CLF
Price
$11.52
Change
-$0.11 (-0.95%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
6.57B
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HLP
Price
$1.23
Change
+$0.01 (+0.82%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
91.93M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLF vs HLP

CLF vs HLP Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLF vs. HLP commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLF is a Buy and HLP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (CLF: $11.52 vs. HLP: $1.23)
Brand notoriety: CLF: Notable vs. HLP: Not notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLF: 92% vs. HLP: 1%
Market capitalization -- CLF: $6.57B vs. HLP: $91.93M
CLF [@Steel] is valued at $6.57B. HLP’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $91.93M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $58.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $11.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHLP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HLP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HLP is a better buy in the long-term than CLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • HLP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HLP is a better buy in the short-term than CLF.

Price Growth

CLF (@Steel) experienced а -3.44% price change this week, while HLP (@Steel) price change was +9.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was -2.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLF is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (-2.97% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLF($6.57B) has a higher market cap than HLP($91.9M). CLF has higher P/E ratio than HLP: CLF (145.67) vs HLP (41.00). HLP YTD gains are higher at: 18.269 vs. CLF (-13.253).
CLFHLPCLF / HLP
Capitalization6.57B91.9M7,152%
EBITDA483MN/A-
Gain YTD-13.25318.269-73%
P/E Ratio145.6741.00355%
Revenue19.2BN/A-
Total Cash70MN/A-
Total Debt7.7BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLF: Fundamental Ratings
CLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
39
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLFHLP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HLP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WRX.X0.0163270.000615
+3.91%
WazirX cryptocurrency
STRAX.X0.008458-0.000010
-0.12%
Xertra cryptocurrency
GAS.X0.922045-0.017888
-1.90%
Gas cryptocurrency
ICP.X2.020868-0.047653
-2.30%
Internet Computer cryptocurrency
ALPACA.X0.000554-0.000014
-2.38%
Alpaca Finance cryptocurrency

HLP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HLP and CMC have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HLP and CMC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLP
1D Price
Change %
HLP100%
+0.82%
CMC - HLP
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
CLF - HLP
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
SID - HLP
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.42%
ACNT - HLP
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
HUDI - HLP
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.22%
More