GXC
Price
$91.46
Change
+$0.42 (+0.46%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
478.22M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KWEB
Price
$26.38
Change
-$0.28 (-1.05%)
Updated
Aug 24, 11:45 AM (EDT)
Net Assets
5.3B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GXC vs KWEB

GXC vs KWEB Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? State Street SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) vs. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB)

Key Takeaways

  • GXC provides broad exposure to the Chinese equity market through a market-capitalization-weighted index covering multiple sectors, while KWEB delivers targeted exposure to China-based internet and internet-related technology companies.
  • GXC maintains significantly greater diversification with over 1,000 holdings compared to KWEB’s concentrated portfolio of approximately 40 holdings.
  • Both ETFs are passively managed index trackers, but GXC carries a lower expense ratio of 0.59% versus KWEB’s 0.69%.
  • Sector allocations differ markedly: GXC spreads weight across consumer cyclical, financial services, and communication services, whereas KWEB concentrates in communication services and consumer cyclical sectors driven by internet platforms.
  • Top holdings overlap on names such as TCEHY and Alibaba, yet KWEB’s focus amplifies exposure to e-commerce and online services leaders like PDD Holdings and Meituan.
  • Structural differences position GXC as a core broad-China allocation and KWEB as a thematic satellite holding within investor portfolios seeking internet-sector growth.

Introduction

Investors evaluating Chinese equity exposure often compare broad-market and sector-specific vehicles. The State Street SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) and the KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) both track passively managed indices tied to China but pursue distinct objectives. GXC offers comprehensive market representation, while KWEB isolates internet and technology themes. These complementary profiles make the pair relevant for investors constructing diversified China allocations amid evolving regulatory and macroeconomic conditions.

State Street SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) Overview

GXC tracks the S&P China BMI Index, a market-capitalization-weighted benchmark designed to measure the performance of investable Chinese equities across large-, mid-, and small-capitalization segments. The ETF holds more than 1,000 securities, providing wide diversification. Top holdings typically include Tencent Holdings, Alibaba Group, and other large-cap names, though no single position exceeds 10%. Sector weights feature consumer cyclical, financial services, communication services, and technology. The fund maintains a gross expense ratio of 0.59% and follows a rules-based passive strategy with periodic index rebalancing. Its structure supports broad beta exposure to China’s equity market without thematic concentration.

KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) Overview

KWEB seeks to track the CSI Overseas China Internet Index, which comprises China-based companies whose primary businesses center on internet and internet-related technology. The ETF typically holds around 40 securities, resulting in higher concentration. Leading positions often include Tencent Holdings, Alibaba Group, PDD Holdings, and Meituan, with the top 10 holdings representing more than 60% of assets. Sector exposure tilts heavily toward communication services and consumer cyclical categories. KWEB carries an expense ratio of 0.69% and employs a passive indexing approach with rebalancing aligned to its underlying index methodology. The fund’s thematic mandate distinguishes it as a targeted vehicle for internet-sector growth within China.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within China’s equity market, influenced by regulatory oversight of technology platforms, shifts in consumer spending patterns, and broader macroeconomic factors such as interest-rate expectations and cross-border capital flows. Recent policy developments affecting data security, antitrust measures, and platform economics have shaped the operating environment for internet companies. Broader economic indicators, including retail sales and technology investment trends, continue to drive sector sentiment. These dynamics affect GXC through its diversified holdings and exert amplified influence on KWEB due to its concentrated internet focus.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, GXC has delivered exposure aligned with the overall Chinese equity market, exhibiting volatility consistent with broad emerging-market benchmarks. KWEB has demonstrated greater sensitivity to internet-sector earnings reports and regulatory announcements, resulting in periods of elevated relative volatility. During rotations favoring consumer and technology themes, KWEB has shown stronger responsiveness, while GXC has provided steadier participation across financials and industrials. Relative positioning reflects GXC’s role as a diversified core holding versus KWEB’s function as a higher-beta thematic satellite within portfolios.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to refine your ETF and equity research process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including broader diversification, lower expense ratio, and balanced sector exposure across market cycles, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic preference to GXC for investors seeking core China equity allocation. KWEB remains compelling for those prioritizing concentrated internet-sector momentum, though its higher cost and narrower focus introduce elevated specific risk.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GXC vs. KWEB commentary
Aug 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GXC is a Hold and KWEB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KWEB has more net assets: 5.3B vs. GXC (478M). GXC has a higher annual dividend yield than KWEB: GXC (-4.825) vs KWEB (-21.703). GXC was incepted earlier than KWEB: GXC (19 years) vs KWEB (13 years). GXC (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than KWEB (0.70). KWEB has a higher turnover GXC (13.00) vs GXC (13.00).
GXCKWEBGXC / KWEB
Gain YTD-4.825-21.70322%
Net Assets478M5.3B9%
Total Expense Ratio0.590.7084%
Turnover13.0045.0029%
Yield2.197.4329%
Fund Existence19 years13 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GXCKWEB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GXC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KWEB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CAML40.470.26
+0.65%
Congress Large Cap Growth ETF
ETG23.990.11
+0.46%
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Income Fund
HYBX29.650.01
+0.05%
TCW High Yield Bond ETF
EMP19.79-0.01
-0.05%
Entergy Mississippi LLC
LVIG98.10-0.11
-0.11%
Longview Advantage Fixed Income ETF

GXC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GXC has been closely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GXC jumps, then JD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GXC
1D Price
Change %
GXC100%
+0.46%
JD - GXC
80%
Closely correlated
-0.14%
BILI - GXC
80%
Closely correlated
+2.40%
BABA - GXC
78%
Closely correlated
-8.57%
BIDU - GXC
74%
Closely correlated
+1.35%
BZUN - GXC
70%
Closely correlated
+1.43%
More