Advertisement
HIMS vs PWP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HIMS is a Hold and PWP is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HIMS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePWP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- HIMS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PWP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HIMS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HIMS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- PWP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
HIMS (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а +22.86% price change this week, while PWP (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +2.46% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was -0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +30.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.63%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.08%.
Reported Earning Dates
HIMS is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2026.
PWP is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (-0.31% weekly)A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+2.38% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
| HIMS | PWP | HIMS / PWP | |
| Capitalization | 8.21B | 1.16B | 710% |
| EBITDA | 37.6M | 45.1M | 83% |
| Gain YTD | 9.239 | -7.705 | -120% |
| P/E Ratio | 57.14 | 63.40 | 90% |
| Revenue | 2.37B | 688M | 344% |
| Total Cash | 751M | 77.7M | 967% |
| Total Debt | 1.13B | 182M | 622% |
HIMS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 73 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| HIMS | PWP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 74% |
Advertisement
HIMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HIMS and COTY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HIMS and COTY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HIMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIMS | 100% | +11.23% | ||
| COTY - HIMS | 31% Poorly correlated | +2.63% | ||
| IPAR - HIMS | 24% Poorly correlated | +2.59% | ||
| HNST - HIMS | 23% Poorly correlated | +5.90% | ||
| NBIX - HIMS | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.45% | ||
| ALKS - HIMS | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.08% | ||
More | ||||
PWP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWP has been closely correlated with PIPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWP jumps, then PIPR could also see price increases.