Advertisement
HMC vs RIVN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMC is a Hold and RIVN is a Hold.
HMC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 87 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 79 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| HMC | RIVN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 54% | 7 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 1 day ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 89% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HMC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while RIVN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- HMC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RIVN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HMC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RIVN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HMC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
- RIVN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
HMC (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а -1.77% price change this week, while RIVN (@Motor Vehicles) price change was -3.47% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -3.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -18.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -26.32%.
Reported Earning Dates
HMC is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
RIVN is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Motor Vehicles (-3.24% weekly)Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.
Advertisement
HMC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HMC has been closely correlated with TM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HMC jumps, then TM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HMC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HMC | 100% | +0.06% | ||
| TM - HMC | 74% Closely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| GM - HMC | 44% Loosely correlated | +3.00% | ||
| F - HMC | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.74% | ||
| RACE - HMC | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.41% | ||
| RIVN - HMC | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.20% | ||
More | ||||
RIVN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RIVN has been loosely correlated with TSLA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RIVN jumps, then TSLA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RIVN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RIVN | 100% | -1.20% | ||
| TSLA - RIVN | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| LCID - RIVN | 38% Loosely correlated | +2.95% | ||
| HMC - RIVN | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.06% | ||
| GP - RIVN | 31% Poorly correlated | -3.73% | ||
| GM - RIVN | 29% Poorly correlated | +3.00% | ||
More | ||||