Advertisement
HLP vs LUD
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLP is a Hold and LUD is a Hold.
Aroon Indicator for HLP shows an upward move is likely
HLP's Aroon Indicator triggered a bullish signal on October 22, 2026. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor detected that the AroonUp green line is above 70 while the AroonDown red line is below 30. When the up indicator moves above 70 and the down indicator remains below 30, it is a sign that the stock could be setting up for a bullish move. Traders may want to buy the stock or look to buy calls options. A.I.dvisor looked at 131 similar instances where the Aroon Indicator showed a similar pattern. In 117 of the 131 cases, the stock moved higher in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a move higher at 89%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
Following a +6.38% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where HLP advanced for three days, in 154 of 176 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 88%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for HLP turned negative on October 21, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 24 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 22 of the 24 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 90%.
HLP broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 13, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 3 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 34 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. HLP’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 67 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (3.088) is normal, around the industry mean (2.211). P/E Ratio (79.333) is within average values for comparable stocks, (35.180). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (0.339). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.059) among similar stocks. HLP's P/S Ratio (7.716) is slightly higher than the industry average of (2.301).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. HLP’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 68, placing this stock worse than average.
LUD saw its Stochastic Oscillator leaves the overbought zone
The Stochastic Oscillator for LUD moved out of overbought territory on October 08, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock and investors may want to consider selling or taking a defensive position. A.I.dvisor looked at 14 similar instances where the indicator exited the overbought zone. In 14 of the 14 cases the stock moved lower. This puts the odds of a downward move at 90%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
LUD moved below its 50-day moving average on October 07, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for LUD crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 21, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 6 of 6 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where LUD declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
The Aroon Indicator for LUD entered a downward trend on October 16, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where LUD's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 9 of 9 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 22, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on LUD as a result. In 22 of 30 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 73%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for LUD just turned positive on October 16, 2026. Looking at past instances where LUD's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 9 of 11 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 82%.
Following a +8.76% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where LUD advanced for three days, in 43 of 52 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.
LUD may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 47 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 72 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (4.087) is normal, around the industry mean (2.211). LUD has a moderately high P/E Ratio (133.333) as compared to the industry average of (35.180). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (0.339). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.059) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.786) is also within normal values, averaging (2.301).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 78 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. LUD’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. LUD’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 68, placing this stock worse than average.
| HLP | LUD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 88% | 12 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HLP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while LUD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- HLP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- LUD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HLP’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LUD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HLP’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
- LUD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
HLP (@Steel) experienced а +1.67% price change this week, while LUD (@Steel) price change was -6.17% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was -1.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.77%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Steel (-1.33% weekly)The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.
Advertisement
HLP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HLP and CMC have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HLP and CMC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HLP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLP | 100% | +6.27% | ||
| CMC - HLP | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.72% | ||
| CLF - HLP | 10% Poorly correlated | -6.99% | ||
| ACNT - HLP | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.58% | ||
| LUD - HLP | 3% Poorly correlated | -2.41% | ||
| ASTL - HLP | 2% Poorly correlated | +2.23% | ||
More | ||||
LUD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LUD and SID have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LUD and SID's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LUD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LUD | 100% | -2.41% | ||
| SID - LUD | 12% Poorly correlated | -5.45% | ||
| ASTL - LUD | 11% Poorly correlated | +2.23% | ||
| WS - LUD | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.88% | ||
| KBSX - LUD | 6% Poorly correlated | -3.36% | ||
| PKX - LUD | 5% Poorly correlated | -6.27% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RSBA | 20.40 | 0.22 | +1.07% |
| Return Stacked Bonds & Merger Arbitrage ETF (RSBA) | |||
| CHGX | 33.05 | N/A | N/A |
| EA SERIES TRUST STANCE SUSTAINABLE BETA ETF | |||
| EWN | 64.15 | -1.46 | -2.23% |
| iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) | |||
| RND | 32.79 | -0.79 | -2.35% |
| First Trust Bloomberg R&D Leaders ETF (RND) | |||
| ESGE | 50.13 | -1.53 | -2.96% |
| iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF (ESGE) | |||