HBT
Price
$31.75
Change
+$0.13 (+0.41%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.16B
29 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MCBS
Price
$35.86
Change
+$0.78 (+2.22%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.03B
19 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HBT vs MCBS

HBT vs MCBS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HBT vs. MCBS commentary
Jun 28, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBT is a StrongBuy and MCBS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 28, 2026
Stock price -- (HBT: $31.75 vs. MCBS: $35.86)
Brand notoriety: HBT and MCBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HBT: 766% vs. MCBS: 759%
Market capitalization -- HBT: $1.16B vs. MCBS: $1.03B
HBT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.16B. MCBS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HBT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMCBS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HBT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MCBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HBT and MCBS are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HBT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCBS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HBT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MCBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCBS is a better buy in the short-term than HBT.

Price Growth

HBT (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.79% price change this week, while MCBS (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

HBT is expected to report earnings on Jul 27, 2026.

MCBS is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.42% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBT($1.16B) has a higher market cap than MCBS($1.03B). HBT has higher P/E ratio than MCBS: HBT (13.96) vs MCBS (12.29). MCBS YTD gains are higher at: 37.480 vs. HBT (24.827). MCBS has more cash in the bank: 279M vs. HBT (24.4M). HBT has less debt than MCBS: HBT (149M) vs MCBS (440M). HBT has higher revenues than MCBS: HBT (245M) vs MCBS (168M).
HBTMCBSHBT / MCBS
Capitalization1.16B1.03B112%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD24.82737.48066%
P/E Ratio13.9612.29114%
Revenue245M168M146%
Total Cash24.4M279M9%
Total Debt149M440M34%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HBT vs MCBS: Fundamental Ratings
HBT
MCBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4791
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1228
SMR RATING
1..100
5447
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4341
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2639
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HBT's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as MCBS (60). This means that HBT’s stock grew similarly to MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

HBT's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as MCBS (28). This means that HBT’s stock grew similarly to MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

MCBS's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as HBT (54). This means that MCBS’s stock grew similarly to HBT’s over the last 12 months.

MCBS's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as HBT (43). This means that MCBS’s stock grew similarly to HBT’s over the last 12 months.

HBT's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as MCBS (39). This means that HBT’s stock grew similarly to MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HBTMCBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
62%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HBT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MCBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TVIFX92.180.45
+0.49%
Thornburg American Opportunities I
VYCAX28.420.02
+0.07%
Voya Corporate Leaders 100 A
RERBX58.18-0.42
-0.72%
American Funds EUPAC R2
MGFRX7.34-0.06
-0.81%
MassMutual Global R4
PRJAX39.06-1.06
-2.64%
PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities A

HBT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBT has been closely correlated with FCBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HBT jumps, then FCBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBT
1D Price
Change %
HBT100%
+0.41%
FCBC - HBT
82%
Closely correlated
+1.87%
THFF - HBT
81%
Closely correlated
+2.01%
MBWM - HBT
81%
Closely correlated
+1.46%
UVSP - HBT
81%
Closely correlated
+2.12%
MCBS - HBT
81%
Closely correlated
+2.22%
More