HMN
Price
$39.79
Change
-$0.74 (-1.83%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.49B
72 days until earnings call
UFCS
Price
$25.47
Change
-$0.73 (-2.79%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
550.29M
79 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HMN vs UFCS

Header iconHMN vs UFCS Comparison
Open Charts HMN vs UFCSBanner chart's image
Horace Mann Educators
Price$39.79
Change-$0.74 (-1.83%)
Volume$208.41K
Capitalization1.49B
United Fire Group
Price$25.47
Change-$0.73 (-2.79%)
Volume$152.91K
Capitalization550.29M
HMN vs UFCS Comparison Chart
Loading...
HMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UFCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HMN vs. UFCS commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMN is a Hold and UFCS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (HMN: $39.79 vs. UFCS: $25.47)
Brand notoriety: HMN and UFCS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HMN: 111% vs. UFCS: 100%
Market capitalization -- HMN: $1.49B vs. UFCS: $550.29M
HMN [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $1.49B. UFCS’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $550.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HMN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUFCS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HMN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UFCS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HMN is a better buy in the long-term than UFCS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HMN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UFCS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HMN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • UFCS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UFCS is a better buy in the short-term than HMN.

Price Growth

HMN (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -3.28% price change this week, while UFCS (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -3.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

HMN is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

UFCS is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.68% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HMN($1.5B) has a higher market cap than UFCS($550M). UFCS has higher P/E ratio than HMN: UFCS (41.53) vs HMN (33.55). HMN YTD gains are higher at: 1.427 vs. UFCS (-10.475). HMN has more cash in the bank: 552M vs. UFCS (102M). UFCS has less debt than HMN: UFCS (50M) vs HMN (546M). HMN has higher revenues than UFCS: HMN (1.43B) vs UFCS (1.1B).
HMNUFCSHMN / UFCS
Capitalization1.5B550M272%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.427-10.475-14%
P/E Ratio33.5541.5381%
Revenue1.43B1.1B131%
Total Cash552M102M541%
Total Debt546M50M1,092%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HMN vs UFCS: Fundamental Ratings
HMN
UFCS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8838
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
70100
SMR RATING
1..100
8780
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4752
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9574
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HMN's Valuation (27) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as UFCS (36) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that HMN’s stock grew similarly to UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

HMN's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as UFCS (100) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that HMN’s stock grew similarly to UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's SMR Rating (80) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as HMN (87) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to HMN’s over the last 12 months.

HMN's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as UFCS (52) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that HMN’s stock grew similarly to UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's P/E Growth Rating (74) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as HMN (95) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to HMN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HMNUFCS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UFCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CDWCX11.090.02
+0.18%
American Funds Dvlpg Wld Gr&Inc 529C
FVLCX19.34-0.24
-1.23%
Fidelity Advisor Value Leaders C
MFRFX58.88-1.03
-1.72%
MFS Research A
WCMGX28.96-0.74
-2.49%
First Trust WCM Focused Global Gr Inst
GGRAX10.75-0.28
-2.54%
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth A

HMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HMN has been loosely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HMN jumps, then L could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HMN
1D Price
Change %
HMN100%
-1.83%
L - HMN
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
CINF - HMN
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%
SAFT - HMN
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
UFCS - HMN
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.79%
THG - HMN
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.24%
More

UFCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UFCS has been loosely correlated with SAFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UFCS jumps, then SAFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UFCS
1D Price
Change %
UFCS100%
-2.79%
SAFT - UFCS
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
L - UFCS
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
CINF - UFCS
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%
CNA - UFCS
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
AFG - UFCS
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.80%
More