated
+11.64%
More

LI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LI has been loosely correlated with BYDDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LI jumps, then BYDDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LI
1D Price
Change %
LI100%
+1.84%
BYDDF - LI
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.25%
XPEV - LI
58%
Loosely correlated
+3.09%
BYDDY - LI
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.29%
NIO - LI
51%
Loosely correlated
+3.87%
GELYY - LI
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.81%
More