Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFMRX vs TRQZX
HFMRX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts HFMRX vs TRQZX
HFMRX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFMRX vs. TRQZX commentary
Jul 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFMRX is a Buy and TRQZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 23B vs. HFMRX (3.65B). TRQZX pays higher dividends than HFMRX: TRQZX (0.71) vs HFMRX (0.00). HFMRX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: HFMRX (17 years) vs TRQZX (6 years). HFMRX (1.48) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). HFMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. TRQZX (31.50). HFMRX (0) and TRQZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.53 vs. HFMRX (-11.48). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : -15.70 vs. HFMRX (-36.67).
| HFMRX | TRQZX | HFMRX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.61 | 243% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.730 | 5.258 | 223% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.65B | 23B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.71 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.48 | 1.53 | -750% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.72 | 4.46 | -151% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.67 | -15.70 | 234% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.78 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement