Advertisement
HBCP vs SFST
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBCP is a Hold and SFST is a Hold.
| HBCP | SFST | HBCP / SFST | |
| Capitalization | 540M | 585M | 92% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.399 | 19.973 | 102% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.47 | 13.29 | 86% |
| Revenue | 154M | 133M | 116% |
| Total Cash | 96.9M | 13.9M | 697% |
| Total Debt | 54.8M | 253M | 22% |
HBCP | SFST | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 75 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 14 | 79 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 35 | 40 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 31 | 66 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HBCP's Valuation (50) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFST (83) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HBCP’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFST’s over the last 12 months.
HBCP's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFST (79) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HBCP’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFST’s over the last 12 months.
HBCP's SMR Rating (35) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as SFST (40) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HBCP’s stock grew similarly to SFST’s over the last 12 months.
SFST's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HBCP (46) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that SFST’s stock grew similarly to HBCP’s over the last 12 months.
HBCP's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFST (66) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HBCP’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFST’s over the last 12 months.
| HBCP | SFST | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 15 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 5 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 82% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HBCP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while SFST’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- HBCP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SFST’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HBCP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFST’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HBCP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SFST’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
HBCP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.25% price change this week, while SFST (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.54% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.52%.
Reported Earning Dates
HBCP is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.
SFST is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-1.14% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
Advertisement
HBCP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBCP has been closely correlated with UVSP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HBCP jumps, then UVSP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HBCP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HBCP | 100% | -0.07% | ||
| UVSP - HBCP | 81% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| FBIZ - HBCP | 81% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| GSBC - HBCP | 81% Closely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| PRK - HBCP | 80% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| FMBH - HBCP | 80% Closely correlated | -0.14% | ||
More | ||||
SFST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFST has been closely correlated with THFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFST jumps, then THFF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SFST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFST | 100% | +0.86% | ||
| THFF - SFST | 77% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| STBA - SFST | 77% Closely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| GSBC - SFST | 76% Closely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| BANF - SFST | 76% Closely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| HBCP - SFST | 76% Closely correlated | -0.07% | ||
More | ||||