PWP
Price
$16.08
Change
+$0.07 (+0.44%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:15 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.17B
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RJF
Price
$156.18
Change
-$0.47 (-0.30%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:15 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
30.53B
29 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PWP vs RJF

PWP vs RJF Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PWP vs. RJF commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PWP is a Buy and RJF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (PWP: $16.02 vs. RJF: $156.65)
Brand notoriety: PWP and RJF are both not notable
PWP represents the Investment Banks/Brokers, while RJF is part of the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PWP: 80% vs. RJF: 130%
Market capitalization -- PWP: $1.17B vs. RJF: $30.53B
PWP [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $1.17B. RJF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $30.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $163.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $14.56B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $9.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PWP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRJF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PWP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RJF is a better buy in the long-term than PWP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PWP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RJF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PWP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • RJF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PWP is a better buy in the short-term than RJF.

Price Growth

PWP (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +0.06% price change this week, while RJF (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.61%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

PWP is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

RJF is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-2.25% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Investment Managers (-2.28% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RJF($30.5B) has a higher market cap than PWP($1.17B). PWP has higher P/E ratio than RJF: PWP (64.08) vs RJF (14.79). RJF YTD gains are higher at: -1.758 vs. PWP (-6.716). RJF has more cash in the bank: 2.61B vs. PWP (77.7M). PWP has less debt than RJF: PWP (182M) vs RJF (4.22B). RJF has higher revenues than PWP: RJF (14.5B) vs PWP (688M).
PWPRJFPWP / RJF
Capitalization1.17B30.5B4%
EBITDA45.1MN/A-
Gain YTD-6.716-1.758382%
P/E Ratio64.0814.79433%
Revenue688M14.5B5%
Total Cash77.7M2.61B3%
Total Debt182M4.22B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RJF: Fundamental Ratings
RJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
23
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
32
SMR RATING
1..100
15
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
45

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PWPRJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PWP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RJF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KOP44.420.69
+1.58%
Koppers Holdings
MTB227.732.61
+1.16%
M&T Bank Corp
OMSE4.04-0.02
-0.49%
OMS Energy Technologies Inc.
MAT13.89-0.15
-1.07%
Mattel
JUNS0.23-0.01
-3.36%
Jupiter Neurosciences Inc

PWP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWP has been closely correlated with PIPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWP jumps, then PIPR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PWP
1D Price
Change %
PWP100%
+1.07%
PIPR - PWP
74%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
RJF - PWP
72%
Closely correlated
+0.51%
MC - PWP
66%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
EVR - PWP
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
LAZ - PWP
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.47%
More

RJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RJF has been closely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RJF jumps, then SF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RJF
1D Price
Change %
RJF100%
+0.51%
SF - RJF
87%
Closely correlated
+0.37%
MS - RJF
82%
Closely correlated
+1.76%
EVR - RJF
80%
Closely correlated
+0.62%
GS - RJF
80%
Closely correlated
+0.89%
PIPR - RJF
78%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
More