HLFN
Price
$33.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
47.12M
NWG
Price
$14.89
Change
+$0.61 (+4.27%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
59.17B
19 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HLFN vs NWG

Header iconHLFN vs NWG Comparison
Open Charts HLFN vs NWGBanner chart's image
Home Loan Financial
Price$33.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization47.12M
NatWest Group
Price$14.89
Change+$0.61 (+4.27%)
Volume$3.23M
Capitalization59.17B
HLFN vs NWG Comparison Chart in %
HLFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NWG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HLFN vs. NWG commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLFN is a Hold and NWG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (HLFN: $33.50 vs. NWG: $14.89)
Brand notoriety: HLFN and NWG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HLFN: 256% vs. NWG: 98%
Market capitalization -- HLFN: $47.12M vs. NWG: $59.17B
HLFN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $47.12M. NWG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $59.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HLFN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNWG’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • HLFN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NWG’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, NWG is a better buy in the long-term than HLFN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HLFN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NWG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HLFN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • NWG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HLFN is a better buy in the short-term than NWG.

Price Growth

HLFN (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NWG (@Regional Banks) price change was +6.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

NWG is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.44% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NWG($59.2B) has a higher market cap than HLFN($47.1M). NWG has higher P/E ratio than HLFN: NWG (9.02) vs HLFN (6.53). NWG YTD gains are higher at: 54.250 vs. HLFN (9.941). HLFN has less debt than NWG: HLFN (30M) vs NWG (70B). NWG has higher revenues than HLFN: NWG (15.5B) vs HLFN (17.6M).
HLFNNWGHLFN / NWG
Capitalization47.1M59.2B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.94154.25018%
P/E Ratio6.539.0272%
Revenue17.6M15.5B0%
Total Cash3.96MN/A-
Total Debt30M70B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HLFN vs NWG: Fundamental Ratings
HLFN
NWG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5090
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
183
SMR RATING
1..100
475
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5342
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6233
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NWG's Valuation (28) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as HLFN (58) in the null industry. This means that NWG’s stock grew similarly to HLFN’s over the last 12 months.

NWG's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as HLFN (18) in the null industry. This means that NWG’s stock grew similarly to HLFN’s over the last 12 months.

NWG's SMR Rating (5) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLFN (47) in the null industry. This means that NWG’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLFN’s over the last 12 months.

NWG's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as HLFN (53) in the null industry. This means that NWG’s stock grew similarly to HLFN’s over the last 12 months.

NWG's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as HLFN (62) in the null industry. This means that NWG’s stock grew similarly to HLFN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLFNNWG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HLFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NWG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SGOL37.040.29
+0.79%
abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF
QCOC22.050.01
+0.05%
FT Vest Nasdaq-100® Cnsrv Buffr ETF -Oct
AUGZ43.11N/A
N/A
TrueShares Structured Outcome August ETF
IGPT55.54-0.04
-0.07%
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF
MBS8.74-0.01
-0.17%
Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF

HLFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HLFN and CIBN have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HLFN and CIBN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLFN
1D Price
Change %
HLFN100%
N/A
CIBN - HLFN
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWG - HLFN
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.27%
KEY - HLFN
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
HVLM - HLFN
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HFBK - HLFN
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NWG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NWG has been closely correlated with LYG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NWG jumps, then LYG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWG
1D Price
Change %
NWG100%
+4.27%
LYG - NWG
71%
Closely correlated
+1.32%
BCS - NWG
68%
Closely correlated
+1.65%
DB - NWG
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.05%
UBS - NWG
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.88%
BBVA - NWG
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.89%
More